Brad Lander detained by masked federal agents inside immigration court

2025-06-1717:25333313www.thecity.nyc

The dizzying day began when the city comptroller and mayoral candidate made his latest visit to an immigration court in Manhattan.

Federal agents detained New York City Comptroller Brad Lander inside a Lower Manhattan immigration court building Tuesday morning as he attempted to escort a man from his court appearance there. 

Lander, who is also running for mayor in next week’s Democratic primary, was held inside the building for over four hours before he was eventually released without charges after an intervention by Gov. Kathy Hochul.

“I know I will get due process and that my rights will be protected,” Lander said to a throng of supporters who gathered spontaneously in Foley Square that evening after his release. 

“But Edgardo will sleep in an ICE detention facility God knows where tonight…he has been stripped of his due process rights in a country that is supposed to be founded on equal justice under law,” Lander continued, naming the immigrant detained by federal agents at the same time the comptroller was taken into custody. 

Lander had been inside 26 Federal Plaza to observe hearings and accompany immigrants leaving routine court appearances. It was his third time observing federal immigration hearings since masked federal agents began staking out immigration courtrooms last month, targeting immigrants for arrest.

At around noon, Lander had linked arms with Edgardo leaving an immigration courtroom on the 12th floor, refusing to let go as agents pushed into the crowd attempting to pull him away.

In the chaotic scene, Lander asked the agents repeatedly to show a judicial warrant.

“You do not have the authority to arrest U.S. citizens,” Lander repeated, as the officers tightened handcuffs to his wrists.

The federal agents escorted him into an elevator, with one member of his NYPD security detail alongside him.

A reporter from THE CITY had overheard one agent say to another minutes before Lander’s arrest, “Do you want to arrest the Comptroller?”

Federal agents detain a man leaving immigration court along with Comptroller Brad Lander, June 17, 2025. Credit: Ben Fractenberg/THE CITY

It turns out the federal authorities did want to. DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement, “New York City Comptroller Brad Lander was arrested for assaulting law enforcement and impeding a federal officer, adding: “No one is above the law, and if you lay a hand on a law enforcement officer, you will face consequences.”

In a tweet with the same words, the official DHS X account added: “it is wrong that politicians seeking higher office undermine law enforcement safety to get a viral moment.”

THE CITY’s video of the incident shows Lander holding on to the person ICE is arresting but does not show him assaulting anyone. 

Lander’s arrest provoked widespread outrage, and a drove of elected officials and mayoral candidates descended on 26 Federal Plaza calling for his immediate release. The group included Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani (D-Queens), who has co-endorsed Lander in the race for mayor.

“This is bullshit,” Gov. Kathy Hochul posted to social media on Tuesday afternoon. She arrived at 26 Federal Plaza later that afternoon, hugging Lander’s wife before going inside. 

Gov. Kathy Hochul waits inside 26 Federal Plaza to speak with Comptroller Brad Lander after federal agents detained him, June 17, 2027. Credit: Gwynne Hogan/THE CITY

“I’m here to show support for Brad Lander and everyone else who’s in this situation,” she told reporters outside the building before going up.

“I’m here to show who we are as New Yorkers and who we’re standing for, and this is intolerable.”

She spent around an hour on the 9th floor of the building, talking to ICE agents there before Lander was eventually walked out by agents.

“How long is this going to take?” Hochul asked, chatting up the agents as she waited. “I don’t think he has a long rap sheet.”

A spokeswoman for Mayor Eric Adams, who has vowed not to publicly criticize Donald Trump, responded to the incident in a statement a spokesperson sent to the New York Post four hours after the comptroller’s arrest, saying: “today should not be about Brad Lander.”

The spokeswoman, Kayla Mamelak Altus, went on to say that “it’s about making sure all New Yorkers — regardless of their documentation status — feel safe enough to use public resources, like dialing 911, sending their kids to school, going to the hospital, or attending court appearances, and do not instead hide in the shadows.” 

By then, at least two of political allies of Adams had mocked Lander online — including former mayoral Chief of Staff Frank Carone, who derided what he called an “Academy award” performance.

