Windows GUI – Good, Bad and Pretty Ugly (2023)

2025-11-255:3372165creolened.com

Windows launched way back in 1985, when I was still using a Commodore 64 and PCs were all of four years old–barely out of diapers. The GUI or Graphical User Interface, has changed a lot over the years…

Windows launched way back in 1985, when I was still using a Commodore 64 and PCs were all of four years old–barely out of diapers. The GUI or Graphical User Interface, has changed a lot over the years and I thought it might be fun/horrifying to rank every major version of the Windows GUI, from Windows 1.0 in 1985, to Windows 11 as of 2023.

I’m rating not based on how the system looked at the time (you can do only do so much with CGA/EGA graphics, after all), but how they look now. Is this fair? Probably not, but as always, I make the rules!

The rating system is based on a scale of 1 to 10 Clippys, with 10 being best.

NOTE: I am skipping over all versions of Windows NT because it follows the look of other versions mentioned below.

Overall Rankings:

  1. Windows 11
  2. Windows 2000
  3. Windows 95/98/Vista/7
  4. Windows 10
  5. Windows 3.0/3.1/XP
  6. Windows 8.1
  7. Windows 8
  8. Windows 2.0
  9. Windows 1.0

Windows 1.0 (1985)
Rating: 1 Clippy

In 1985, Windows ran on top of DOS, had drop-down menus, fixed windows, and CGA graphics. In a way, the extremely limited colour palette actually made it more colourful. Perhaps too colourful. This is pretty ugly all around. If you are a fan of this, you probably wear plaid bow ties unironically.

  • Windows 3.0
  • Windows 95
  • Windows Vista
  • Windows 11
  • The ones that struck out were:

    The early versions (1.0 and 2.0) were hamstrung by the technology at the time, while Windows 10 had to pick up the pieces from Windows 8.

    Rumours say Microsoft is working on Windows 12. If so, I wouldn’t expect it to depart visually from Windows 11, but you never know.


    Read the original article

    Comments

    • By patapong 2025-11-2515:234 reply

      One underappreciated thing about Windows 8 is that even if the start menu was ugly and blocked the entire screen, you could press the windows key, immediately start typing, and then press enter to somewhat deterministically pick the top app. This made it feel quite fast.

      Now on more recent windows editions, I find that I often need to wait for the menu to visually appear before it will accept any keyboard input, and the ranking shifts over time and includes web stuff, making this workflow basically useless.

      I also really miss the aero look of windows 7... Eye-candy, sure, but I thought it was pretty, clean and modern looking. I am sad they moved away from it.

      • By miffy900 2025-11-2522:24

        That was exactly the same behaviour in Windows 7 though; it wasn't exactly novel. At least Windows 7 searched your apps, and documents all at once. Windows 8 limited you to just apps. Windows 8 was a huge step down in usability.

      • By coldpie 2025-11-2516:223 reply

        > One underappreciated thing about Windows 8 is that even if the start menu was ugly and blocked the entire screen, you could press the windows key, immediately start typing, and then press enter to somewhat deterministically pick the top app. This made it feel quite fast.

        Decent operating systems support this, and have for decades. macOS has the spotlight search (cmd-space), and most Linux DEs have some form of it too (eg XFCE's appfinder).

        • By avn2109 2025-11-2517:191 reply

          OSX's command-space spotlight search has been degrading functionally (at least on my machines) for literally years now. It peaked around ~2012, when it would reliably search the full text of all documents on my local hard drive quickly, and not do anything dumb like "search the internet by sending whatever I typed up into the search field to the cloud."

          Nowadays it fails to reliably search the full text of documents on my local hard drive, tries to search the internet despite my best efforts to prevent this, and often even fails to find a file ~/Documents/foo.txt when I explicitly search for the string foo.txt. This is uniformly true on several work Macbooks and a couple personal macbooks too.

          A truly astounding regression in functionality!

          • By itsn0tm3 2025-11-2519:48

            I truly hate it! Why not use Raycast or Alfred?

        • By 1718627440 2025-11-2522:34

          A Shell (the UNIX one not the Windows term), is basically nothing other than this, with more features added.

