Larry Summers resigns from OpenAI board

2025-11-1913:16334376www.cnbc.com

Details about Summers' communications with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein were made public last week.

Larry Summers, president emeritus and professor at Harvard University, at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, on Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2025. 

Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers said Wednesday that he will resign from the board of OpenAI after the release of emails between him and the notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Summers had announced Monday that he would be stepping back from all public commitments, but it was not immediately clear whether that included his position at the artificial intelligence startup.

"I am grateful for the opportunity to have served, excited about the potential of the company, and look forward to following their progress," Summers said in a statement to CNBC. 

OpenAI's board told CNBC it respects Summers' decision to resign.

"We appreciate his many contributions and the perspective he brought to the Board," the OpenAI board of directors said in a statement.

Details of Summers' correspondence with Epstein were made public last week after the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee released more than 20,000 documents it obtained pursuant to a subpoena from Epstein's estate. Summers has faced intense scrutiny following the release of those files.

Summers joined OpenAI's board in 2023 during a turbulent period for the startup. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman was briefly ousted from the company, though he returned to the chief executive role days later. 

In the wake of "The Blip," as some OpenAI employees call it, Summers was appointed to the board alongside Bret Taylor, former co-CEO of Salesforce, and Quora CEO Adam D'Angelo, who was the only member of OpenAI's previous board who still held a seat.

Axios was first to report about Summers' resignation from the board.

House overwhelmingly votes to release more Epstein investigation files, sends bill to Senate

Read the original article

Comments

  • By koolba 2025-11-1913:194 reply

    In related news, Harvard is also launching its own investigation into its former president Summers: https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2025/11/19/harvard-opens-...

    • By bn-l 2025-11-202:423 reply

      I find it hard to believe that they’re only finding out now.

      • By safety1st 2025-11-206:24

        The thing to understand about Summers is that he is basically the guy that charted the course to where America is today.

        Enormously influential, he provided the intellectual gravitas as well as the raw policymaking muscle for a version of the US economy that was financialized, globalized, and monopolized.

        If you're broke in 2025, Larry Summers probably had something to do with it.

        Anything that will knock this guy down many many pegs is worthwhile imo.

      • By epistasis 2025-11-205:351 reply

        I don't think anybody knew the extent of relationships with Epstein that were revealed when 20k email messages were dumped onto the world.

        I have long been a hater of Summers, but had no indication that he was involved with Epstein like this. I could understand others at Harvard not knowing, unless they had access to Summers' personal email somehow.

        Chomsky, another person who I have long hated (for setting back linguistics with his extreme bullying, the dominance of bad theory, and the resistance to actually studying languages before they go extinct, etc etc etc). And though I knew there was some connection to Epstein, as many intellectuals had connections to him, I had no idea it was to that extent.

        All this is to say that even opponents of Epstein's confidants didn't know the extent of connection, and I'm not surprised that others are Harvard didn't know.

        • By watwut 2025-11-2010:48

          I mean, there are other harward people making very similar consultations with Epstein. It seems to be more of "influencial harward people support each other" situation.

          Plus, there are harward people who complained about these harward people for years and claim to not be surprised.

      • By FridgeSeal 2025-11-205:16

        Better to be _seen_ to be doing something later, than to have it pointed out.

    • By senderista 2025-11-1923:011 reply

      OMG the correspondence described there is disgusting: Summers seeking advice from Epstein on how to turn a mentoring relationship into a romantic one.

    • By pessimizer 2025-11-1918:435 reply

      MIT and NYT need to get back on it, too. Lots of people still not feeling any consequences, much like Epstein during life. The girls were threatened more than he ever was (and still are.)

      It seems like the NYT was cackling in glee just a couple months ago, saying that even Trump had to finally buck the conspiracy theories of his evil, ignorant MAGA followers and admit that there was absolutely nothing to see and nothing interesting about the Epstein case and it's actually silly that you would think there was. Nice that MAGA demands accountability from Trump in a way Democrats don't from their leaders.

      It's also telling that the NYT is the only major outlet to consistently be reticent to state unequivocally that Epstein killed himself. Always said "found to have committed suicide." Somebody there with editorial veto control knows that flimsy story isn't going to last forever. Even if he hadn't been made cellmates with an insane strangler murder cop with nothing to lose, hadn't said that the "suicide attempt" was insane murder cop trying to kill him, and was taken off suicide watch one day after that "suicide attempt."