Federal Agents arrest Comptroller Brad Lander while was escorting a person from immigration court at 26 Federal Plaza, June 17, 2025. Credit: Ben Fractenberg/THE CITY

Asked after his release if the courthouse arrest had been a political stunt in the final days of his mayoral campaign, Lander pushed back. 

“I did not come today expecting to get arrested,” Lander retorted, pointing to earlier visits to the court where he had been able to escort people out of the building without incident. “I came today just expecting to do that again, and I really think I failed today because my goal was to get Edgardo out of the building.”

Lander was the latest Democratic elected official treated harshly by the Trump administration while advocating for immigrants caught in the national crackdown. Last week federal agents tackled and handcuffed U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) when he tried to question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a media event related to immigration.

Comptroller Brad Lander speaks to a crowd at Foley Square after he was released from federal detention, June 17, 2025. Credit: Alex Krales/THE CITY

Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) was hit last week with federal charges stemming from her attempt in May to visit a privately operated migrant detention facility in Newark.

That city’s mayor, Ras Baraka, was also arrested in that confrontation, though the trespassing charges against him were later dropped by a magistrate judge who scolded federal prosecutors for “a significant misstep, since “an arrest, particularly of a public figure, is not a preliminary investigative tool.”

Moments ahead of Lander’s arrest, THE CITY had asked him why he was inside immigration court in the final days of the Democratic primary here, rather than out talking to voters. 

“I don’t think there’s any place that’s more important to be right now than bearing witness and trying to stand up for the rule of law,” Lander said. “A big question on the campaign trail is how will you stand up to Donald Trump.”

Federal agents arrest a man leaving an immigration hearing at 26 Federal Plaza, June 17, 2025. Credit: Ben Fractenberg/THE CITY

In a dig at the frontrunner in mayoral race polls, Lander added, “Andrew Cuomo wants to tell a story about what he would do, but he views it as like a finger-poking ego fight — not show up and protect people.”

Cuomo, speaking at a get-out-the-vote rally with his union supporters, called Lander’s arrest “a disgusting display of the thuggery of Trump’s ICE.” It was, he said, “a direct consequence of Mayor Adams handing the keys to Donald Trump.”


Read the original article

Comments

  • By potholereseller 2025-06-1718:005 reply

    The actual title of the acticle is "Brad Lander Detained by Masked Federal Agents Inside Immigration Court".

    Contrary to the current title here on HN, Lander was not arrested for asking to see a warrant; TFA states the opposite, "It wasn’t immediately clear what charges, if any, the mayoral candidate will face. A spokesperson for ICE didn’t immediately return a request for comment."

    If an event is so important to know about, why fabricate such an important aspect of the event in this way?

    • By dang 2025-06-183:02

      We eventually changed it. Submitted title was "ICE arrests NYC Comptroller because he asked to see a warrant".

      Submitters: please use the original title unless it is misleading or linkbait. This is in the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

    • By Avshalom 2025-06-1722:412 reply

      If we want to stick to the facts: we don't actually have any proof that these were federal agents because they refuse to identify themselves. All we actually know is that Lander was kidnapped.

      • By BonoboIO 2025-06-1723:06

        It’s only a question when people will draw guns because they understandably think they are getting kidnapped.

        Look at the murder of the 2 democrats a few days ago by a fake cop.

      • By speakfreely 2025-06-182:421 reply

        [flagged]

        • By adr1an 2025-06-1813:091 reply

          Ah, then it was a non-criminal kidnapping in a federal courthouse by unidentified police officers. That's so NORMAL!

          • By tartoran 2025-06-1821:57

            This.. What is been happening lately is absolutely batshit crazy. Now anyone could mask up and arrest some key witness right from the courthouse posing as ICE agents, regardless of their status and nobody could bat an eye because ICE seem to have some kind of supreme auhority and no law applies to them, they don't need to identify themselves, even show their faces.

    • By dragonwriter 2025-06-1723:241 reply

      He was, in fact, arrested for asking to see a warrant, that is clearly documented.