        • By tracker1 2025-11-2516:292 reply

          Most Linux DE's it's even the same use of the Super/Win hotkey by itself. I do wish Linux distros would add an emoji picker with the Suler+. hotkey (matching Windows')... When it's there, I always forget the hotkey, same on mac for that matter.

          • By derkades 2025-11-2517:19

            KDE has Super+.

          • By ta8903 2025-11-2517:19

            Bind it yourself?

            Also I'm pretty sure default Gnome and KDE include emojis in their "start" menu search, which is its own kind of annoying.

      • By hbn 2025-11-2517:331 reply

        I don't even bother using the start menu to sleep my PC anymore. I used to hit Win, then navigate with arrow keys to sleep, but at one point an update broke it so you couldn't navigate to the power menu with arrow keys. I don't know if it's fixed now, but regardless it's way faster to hit

        Win+x -> u -> s

        • By c-hendricks 2025-11-2518:15

          Bonus is this goes back to like Windows 95 (albeit there was no Sleep option back then).

      • By CommonGuy 2025-11-2517:31

        Yes the start menu is now very slow with the web stuff enabled.

        If you disable it, it becomes snappy again. Pretty crazy to me that Microsoft allows the default option to be that slow

    • By derleyici 2025-11-256:508 reply

      8 for Windows 11? An OS that includes ads in the Start menu, made with React. I'm not even mentioning right-click, which has basically two views: you open it and see some uselessly chosen tools, and you still need to open the old version (with the old design, breaking design consistency) to access actually useful things. Viva Windows XP!

      • By sunaookami 2025-11-2516:123 reply

        It's not made in React, only the "recommended" section is made with React Native which compiles to native XAML. No web technologies involved. And yes I will debunk this every time I see it :) .

        • By calmingsolitude 2025-11-2519:14

          Here's the problem: your reply is factually correct, but it doesn't address the GP's overarching complaint - the start menu is simply not performant. And since the code powering the start menu is closed source, it is not possible to perform a benchmark to see if the react native portion of the start menu is to blame or if it is something else.

        • By the_overseer 2025-11-2517:311 reply

          It's slower. It's laggy. The taskbar and menus need to be native code of the highest optimization. Anything less than instantaneous means that PMs, managers, coders and everyone there should not have a job working on OSes if they can't get this simple idea through their thick skulls.

          • By hbn 2025-11-2517:384 reply

            I've shared this on HN before, but starting with Windows 11, they seemingly started making the new UI essentially a separate process that runs on top of the existing Windows 10 UI and just modifies it.

            I learned this from a video where a guy was seeing how much of the Program Files folder you can delete before Windows breaks, and at some point it reverts to the Windows 10 UI.

            https://youtu.be/BVIN_PJu2rs?t=565

            • By sunaookami 2025-11-2518:01

              They also don't run animations in a separate process since Windows 10 which means that under high load everything lags. In Windows 8.1 everything was buttery smooth thanks to DirectUI. macOS and iOS also run animations separately.

            • By z500 2025-11-2519:02

              I got so frustrated with how slow the file explorer got after my work laptop updated. Turns out the new UI is just shell extensions, if you add registry keys to redirect them to non-existent paths you get the old file explorer back.

            • By mghackerlady 2025-11-2518:01

              Isn't this how pretty much every evolution of windows design has worked? at least from what I remember the windows 10 ui is built on top of aero (though admittedly I don't use windows and have never interacted with it for anything serious)

            • By the_overseer 2025-11-2517:58

              This is even more insane than I thought. Truly madness. Everybody involved with that should be fired and sent to the moon as an experiment on how long does the human body survive naked on both the dark side and the bright side of the moon. At least we will learn something from those experiments.... (it's a joke but the point stands. Those people shouldn't ever be allowed to touch computers.)

        • By mghackerlady 2025-11-2517:591 reply

          It doesn't matter, JShit doesn't belong anywhere but the browser and even there it's on thin ice. People have gotten way too comfortable with using a shit language for everything because the FANG overlords demand more JShit code monkeys for their tracker infested websites

          • By dajtxx 2025-11-2521:03

            Don't kwow why you're getting downvoted, seems like a reasonable comment to me.

            I agree, JavaScript and all it has enabled is a curse.

            If one wanted the good bits of JavaScript I'm sure there are languages they were copied from that could be used instead.