      The night Jeffrey Epstein claimed his cellmate tried to kill him, CBS News 2025/09/22

      https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-epstein-claimed-cellmat...

      Nicholas Tartaglione

      https://www.lohud.com/story/news/crime/2019/09/23/feds-how-n...

      [edit: re Tartaglione, who never had the slightest chance of ever getting out of prison. Has anybody checked if the financial situation of his family changed for the better since the incident?]

      • By ternaryoperator 2025-11-1922:52

        > It's also telling that the NYT is the only major outlet to consistently be reticent to state unequivocally that Epstein killed himself. Always said "found to have committed suicide."

        Nonsense. "...Mr. Epstein, who died by suicide... [0] "...disgraced financier who died by suicide...[1] etc.

        [0] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/18/us/politics/trump-epstein... [1] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein...

      • By hn_throwaway_99 2025-11-200:413 reply

        > Nice that MAGA demands accountability from Trump in a way Democrats don't from their leaders.

        What planet do you live on?? I don't see any blowback against Trump himself from MAGA followers. It's always "he's getting bad advice", or they blame his sycophants like Bondi. If MAGA demanded accountability from Trump they seemed to be totally fine when he was caught boasting on tape of committing sexual assault.

        • By trts 2025-11-200:471 reply

          not sure where you are looking but Rasmussen polls have been showing Trump hemorrhaging support since June among his base. if you visit X this is where many of them converse, and they are quite openly unhappy with the admin lately

          • By irjustin 2025-11-201:012 reply

            I believe it has nothing to do with sexual offense and that the higher prices of goods is really affecting people.

            So he's still immune the anything that's horrendous.

            • By EasyMark 2025-11-204:16

              I think most people are talking to the core 30-40% of his voters see him as messianic that will go down with the titanic no matter what

            • By trts 2025-11-201:051 reply

              guess you can believe what you want but data shows the Epstein topic has been damaging his base support

              • By shigawire 2025-11-204:17

                Some indicators suggest that, but we don't really know until the rubber meets the road.

                The real test is how people vote. With this much confusion I think it is perfectly valid to take a few opinion polls with a grain of salt.

                Much like how Dems rate their party poorly but still turn it against Trump, I'm not sure MAGA discontent with have any real impact on elections.

        • By ipaddr 2025-11-200:551 reply

          MAGA will follow Trump off a bridge. The America First collective pushed for this and many of them have given up on Trump.

          • By EasyMark 2025-11-204:15

            This is what I expect as well, the cultish members will never see him for what he is no matter what happens. I've seen similar sentiment toward dictators in other countries as well, especially if you talk to the older civilians who really bought into the system, even years after the dictator was overthrown.

        • By t-3 2025-11-203:31

          There has been a very public split between MTG and Trump in the past week or so over the Epstein issue. It has been causing a rift in the MAGA base for a while though, it seems to be coming to a head now though.

      • By cosmicgadget 2025-11-201:53

        > Trump had to finally buck the conspiracy theories of his evil, ignorant MAGA followers and admit that there was absolutely nothing to see and nothing interesting about the Epstein case and it's actually silly that you would think there was.

        Didn't Bondi say there was thousands of hours of video of sex abuse? Was that made up?

      • By lo_zamoyski 2025-11-1923:012 reply

        > Nice that MAGA demands accountability from Trump in a way Democrats don't from their leaders.

        This doesn't accord with experience. MAGA is notorious for rationalizing anything Trump says or does.

        The uniparty is a rotten, spiraling race to the bottom.

        • By yahoozoo 2025-11-1923:053 reply

          [flagged]

          • By DonHopkins 2025-11-2117:21

            FYI: Your account has been shadow banned for repeated antisemitic posts, and you deserve it. So stop wasting your time trying to post. And don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.

          • By overfeed 2025-11-205:261 reply

            MAGA was pushing for it when they believed it was a liberal conspiracy, with the Clintons trafficking children and "harvesting their adrenochrome" (see Comet Pizza incident). Now MAGA luminaries are suggesting grown men abusing minors isn't that creepy if the victims are teenaged - so much for protecting the kids.

            • By lo_zamoyski 2025-11-2016:53

              "Hypocrisy is okay if we do it, because they did it first!"

          • By DonHopkins 2025-11-200:021 reply

            Only because Trump told them to push it first. His problem is that he changed his mind.