      The claims of assault that DHS fabricated and published on social media and via other channels after the fact to justify it, of which there is no evidence, before Lander was released without any charges are interesting in terms of understanding the current regime's propaganda propensity, but have nothing to do with explaining the events clearly captured on video.

      • By apparent 2025-06-180:171 reply

        CBS reports he was arrested for assaulting an officer and impeding a federal enforcement action, or some such thing.

        • By soco 2025-06-189:331 reply

          So, asking to see the warrant is impeding a federal enforcement action? Like, following laws or rules is impeding action?

          • By apparent 2025-06-1816:121 reply

            I don't think that's what they were referring to. From watching the video, I assume it was when he grabbed onto the fellow they were detaining and refused to let go.

    • By nathanaldensr 2025-06-1718:04

      It serves the narrative, which is more important than facts. That's why people often say we are living in a "post-truth society."

    • By Simulacra 2025-06-1718:042 reply

      A couple of reasons:

      Clickbait, Incitement, Selling something, or Bad Journalism

      It happens all the time, but your point is absolutely correct. Media fabrication undermines confidence in the reporting.

      • By tootie 2025-06-1723:16

        The issue is the HN title not matching the actual story. The City headline is correct. And the HN headline has also been updated to be correct.

      • By potholereseller 2025-06-1719:201 reply

        The other commenter mentioned "narrative", which is very relevant, because that is an important part of simulation (and your username)

        Baudrilliard was careful to point out that simulation isn't a matter of fabrication; to simulate is to obscure the absence of facts, not to create false facts. A simulacrum is a symbol that obscures the fact that it refers to nothing; whereas a symbol, in centuries past, invariably referred to something, real or imagined. The resulting reality (or maybe "mindspace"?) is a construct on top of the real world -- a hyper-reality -- in which every symbol is a simulacrum; the only thing real in hyper-reality is that the symbols hide the absence of facts. This is why, again as the other commenter mentions, we appear to live in a post-truth society; we are fully living in hyper-reality.

        >Bad Journalism

        The guy who created the Pullitzer prize also co-invented Yellow Journalism.[0][1] There is neither good journalism or bad journalism; it's all simulation.

        [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Pulitzer#Pulitzer_Prize

        [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_journalism#Origins:_Pul...

        • By wahern 2025-06-1722:281 reply

          > the only thing real in hyper-reality is that the symbols hide the absence of facts

          What's a fact? Concepts like justice and fairness are fundamentally cultural constructs, and yet they've always been a core concern of human society. Setting up "facts" in opposition to "simulation" is no less a rhetorical narrative than what the article is pushing.

          My takeaway from post-structuralism generally isn't that we live in a "fake" reality, but that the human experience--individually, collectively--is deeply complicated.

          • By potholereseller 2025-06-1723:021 reply

            Baudrilliard didn't assert that reality/facts never existed; he in fact asserted that prior to the 20th century, there was plenty of correlation between symbols and facts/reality. His vision of the hyper-real is that it is detached from reality and it's facts; this is why I included "mindspace" parenthetically as an alternative word for "hyper-reality"; those operating in hyper-reality are physically in reality, but their actions appear to be based on another world, which they share through things like news media.

            > post-structuralism

            I don't think Baudrilliard can be categorized as post-structuralist or post-modernist, because "Baudrillard had also opposed post-structuralism, and had distanced himself from postmodernism."[0]

            [0] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Baudrillard>

  • By duxup 2025-06-1717:316 reply

    The whole story of telling ICE agents to just go out and find people on their own seems like a setup to empower the executive branch to have their own group of thugs. Without guidance they do what want outside the judicial system and sensible oversight / rules.

    This seems to be a pattern in most non democratic countries...

    • By mlsu 2025-06-1717:525 reply

      Another thing that is troubling is that immigration law is sort of a parallel system to normal criminal law. The rights for the accused are lesser and obligations for officers are more lax. The burden of proof is lower. It's easier to get warrants and the rules of evidence are more relaxed.