      • By cocoa19 2025-11-257:051 reply

        With that move to React or whatever web based monstrosity it is, it lost a lot of the existing user experience crafted over the years.

        Not only OS pre-installed apps are much slower, but it broke shortcuts and common sense behaviors.

        • By speedgoose 2025-11-257:211 reply

          It’s not web but react native.

          • By felixgallo 2025-11-2515:372 reply

            Whatever product manager team decided to jump into React Native with both feet for the Windows experience needs to be ejected from the industry permanently. Think of how many thousands of human hours per day are now spent waiting on React Native jank, all in order to save the Windows developers from having to program in Windows using Microsoft products.

            • By the_overseer 2025-11-2517:37

              Most likely saving Windows developers from learning programming. They are just javascript monkeys because that is what Microsoft is hiring these days and you can't trust monkeys with native C++. The thing would leak memory and explode immediately if those idiots tried to write native code. So in the name of hiring cheap idiots that can't program we all have to put up with this slow, bloated garbage.

              There is no universe in which I should see lag between a click and a menu appearing in File explorer, taskbar or anywhere in the OS. Not on a machine with 8 idling cores.

            • By tracker1 2025-11-2516:361 reply

              MS could/should have just made other XAML/MAUI options a better experience in general over the React Native thing... It might be different if they actually embrace web as a whole and at least gave a consistent UX, more like say WebOS or ChromeOS, but that's not what they're doing here.

              What MS really needs to do is create a really long checklist of all the UI defained configurations and options, along with a connected list of all the relevant API interfaces they connect to... then come up with a consistent, complete and competent component library to do a ground up re-implementation of all the things in a consistent way.

              This would, of course mean stabilizing the released version of windows to mostly bug fixes for a couple years while frantically generating and dog-fooding the new UX... starting with a re-revamped task manager, and launcher/file-picker. Just a bare desktop and a hotkey that opens task manager as the first and only UI elements then working out from there.

              • By dajtxx 2025-11-2521:05

                It's a nice thought but think of the cost!

                You do have to wonder what the hell the people in charge of the Windows UI are thinking. They seem to have got it so badly wrong. But so has Apple in macos.

      • By zootboy 2025-11-256:573 reply

        But this article is only grading the styling of the OS GUI elements, not the functionality (or lack thereof) of the OS itself.

        • By dijit 2025-11-257:351 reply

          Windows 11 is far from the best at that though.

          It doesn’t even look good.

          I know taste is subjective, but a better comparison is the contemporaries of the time or at least taking a step back to consider the entire aesthetic.

          If so, ironically, I think Vista should win.

          • By mghackerlady 2025-11-2518:08

            one thing I think windows 11 does well is the icon design. The kinda glassy look they have is the perfect middle ground between the glossy hyperrealistic icons of yesteryear and the bland lifeless minimalist icons that became common after ios 7

        • By derleyici 2025-11-257:381 reply

          Fair point, but the article praises Windows 11 for "cohesion" while the right-click menu literally has two different visual styles, and many system apps still use old UI. Even judging purely on aesthetics, that's inconsistent.

          • By reddalo 2025-11-257:431 reply

            On the surface, Explorer looks more modern on Windows 11. But when you use it, you can "feel" it's still based on old Win32 APIs with just a layer of paint on top.

            • By nullpoint420 2025-11-257:49

              IMO, in a good way. It has a nice feel compared to the new laggy context menus and selections

        • By eitland 2025-11-2510:10

          They actually do mention bloatware in Windows 11, so it is a bit confused.

      • By bbzylstra 2025-11-2516:41

        You can use winutil to replace the new start menu with the old one. I think the option is in "advanced tweaks".

        https://github.com/ChrisTitusTech/winutil

      • By wlesieutre 2025-11-257:052 reply

        When you hit print screen, it takes a screenshot, waits a blatantly visible number of frames while you type more letters or stuff keeps moving on screen, and then eventually rewinds time by overlaying the now outdated screenshot for you to select a target area

        Pressing escape can sometimes cancel out of this overlay (in case you bumped print screen by accident). But sometimes it doesn’t, because the full screen overlay in front of everything has managed to lose keyboard focus, and you need to click on it before it can respond to keyboard input.