        • By mrcsharp 2025-11-200:301 reply

          Then you're in a bubble.

          • By bilbo0s 2025-11-201:213 reply

            Not to put too fine a point on it, but you both are in a bubble.

            They're just different bubbles.

            Liberals and conservatives have methodically and deliberately avoided holding their leaders accountable for decades. The only people who can't see that, are, frankly, liberals and conservatives.

            What we have now is an opportunity to sweep everyone from Trump on down out of office. Anyone who would work for Trump or Clinton should have their judgement questioned at a minimum. And they should pray we don't look any further into what they've been getting up to.

            This is a golden opportunity to scrub the walls clean and put in new people en masse. But I'm not naive. I know the corruption of the incumbent power brokers and parties will undoubtedly win the day. You can bet your bottom dollar that conservatives and liberals are cooperating and they've got the courts, Homeland security, CIA, everything.. out cleaning up for them. I just wish they'd get what's coming to them for once.

            • By shigawire 2025-11-204:19

              The Dems have the progressive caucus primarying moderate candidates constantly. The GOP has Massey and Paul

            • By rustystump 2025-11-202:05

              Thank you!

              Cannot count the number of times people forget how powerful algorithmic bubble making is. It isnt a “you are in a bubble so ur dumb” it is more of, “all of our information is algorithmically fed to us be aware!”

              To add to this, I have a friend who has two kids. One is lefty trans and the other is becoming a christian conservative. They are Indian zoomers. Two totally different algorithms at work. One got the Charlie and the other got Hassan. Really makes one wonder what is in your own information feed.

            • By lo_zamoyski 2025-11-2017:03

              > you both are in a bubble.

              I did say the "uniparty", right? So on what basis do you make this claim?

              In case you're not familiar with the term, it refers to both the Republicans and the Democrats, viewing them as effectively one party with two factions (with the former merely trailing behind the latter, typically).

              In this particular case, MAGA is showing that it's okay with hypocrisy, because, hey, didn't Democrats rationalize Clinton's misdeeds and throw his victims under the bus for the sake of the party?

              So, yes, the uniparty is rotten.

      • By 650REDHAIR 2025-11-1923:241 reply

        Isn’t NYT complicit and sat on a lot of Epstein files before the 2016 election.

        • By bilbo0s 2025-11-201:30

          Um..

          Just throwing it out there, but forget Epstein, I'm sure most of us would not believe what NYT is sitting on in general. This is effectively a defacto global intelligence gathering service. I bet if we could read through a lot of that we'd all be gobsmacked and just stop believing in humanity altogether.

          I understand most of what we haven't seen is uncorroborated, but it would still make for interesting reading if we didn't have to worry about falling down an elevator shaft onto some bullets.

    • By benzible 2025-11-201:43

      The one-time head of the most elite academic institution as well as the US Treasury is an insecure 12 year old boy at heart. Summers clearly saw Epstein as aspirational for his "success" with "women". But this isn't really new information about him. In 2005 he went in front of an audience including top women scientists at the National Bureau of Economic Research and essentially said the lack of women at the top of science was mostly about their lack of innate aptitude, not discrimination [1] (he gave multiple alternate "theories" but it was clear which one he actually believed). People immediately saw that for what it was: a powerful guy projecting his own hang-ups about women. That he's maintained his status over the last 20 years does not speak well of the US's most prestigious institutions.

      https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2005/2/18/full-transcript...

  • By etc-hosts 2025-11-202:133 reply

    A nice list of Summers' many crimes from over 10 years ago:

    https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/07/why-larry-summers-sh...

    • By addy34 2025-11-203:142 reply

      Let's not forget this gem in a memo from Summers:

      >Dirty' Industries: Just between you and me, shouldn't the World Bank be encouraging MORE migration of the dirty industries to the LDCs [Least Developed Countries]? I can think of three reasons...

      ...I think the economic logic behind dumping a load of toxic waste in the lowest wage country is impeccable and we should face up to that...

      ...I've always thought that under-populated countries in Africa are vastly UNDER-polluted

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summers_memo

      • By snthpy 2025-11-206:37

        Thank you for that tldr. Wow

    • By 7e 2025-11-202:272 reply

      What laws were broken here?

      • By idiotsecant 2025-11-203:081 reply

        Parent post is being metaphorical. In this case you can read 'many crimes' as 'many incredibly, unbelievably stupid decisions'. Hope that helps

        • By 7e 2025-11-203:581 reply

          No, the parent comment is just false and possibly libelous. Hope that helps.