      There is a parallel authoritarian system being built up, starting with the creation of DHS in 2001 and ending god knows where. The massive expansion of ICE should ring alarm bells for everyone. This power grab does not end. It will expand and continue.

      Why are the right libertarians and 2A folks not speaking up right now? We have masked feds rolling up and barging in without warrants...?

      • By duxup 2025-06-1717:582 reply

        Agreed, ICE seems like a natural org to begin extra legal actions with, fewer limits, you just claim you're doing immigration things and put the accused on a more oppressive track.

        • By chneu 2025-06-1723:302 reply

          Like it's seriously Nazi shit. This is police with extreme powers. All they have to say is "We thought they were illegal" and nothing will happen.

          • By potato3732842 2025-06-1810:401 reply

            >Like it's seriously Nazi shit. This is police with extreme powers. All they have to say is "We thought they were illegal" and nothing will happen.

            This is barely any different from "we thought we smelled weed".

            The problem isn't ICE. They are just todays's live action remake of the same story we've seen before.

            The problem is that there is no punishment, no consequences for all those people who, regardless of if through malice or ignorance, let these precedents be made and stand.

            Arguably the current situation is worse than the abuses of years past because unlike drug prosecution to which a cross section of society is subjected ICE's prosecution targets (mostly) non citizens who will simply be deported to little effect upon the citizens whereas the citizens had to live with the fallout from drug prosecutions.

          • By know-how 2025-06-189:16

            [dead]

        • By computerthings 2025-06-189:47

          [dead]

      • By hansjorg 2025-06-1722:452 reply

        > Why are the right libertarians and 2A folks not speaking up right now

        It has been entertaining listening to the people at Reason Magazine lately. They have convinced themselves thoroughly that they're not actually racist authoritarians, so now that they're getting what they really want, but it's so diametrically opposed to what they say they believe, they have to contort themselves endlessly.

        Do not expect any kind of help from those kinds of people. Their anti-authoritarianism is largely performative or reserved to their in-group. When it's not performative, it's just rich kids complaining they're not allowed do to whatever they want.

        • By acdha 2025-06-1723:40

          I’ve checked in on Reason from time to time and it’s scary. They’ll have an article accurately recognizing the threat and incompatibility with even remotely libertarian principles, and the comments are like “this boot tastes great!” or “not a problem as long as it happens to brown people”.

          Their top immigration story right now is a great example: https://reason.com/2025/06/12/california-immigration-raids-a...

        • By cosmicgadget 2025-06-1722:591 reply

          "I don't want to pay taxes or have firearms laws but I want to appear ideologically consistent."

          • By pixl97 2025-06-180:35

            "I don't want the law to apply to me... now as for you"

      • By potato3732842 2025-06-1718:003 reply

        >Another thing that is troubling is that immigration law is sort of a parallel system to normal criminal law. The rights for the accused are lesser and obligations for officers are more lax. The burden of proof is lower. It's easier to get warrants and the rules of evidence are more relaxed.

        I would be absolutely elated if the end result of all this crap is a judicial president that eviscerates the many parallel systems that the feds/state/local governments run in all sorts of specialty areas of law.

        >Why are the right libertarians and 2A folks not speaking up right now? We have masked feds rolling up and barging in without warrants...?

        Right now you're making the same complaints about immigration process that hardcore libertarians made decades ago about traffic court and code enforcement and were brushed off for various reasons. They're keeping their mouths shut so as to not interfere with the learning process.

        • By mlsu 2025-06-1718:352 reply

          It's fantastic that right libertarians have the opportunity to own me, a lib. The silver lining to all of this is all of the epic lib-owning that can be done as a result of the destruction of the rule of law. But, by my reading, traffic court and HOA fees were not cause of all of this. Right libertarians rightfully complained in 2001 when the DHS was formed; they again rightfully complained in the 2010's when Snowden blew the lid open on global surveillance. I would like to see them resist in a meaningful way here and now. Unfortunately it seems they are busy going to cryptocurrency conferences at Mar-a-Lago.