        Godawful trash OS and I hate that I’m stuck working on it.

        • By nananana9 2025-11-2516:252 reply

          On my very rasonably spec'd laptop it often takes 20 seconds for the snipping tool selection to pop up. Video recording is very nice though, definitely my favorite feature.

          New Notepad had a broken typematic that took them 2 years to fix, but they added Copilot at the same patch. Resizing its window still rapidly still flickers and can max the CPU.

          If you're using labels in the taskbar the buttons aren't fixed width, they resize to fit the window title - except that until recently they didnt, so if you cd from C:\ to a longer path you got the label "C...". That one is fixed, but not the one where I switch desktops with Ctrl+Alt+arrows and the entries have no icons.

          If you have a folder with lots of audio files, sometimes explorer.exe will hang for 30 seconds while it dutifully extracts artist metadata (no way to disable). Possibly an old issue, but I've never hit it before.

          Search is even worse than before, I have "alacrity.exe" both in PATH and as a shortcut on desktop, but when I type "alacr" I get a web suggestion until I fully type it out. "Visual..." toggles between VSCode and fat visual studio on every keypress.

          I can't express my opinion on the Task Manager changes without using language inapropriate for this forum.

          Those are my issues off the top of my head, if I record every single broken thing I see for a week this list would be way longer.

          That's just the stuff that doesn't work, there's a similarly long list of things that work but are evil.

          • By throwaway_4747 2025-11-2523:07

            To add to your list, if you open the start menu and type “add or remove” it will not bring up the add or remove programs section in the settings menu. It will only give an internet search. To uninstall a program you have to literally open the settings menu and search for the right section. In win 10 all you had to do was type “add” and it was the default selection.

          • By jansper39 2025-11-2517:15

            Wow, I hadn't realised it could do video as well. I installed a separate app for that purpose the other day.

            Just tested on my very anaemic 5 year old laptop, it loaded in about 2/3 seconds.

        • By isaacdl 2025-11-2515:211 reply

          I'm glad it's not just me struggling with the screenshot functionality. I've encountered the bugs you're describing, and recently, I've been encountering an incredibly frustrating one where hitting print screen just...doesn't do anything. The only way I've found to temporarily fix it is to manually open the Snipping Tool (via the Start menu) - then the print screen key starts working again for some indeterminate period of time.

          • By vel0city 2025-11-2515:462 reply

            Win+Shift+S. It launches the snipping tool. Its been a feature for over a decade.

            • By isaacdl 2025-11-2518:27

              FWIW, my print screen button does exactly the same thing, literally; it's opening the snipping tool in "select a region to screenshot" mode.

              This is a setting in Snipping Tool (called "Use the Print screen key to open Snipping Tool").

              When I encounter this bug, Win-Shift-S behaves identically (i.e. doesn't work).

            • By dessimus 2025-11-2516:18

              Especially since it can open with selecting the area to screenshot and not have to manually crop it in Paint or be sending a 4K image to someone.

      • By cuber_messenger 2025-11-256:593 reply

        IMHO the right-click menu these days seems to get better, at least I can find "Open with Code" or "Open in Terminal", etc. Except that I need the old menu to create a desktop shortcut occasionally.

        • By z500 2025-11-2519:10

          The new context menu is so awful. There is zero reason in this day and age for a context menu to take multiple seconds to pop up. They didn't even really improve on it in any meaningful way.

        • By dessimus 2025-11-2516:22

          In my Windows 11 right-click menu, I can choose "Show More Options" at the bottom and then Send To > Desktop (create shortcut).

        • By mcny 2025-11-257:451 reply

          I want to opt out though. I use 7 zip all the time and I don't want this menu that can't have 7 zip...

      • By blackhaz 2025-11-2515:13

        This is the most atrocious rating article I've stumbled upon in a while!

      • By dangus 2025-11-2515:143 reply

        Does the end user care that the system is made with React? What is the tangible negative impact?

        My start menu doesn’t have ads, it really isn’t hard to manage that sort of thing.

        OneDrive is fully uninstalled, Copilot is fully uninstalled, I find my system to be quite clean.