          • By etc-hosts 2025-11-204:50

            Any former resident of Soviet Union thinks Larry Summers is huge crime

      • By amanaplanacanal 2025-11-202:56

        Sounds more like incompetence.

    • By alex1138 2025-11-202:201 reply

      [flagged]

  • By Teever 2025-11-1915:5211 reply

    There's an interesting list of criticisms about Larry Summers here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15320922

    Based on an interview that I've seen of him a few years ago and these emails between him and Epstein he seems kind of... not smart?

    It raises a really interesting question which is how do people like him climb so high up the ladder?

    • By GolfPopper 2025-11-1918:03

      Telling people in power what they want to hear.

      I listened to an interview with Summers in the run-up to the 2007-8 financial crisis, and what he was doing was obvious to any grade school student who has ever witnessed someone else sucking up to an authority figure.

    • By Finnucane 2025-11-1918:09

      The bond deal he made to pay for Harvard's Allston campus expansion blew up in the crash and nearly bankrupted the university. It takes a special kind of genius to bankrupt Harvard.

    • By m463 2025-11-1921:32

      > how do people like him climb so high up the ladder?

      I think about things like this...

      Some people enjoy watching horror movies, and some people don't. Some people enjoy watching game of thrones, and others don't.

      And I know a lot of smart people disengage from politics because it is a big mess.

      In the same way, I think lots of people on and around the ladder disengage in the same way, and these people rise (and feel empowered).

      I also remember reading how steve jobs would figure out if someone was a good employee. He would go to their coworkers and say "I hear xxx is shit". If people would defend xxx, then maybe he was ok, while if they didn't say much, maybe xxx was shit.

      so... this might be the pattern.

    • By AlexandrB 2025-11-1921:32

      > It raises a really interesting question which is how do people like him climb so high up the ladder?

      I think ladder climbing is its own skill only loosely correlated with intelligence.

    • By protocolture 2025-11-1923:31

      >It raises a really interesting question which is how do people like him climb so high up the ladder?

      From experience, every dumb as rocks leader eventually gets tired of hearing that they are doing the wrong thing and finds someone who agrees with them completely, ie, as dumb or dumber than they are.

    • By profsummergig 2025-11-1918:161 reply

      Someone (maybe Charlie Munger) said that the presence of a woman he has lust for reduces a man's IQ by 20 points.

      Seems anecdotally true.

    • By lapcat 2025-11-1918:232 reply

      > It raises a really interesting question which is how do people like him climb so high up the ladder?

      The real world is not a meritocracy. Awful, greedy, immoral people protect and promote each other. They also have an insatiable appetite for power, status, and wealth. You're rewarded for playing the game, for lying, and especially for keeping terrible secrets.

      • By octoberfranklin 2025-11-1923:271 reply

        I know we're never going to fix this problem, but it's depressing how we seem to have made zero or negative progress on it.

        • By lapcat 2025-11-200:38

          I wouldn't say we've made zero progress. There are always ups and downs, temporary wins and losses, but I think that over the long term, there's more skepticism and scrutiny now than in the past.

      • By bamboozled 2025-11-1921:512 reply

        I think this is a side effect of having "paid law enforcement", it's not that the cops are bad, but their bosses are. The people who fund the law enforcement are ultimately at the mercy of the "rich and powerful" in some way or another, so basically people of a certain status get a pass.

        It might look different if tax payers funded Law enforcement via different means, but it would never be allowed to happen, by,,,the elites.

        • By octoberfranklin 2025-11-1923:30

          It used to be that any citizen could approach a grand jury and allege a crime. The purpose of the grand jury was to decide if tax dollars should be spent to hire a prosecutor for that (single) case.

          "Public Prosecutor" wasn't a salaried job with the power to effectively pardon people by not filing charges. It was a contract job to prosecute a single case.

          It's very depressing what grand juries have been turned into.

        • By lupire 2025-11-200:59

          Why pays cops and orders then to pick fights with innocent people

    • By FireBeyond 2025-11-1921:241 reply

      > Based on an interview that I've seen of him a few years ago and these emails between him and Epstein he seems kind of... not smart?

      "Funnily", if you read Epstein's contributions to a lot of his emails, he also gives off that same vibe.

