The Great Decoupling (Or Why Your Clicks Are Down and Impressions Up)

2025-06-1816:402311ahrefs.com

If your Google Search Console chart looks like an open-mouthed crocodile, with clicks plummeting as impressions soar, here’s why.

If your Google Search Console chart looks like an open-mouthed crocodile, with clicks plummeting as impressions soar, here’s why.

The roll-out of AI Overviews now creates two opportunities for top-ranking content to log impressions for a given keyword, while simultaneously reducing the number of people who click from the search engine results page (SERP) into your content.

If your boss is giving you a hard time over this, it really isn’t your fault. As this SERoundtable article attests to, this is something being observed across the industry (comments on my recent LinkedIn post corroborate this, too).

And we’re impacted. Here’s what this looks like for the Ahrefs blog, via the GSC report in Ahrefs:

In the six-month period at the end of 2024, the daily impressions and clicks for the Ahrefs blog showed a positive correlation of 0.425. Clicks and impressions generally increased together. You can see this in the graph above: both lines generally move up and down in tandem.

In the first six months of this year, that correlation has changed radically to a negative correlation of -0.352. Now, as impressions climb, clicks tend to decrease at the same time. Impressions are soaring while clicks are plummeting. Clicks and impressions have become decoupled from one another—one can grow while the other declines.

Hence what Darwin Santos perfectly dubbed “The Great Decoupling”. One of the few hard-and-fast rules of SEO no longer holds. Thanks Google.

Impressions are increasing because AI Overviews now give companies two chances to log an impression for a given keyword: once as a “traditional” blue link in the search results, and again as a citation in an AI Overview.

Most AI Overview citations seem to be pulled from content that already ranks highly in the traditional search results (per one study, “Three-quarters of the links cited in Google AI Overview appear in position 12 or higher in the organic search results”).

If your content already ranks highly enough to earn a decent number of organic impressions, there’s a good chance it could also be cited in an AI Overview and earn impressions there, too.

At the same time, clicks are decreasing because AI Overviews are increasing zero-click searches. Searchers can get all the information they need to resolve their query without leaving the search results page.

When we studied this at scale across 300,000 keywords, we found that the presence of an AI Overview correlates with a 34.5% reduction in clickthrough rate.

So, at the same time that impressions are soaring, clicks are at an all-time low.

The period of this widening gap between clicks and impressions corresponds with the large-scale rollout of AI Overviews. Alongside the March Core update, we found that the presence of AI Overviews doubled, increasing by 116%—the same time these “crocodile mouths” appeared:

And, as Ahrefs’ Patrick Stox points out, sites with very few AI Overviews do not share this same pattern:

The great decoupling will probably continue until AI Overviews finish rolling out—but now that it seems likely that AI Mode will become the default search experience, it’s possible this trend could continue.

You can use the SERP features filter to see exactly where AI Overviews are triggering for your keyword rankings.

Head to Ahrefs’ Site Explorer, navigate to the Organic keywords report, and select AI Overview from the SERP features filter. Filter to keywords where your domain ranks in Position: 1-10, and you’ll see the keywords most likely to receive impressions from both organic rankings and an AI Overview:

When I do this for Ahrefs, I can see over 19,000 keywords that trigger an AI Overview and include Ahrefs in the top ten results:

Using Ahrefs’ new AI visibility tool, Brand Radar, you can then filter our database of AI Overviews to see those that include a link to your URL:

Here, I can see over 5,000 keywords that include Ahrefs as a citation. Any keywords that appear both here and in the previous report are likely to be suffering from increased impressions and reduced clicks, pulling double-duty in both the organic results and the AI Overview.

Final thoughts

I’ve seen hundreds of GSC accounts over the years, and until recently, never seen a pattern like this. Now it’s everywhere.

In the past, blog traffic growth seemed well correlated with business growth. But today, I see that correlation weakening. This isn’t a case of one blog bleeding traffic—this is an entire industry being recalibrated in real-time.

But it’s not all doom and gloom. While our clicks are tanking because of AI search, recent data from Patrick Stox shows that—at least on the Ahrefs website—visits from AI search convert 23x better than visits from traditional search.

The way content marketing functions is very different, but guess what? There are more potential customers in the world, more demand for products and services. That is the real determinant of growth, not clicks to a blog. We’ll find different ways to reach those people.

(But we should probably change our traffic growth targets…)


Read the original article

Comments

  • By nicbou 2025-06-197:22

    I am facing this problem. It’s devastating to think that my job is now to prepare LLM training data. I am still doing useful work translating the real world into useful guides, just with half the audience and half the pay. If the trend continues, I will need to stop doing this full time.

    Google and other AI companies effectively killed the incentive to share text on the internet. With it dies an important chunk of the independent web.

  • By LordShredda 2025-06-1817:092 reply

    I have ahrefs blocked from accessing my webserver as they don't consistently respect robots.txt. I suggest everyone do the same.

    • By xnx 2025-06-1818:00

      Agree. Ahrefs is part of the seo garbage industrial complex.

    • By bediger4000 2025-06-2021:57

      I have them blocked as well. Solidarity.

  • By jaoane 2025-06-1817:372 reply

    > Searchers can get all the information they need to resolve their query without leaving the search results page.

    The best thing Google has done in the last decade easily.

    • By add-sub-mul-div 2025-06-1818:212 reply

      There could not be a worse idea than to put all trust in one institution, even if its reputation was still clean.

      Google has continally abused trust on ethics and on accuracy.

      Yes, it would be nice if there was a button you could push to ask any question and get a simple answer. No, we are not there yet. No, there are no shortcuts in life. You have to go to a source and evaluate its information and its trustworthiness in its own context otherwise you are not meeting your responsibility of diligence.

      • By jaoane 2025-06-1818:382 reply

        For most queries the AI summary works. If it doesn’t, oh well.

        Yesterday I looked up how much a certain car weighs. The AI summary gave me an answer. It may be the wrong one, but I looked it up out of curiosity, so it doesn’t ultimately matter.

        • By jxjnskkzxxhx 2025-06-1821:53

          > It may be the wrong one, but I looked it up out of curiosity, so it doesn’t ultimately matter.

          Now this has to be the most surprising thing I've read this week, until I thought about it for long.

          It doesn't matter if it's correct because you googled it out of curiosity? I think you might be confused. When you're curious, you want the answer to be correct (there's related questions that are raised and consistency checks that a curious person does in their mind.) I think what you are is addicted to the internet. You searched something because that's you brain's kneejerk reaction to whatever the trigger was in this case. The act of searching is what your brain was looking for, not the actual information.

        • By nicoburns 2025-06-191:20

          Its accuracy is around 50% for queries I do, which is low enough that I actually consider it a negative to my experience using Google, and has made me think about looking for a different search engine for the first time.

      • By southernplaces7 2025-06-1818:35

        >even if its reputation was still clean.

        That's a good laugh...

    • By pupppet 2025-06-1822:34

      I disagree, it's a short-sighted decision. We want our sites to be visited, they've disincentivize users from adding new content.

HackerNews