        And if you don’t like the start menu, there are ways to replace the start menu entirely with something else. Good luck replacing entire major elements of the macOS UI.

        In contrast, Apple puts advertisements at the same urgency level as critical system updates in the settings. There’s no setting to disable them and they sometimes come back with a new version release, you just have to know the magic actions to get them dismissed.

        Haters dog on Windows 11 for various things but it really is the best version of the OS since 7. It has some of the best updates to traditional Windows tooling in years: tabs in notepad, git preinstalled, finally the settings pane is in a good place, brand new command line interface, and Microsoft has had a great habit of putting new features in separate apps that can be installed optionally. (E.g., you can’t uninstall Apple News on a Mac, but you can uninstall ClipChamp on Windows)

        • By bigstrat2003 2025-11-2515:521 reply

          > My start menu doesn’t have ads, it really isn’t hard to manage that sort of thing.

          I don't care. It is completely unacceptable to have ads in a product I paid them for. It doesn't matter how easy it is to remove, that doesn't fly.

          You act like people are hating on Win11 for no reason, but truthfully you're just ignoring the reasons to hate it.

          • By dangus 2025-11-2516:131 reply

            I haven’t given Microsoft a dime since Windows 7. Users who buy a computer have the OS preinstalled. Millions of people never activate it. The product is effectively free.

            It’s a commercial OS but people can’t get over it. There isn’t a single commercial OS out there that doesn’t try to sell you something at some point.

            Maybe that is unacceptable to you and I respect you for that. But it’s a commercial OS and always has been.

            What gets annoying is when these aspects conflate it to being a bad OS or some monstrously unethical system. Seeing some ads that are easily disabled is treated by a certain community like the Microsoft is selling blood diamonds. The ferver doesn’t match the magnitude of the crime.

            • By the_overseer 2025-11-2518:01

              Preinstalled OS doesn't mean free OS. You already paid for it when you bought the computer. You shouldn't see ads. Ever.

        • By pavon 2025-11-2515:421 reply

          Windows 11 is much slower for me than Windows 7 or 10. A noticeable sub-second delay to bring up the start menu and respond to typing, about 3 seconds for file explorer to load, 5-20 seconds to start a screenshot. I wouldn't be surprised if antivirus is to partially to blame (only use Windows at work where it is required), but it is the same antivirus we used on Windows 10 and it wasn't this bad.

          • By dangus 2025-11-2516:271 reply

            “A noticeable sub-second delay” lol. I guess you never ran Windows 98 on a pentium 2 like I did. If I had a dime for every sub-second delay I experienced on that machine…

            Settings > Accessibility > Animation Effects > Off

            5-10 seconds to start a screenshot, yeah man now you’re just lying. You sure you didn’t leave the delay timer on?

            Are we going to gloss over the fact that the screenshot interface in old windows versions basically didn’t exist? There was no keyboard shortcut to open snipping tool by default in Windows 7. You had to know to use your print screen key correctly and to paste the image into Paint, and there was no visual feedback. Of course that performed fast because there was no UI!

            • By pavon 2025-11-2517:411 reply

              > I guess you never ran Windows 98 on a pentium 2 like I did.

              If you have to compare to a 20+ year old processor to look good, your system has problems. But since we are comparing old computers, Finder opens quicker on a 30 year old Macintosh 512k than Explorer opens in Windows 11.

              > 5-10 seconds to start a screenshot, yeah man now you’re just lying.

              Nope. I actually just updated that number up to 20 seconds after testing, because I thought my memory was exaggerating. This started in Windows 10 when they introduced "Snip & Sketch" to replace the old Snipping tool, but it was easier to go back to the old one in Windows 10.

              Edit: Oh, and I just remembered another detail. Our library folders are mapped to network shares at work. Again, this has been the case for 15+ years now, and performance has just recently cratered. It would not surprise me if most Windows developers today assume everything is on SSD, and don't think about slapping low-importance file I/O in critical sections.

        • By the_overseer 2025-11-2517:49

          I care that it's made with React/React Native or other garbage web frameworks. By definition adding layers between native C/C++ Native Win32 will make it slower and use more RAM.

          Stop justifying laziness and mediocrity. Microsoft does this just so they can hire cheap javascript monkeys out of colleges. AKA people who shouldn't be writing code and the reason a chat application now uses 1GB of RAM and nobody seems to care or understand why such waste is both bad and stupid.