          > I would be absolutely elated if the end result of all this crap is a judicial president that eviscerates the many parallel systems that the feds/state/local governments run in all sorts of specialty areas of law.

          I think we saw what giving power to the "right guy" in the executive branch lead us. The thing that will stop us going down this road is, at this point, active resistance from local and state governments, private businesses and government contractors, and large multi-national corporations.

          You need a lot of ICE, an absolutely staggering number of cops and jails, to deport twenty million people. It should be crystal clear by now that they will attempt to follow through with this promise, by whatever means necessary.

          • By Smoosh 2025-06-1811:341 reply

            What people don’t seem to ask is, what will all of those enforcement officers do once they have deported a sufficient number of people such that the task becomes more difficult?

          • By potato3732842 2025-06-1817:01

            There is no "right guy". The sooner you learn that the better.

        • By mindslight 2025-06-1718:102 reply

          > Right now you're making the same complaints about immigration process that hardcore libertarians made decades ago about traffic court and code enforcement and were brushed off for various reasons. They're keeping their mouths shut so as to not interfere with the learning process.

          Can you point me to some examples of people a decade ago running afoul of traffic or code enforcement, and being sent to an extrajudicial concentration camp for it?

          But seriously, stop trying to be edgy with needlessly contrarian points. Stop gloating because us libertarians were talking about the trend of unaccountable government processes before it was popular. The dam breaking is not something to be celebrated, you're just adding fuel to the fire.

          It's time to circle the wagons and defend our country together. True libertarians are not "keeping our mouths shut", but rather speaking out against the rapidly increasing government power. One cause, which we have to be mature and acknowledge, is the destruction of bureaucracy (which we've always disliked, but at least it moderated) in favor of unrestrained autocracy.

        • By ajb 2025-06-1811:06

          I would be absolutely elated if the end result of all this crap is a judicial president that eviscerates the many parallel systems that the feds/state/local governments run in all sorts of specialty areas of law.

          The mechanism that is not working right now is not the presidency - it's congress. You could have Trump still in charge, but if congress were opposed to his actions - even to the extent of just repulsing his usurpation of powers he's not supposed to have - he would be a lame duck. And in fact a president on their own can't revert all this, they need congress to pass laws.

          What this means is that it could end as soon as 2026. But this possibility will not last forever; if Trump succeeds in putting in place commanders in the army and police who are personally loyal to him in spite of the laws, then restoring the Republic will take many years.

      • By sjsdaiuasgdia 2025-06-1718:002 reply

        > Why are the right libertarians and 2A folks not speaking up right now?

        “If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.” - Lyndon B. Johnson

        • By pyuser583 2025-06-180:58

          Lyndon Johnson spent his entire life in government service, building a larger and larger state. The only pocket picking he knew was taxation.

      • By _DeadFred_ 2025-06-1819:58

        I mean all ICE would really have to do is get people to agree to a TOS and in the USA that's good enough for you to now be forced into a parallel (quasi)legal system. The government already has this TOS in the form of plea deals which include giving up your constitutional rights.

    • By NemoNobody 2025-06-180:00

      Trump wants to declare martial law, he is trying to incite a reasonable enough response, the courts won't challenge him, he wants riots to be bad enough that upon his issuing the Exec Order, everyone just accepts/abides by his new king powers and obeys him like one.

    • By NickC25 2025-06-1717:361 reply

      That's the gameplan, it's written in detail in the Project 2025 outline...

    • By know-how 2025-06-189:14

      [dead]

    • By drcongo 2025-06-1718:04

      [flagged]

    • By lmm 2025-06-1723:004 reply

      Most democratic countries don't have decades of regular law enforcement refusing to enforce democratically agreed immigration law, which is what has made this defensible.

      • By NemoNobody 2025-06-180:051 reply

        You are only fine if everyone is fine.

        If it can happen to a brown person, it can happen to you - maybe have a little self interest, or perhaps consider how boring America would be without immigrants and black people - that's kinda where all our culture comes from, in our melting pot everything blends together.