      • By jonny_eh 2025-11-1921:28

        Don't get me started on Trump

    • By bamboozled 2025-11-1921:48

      They know they above the law from the minute that reach a certain level of status, they don't care about the emails and if people see them, they know there will be next to zero repercussions for them.

    • By JKCalhoun 2025-11-1916:221 reply

      What do you mean? I assumed he was cozied up to by the likes of Epstein because he had already ascended the ladder.

      I see, because you think he's "not smart"… Yeah, I think "smart" and "makes smart choices" are two different things.

      • By Teever 2025-11-1918:252 reply

        According to wikipedia:

        > Summers's ties to Epstein reportedly began "a number of years...before Summers became Harvard's president and even before he was the Secretary of the Treasury."[59] Flight records introduced as evidence in the 2021 trial of Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell show that Summers flew on Jeffrey Epstein's private plane on at least four occasions, including once in 1998 when Summers was United States Deputy Secretary of the Treasury and at least three times while Harvard president.

        And on the wikipedia page of Summers' wife:

        > In an email to Epstein released in 2025 by the House Oversight Committee, New mentioned a recorded but unreleased episode of Poetry in America featuring Woody Allen, who was introduced to New by Epstein. In an email to Epstein, New mentioned she would reread Lolita (a book Epstein was known to have by his bedside) and, separately, recommended he read My Ántonia by Willa Cather, describing both as stories of 'a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young girl[20][21].

        I recently listened to a podcast about Robert Maxwell[0], the father of Ghislaine Maxwell and in the second part of the podcast they went into great detail about Maxwell's publishing empire and how he apparently started the modern academic publishing industry as we know it.

        It seems like Epstein learned from Maxwell's father the technique of finding academics who have desirable resources whether they be intellectual or social and then cultivating relationships with them by offering them what they always wanted but never felt they had be it academic recognition from peers in the form of positions at journals or conferences or dates/sex with young beautiful women and/or girls.

        Attention from peers and women/girls is like a kryptonite to nerds like Larry Summers, his wife, or Marvin Minsky and Epstein was able to parlay that influence on these nerds to influence the wealthy and powerful.

        But the question of how Summers got into the position that he found himself in still remains. You listen to the man speak and he isn't very smart. He continued a personal relationship with a convicted pedophile and sought dating advice from this person. The more you dig into this Summers guy and his wife the more you realize they're just... dumb.

        As an outsider looking in I'm starting to wonder if this world is just a bunch of academically capable but socially stunted individuals being preyed on by socially voracious people like Epstein with no morals?

        [0] https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/part-one-robert-maxwel...

        • By AlexandrB 2025-11-2013:56

          Reminds me of the pictures[1] of Stephen Hawking on Epsten's island. Depressing stuff.

          [1] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/stephen-hawking/113...

        • By edbaskerville 2025-11-1920:541 reply

          > As an outsider looking in I'm starting to wonder if this world is just a bunch of academically capable but socially stunted individuals being preyed on by socially voracious people like Epstein with no morals?

          The present-day tech world seems like a pretty extreme version of this phenomenon. Many of our sociopaths (e.g., Musk, Zuckerberg) got a boost from actual technical abilities along the way, which I suppose is similar to Epstein—he seems to have been pretty talented at finance.

          (Edit: Musk and Zuckerberg are not socially talented in the usual sense, but have still been extremely successful at getting other people to do what they want.)

          • By fakedang 2025-11-1922:161 reply

            On what basis do you say that Epstein was pretty talented at finance? This guy was a math teacher with no actual degree. The only reason he got his gig in finance was by schmoozing up the dad of one of his students, who was CEO of Bear Stearns.

            The only talents Epstein really had were in cozying up the right people at the right time with the "right" stuff (which we all know about now).

    • By add-sub-mul-div 2025-11-1918:033 reply

      He's a pretty terrible asshole, but being dumb isn't the same thing as being wrong about economics. I'm not dumb, but I shouldn't be trusted to make economy-level decisions. Humility is underrated.

      • By benhill70 2025-11-1918:29

        He just supported the status quo. Look how much money he lost during the 2008 crisis.

        Summers is just weather vane for current economic thinking. He's not a particularly brilliant at anything.

      • By Finnucane 2025-11-1918:09

        When has he been right about economics?

      • By antonvs 2025-11-203:44

        Sounds like you might have bought into some baseless PR.

HackerNews