    • By wackget 2025-11-2516:173 reply

      Giving Windows 11 the highest rating and XP one of the worst ratings clearly demonstrates that this author is not a serious person.

      • By joenot443 2025-11-2516:58

        I don't think it's meant to be taken seriously, at all. It's a pretty unserious surface level critique of past GUIs based on 2025 standards. It's a bit like ranking the Coolest Looking Batman's - there's not really an honest metric outside of ones personal favorite.

      • By arcanemachiner 2025-11-2516:391 reply

        Is everyone who disagrees with you an unserious person, or just on this particular topic?

        • By chasing0entropy 2025-11-2516:591 reply

          The disagreement isn't what makes him not serious; the hubris to declare Windows 11 the most usable OS does.

          No one who has any real experience with *nix, legacy ios, legacy Windows, and modern Windows/ios UI/UX would rate win11 top without serious qualifiers

          • By jasonvorhe 2025-11-2517:37

            Agreed. Something has to be wrong with you if you were to prefer Windows 11 to basically anything else. GNOME 3, Ubuntu's whatever desktop environment, KDE, Omarchy, macOS, Windows 8-10 - it's all more consistent, easier to grasp and also looks better than Windows 11.

      • By dagmx 2025-11-2516:283 reply

        Just because you disagree , doesn’t mean that your opinion holds any weight over theirs.

        Especially because you’ve provided no rebuttal of substance, and resorted to name calling.

        • By miffy900 2025-11-2522:45

          What name calling? Calling the author 'an unserious person' isn't name calling. Might be worth reading the article:

          > "If you like Windows 8’s look, you are a bad person. You are the one Steve Jobs was talking about when he said Microsoft had no taste."

          yeah you don't need to read very much of this to know this author hasn't exactly written a substantive article; they certainly aren't bothering to backup their claims with any reasoning. the whole post itself is 'this version of windows was ugly, this one wasn't etc'.

        • By chasing0entropy 2025-11-2516:571 reply

          Windows 11 usability is garbage compared to Windows 10. Windows 10 already had multiple desktops, docking(which does need app to augment), sandboxing, and the start menu worked. Further win 10 does not gimp the OS if not activated, doesn't require an online account, and has an identical update mechanism to win11.

          There is nothing superior or even functionally 'new' in Windows 11 besides compute burning eye candy and embedded backdoored encryption

          If Windows 7 had multi core enhancement, driver downloading, and updated libraries it would still be a superior OS from a weight of resources perspective.

          • By dagmx 2025-11-2520:57

            None of your points are relevant to the article at hand which is about the visual design of the OSs.

        • By amarant 2025-11-2517:013 reply

          GP has a point tho. The article ranks vista over XP, and that's just ludicrous. Even Microsoft has admitted that vista was hot garbage.

          It's even become a slang expression: a app can have a "Vista moment", meaning they released a version that was completely unusable and a stark regression from previous versions.

          Meanwhile XP is widely regarded to have been the best windows version ever. The only version that even compares in terms of popularity is 7.

          I get the feeling the author of the post hasn't actually used any of the older versions of windows, and was ranking solely based on some screenshots they found online. There's no other reasonable explanation for rating vista higher than XP.

          • By okanat 2025-11-2521:56

            Vista wasn't that bad from purely OS side. On a VM it runs pretty stable.

            However, Microsoft made a huge change to how the OS and drivers worked. If you still use Windows, you are still benefitting from some of the changes.

            However HW vendors usually ship rather broken drivers, it was doubly bad since Vista overhauled the driver interface. By the time all vendors fixed their shitty and badly tested drivers we already had 7. It is also partly Microsoft's fault since they had absolute chaos in Vista development due to shitty hacks on top of hacks that was the consumer OS (XP).

            Similarly Vista was very heavy for its contemporary average hardware. By the time HW caught up, 7 was released.

          • By dagmx 2025-11-2520:57

            What does anything you just said have to do with the article though, which specifically focuses on the UI?

          • By kube-system 2025-11-2517:14

            This article wasn’t ranking the quality of the OS overall, just the UI

    HackerNews