        • By lmm 2025-06-181:521 reply

          Nice try. I'm an immigrant and a minority myself, not that people like you ever actually care about supporting people like me.

          • By ben_w 2025-06-1814:001 reply

            Great, so am I (different country though).

            So, what are your thoughts about ICE going after immigrants who think they're legal but didn't dot all the i's and cross all the t's on their paperwork? Because that is in the news as well.

      • By acdha 2025-06-1723:441 reply

        You appear to be arguing that law enforcement focusing on dangers to their communities and not doing someone else’s job instead is bad. It’s exactly hard to find examples of cops who investigated real crimes and pulled ICE in when they realized the perp wasn’t here legally.

        • By lmm 2025-06-180:481 reply

          > You appear to be arguing that law enforcement focusing on dangers to their communities and not doing someone else’s job instead is bad.

          Deprioritising lawlessness against the will of the electorate is bad enough, but I'm talking about deliberate noncooperation policies, e.g. the California sanctuary laws. That's going much further than "focusing on" other things.

          • By acdha 2025-06-181:021 reply

            > Deprioritising lawlessness against the will of the electorate is bad enough

            You’re arguing that your personal opinion is “the will of the electorate”. The policies directing local police to focus on crime affecting their communities instead of shadowing federal immigration enforcement weren’t imposed by an aliens, they were enacted by democratically elected representatives.

            California’s sanctuary laws are the subject of considerable mythology but they had no effect on crime rates according to actual studies because they don’t prohibit cops from working with law enforcement for cases involving people who pose a risk to their communities. They can’t hold people without cause or use a parking ticket to get someone deported but there’s no problem cooperating with federal law enforcement to get rid of a robber, killer, rapist, etc. – the kind of people most of the electorate want enforcement focused on, not gardeners and farm workers.

            https://calmatters.org/justice/2025/01/california-sanctuary-...

      • By insane_dreamer 2025-06-1818:131 reply

        > refusing to enforce democratically agreed immigration law

        the main reason why immigration law has not been enforced is because a large number of US businesses (farms, factories, etc.) depend on those illegal immigrants as their workforce

        if you really wanted to enforce immigration law you would shut down businesses who employ illegals -- which would also stem the tide of people coming into the US -- but that hasn't been done because immigrants -- regardless of their official status -- are a net positive for the US economy

        • By lmm 2025-06-190:06

          > if you really wanted to enforce immigration law you would shut down businesses who employ illegals

          I'm all for that (although California seemingly isn't, given that they make it illegal for those businesses to use e-Verify in most cases). I don't see any contradiction between doing that and continuing regular immigration enforcement. I certainly don't see how you can argue that we should stop regular immigration enforcement until we've done this new thing.

      • By insane_dreamer 2025-06-1818:111 reply

        > made this defensible

        That's like saying vigilantism is defensible.

        I don't care if these "officers" (in quotes as we don't know who they are) are doing God's work, if they are 1) refusing to show proof that they are indeed officers and 2) have legal warrants for an arrest, and 3) provide those they arrest with due process, then they are acting outside the law

        • By lmm 2025-06-190:031 reply

          > That's like saying vigilantism is defensible.

          When traditional law enforcement fails to the point that the rule of law completely breaks down, vigilantism becomes defensible.

          > I don't care if these "officers" (in quotes as we don't know who they are) are doing God's work, if they are 1) refusing to show proof that they are indeed officers and 2) have legal warrants for an arrest, and 3) provide those they arrest with due process, then they are acting outside the law

          ICE has the legal authority to arrest without warrants in many cases. I don't like it, but this is the flipsides of decades of insisting that illegal immigration isn't a crime and illegal immigrants aren't criminals.

          • By insane_dreamer 2025-06-190:50

            > the rule of law completely breaks down

            pretty hard to argue that the rule of law as completely broken down in the US

            > ICE has the legal authority to arrest without warrants in many cases

            yeah, you're probably right about that though I think it's more "some" cases than "many" (they can't enter your house to search for someone without a warrant); due process still holds though

HackerNews