Spain fines Airbnb €65M: Why the government is cracking down on illegal rentals

2025-12-1814:49121152www.euronews.com

The fine is equal to six times the profits Airbnb made while the properties were still listed despite being in breach of the rules.

Spain has just drawn a hard line on short-term rentals.

The country has fined Airbnb €65 million for continuing to advertise short-term rental properties that were banned or lacked proper licences to operate.

The country’s consumer affairs ministry said the fine is final and ordered the US-based platform to remove the illegal listings immediately.

Officials said more than 65,000 Airbnb adverts breached Spanish consumer protection rules, including listing properties without licences or with licence numbers that did not match official registers.

The penalty is equal to six times the profits Airbnb made between when authorities warned the company about its offending listings and when they were taken down.

It also comes as pressure mounts on the government to curb tourist accommodation amid a deepening housing crisis, especially in major cities grappling with huge tourism numbers.

Why did Spain fine Airbnb?

According to the Spanish authorities, 65,122 Airbnb listings violated regulations designed to protect tenants and consumers.

Many of the properties were located in regions where short-term rentals are restricted or require explicit authorisation.

The consumer affairs ministry said platforms such as Airbnb are expected to check that properties advertised in Spain meet local and regional housing rules, including the use of valid licence numbers.

When they do not, it added, these rentals stay on the market longer than they should, which reduces the number of homes available to residents looking for long-term housing.

In a statement released by the consumer affairs ministry, consumer rights minister Pablo Bustinduy said there were “thousands of families who are living on the edge” because of the country’s housing crunch, while some companies were profiting from “business models that expel people from their homes”.

The crackdown has not been limited to Airbnb, either. In June, Spain also ordered Booking.com to remove more than 4,000 illegal accommodation listings.

Barcelona’s Airbnb ban and growing public anger in Spain

Barcelona has become the most visible flashpoint in Spain’s fight against short-term rentals.

This year, the city announced plans to phase out all tourist apartments by 2028, effectively banning platforms like Airbnb from operating private holiday rentals in residential buildings.

City officials argue that short-term rentals have hollowed out local neighbourhoods, pushed residents out of the rental market and reshaped entire districts around tourism.

Local communities have increasingly echoed those concerns, staging protests – from marches to impromptu water pistol attacks – against mass tourism and living costs.

Elsewhere in Spain, regional and national governments have followed a similar path.

Authorities recently removed more than 53,000 illegal tourist flats from official registers nationwide, the bulk of them in Andalusia, the Canary Islands, Catalonia and Valencia.

A record 94 million foreign tourists visited Spain in 2024. This year is on track to top that record.

While tourism remains an economic pillar, officials say tighter regulation of short-term rentals is essential to balance visitor growth with quality of life for local residents.


Read the original article

Comments

  • By asdfsfds 2025-12-1817:201 reply

    I live in Spain. I'll give you an interesting example I've witnessed. Two of my neighbors rent seasonally on airbnb. Middle class women, one of them a widow. I assume they used to make a tidy profit. I believe they worked quite hard on making those houses pretty, and I've seen they had good reviews. Just now their license to operate has been denied, apparently without much explanation (I believe the Property Registry is making the decision, this is a bureaucratic body of state employees, not democratically elected).

    Across the street lies a hotel, a true tourist trap. They have a 6/10 rating on booking and rely on scamming British tourists, whom you can see balancing drunk on their balconies daily. It's owned by a national conglomerate. As you may guess, as of now the airbnbs are closed and the hotel is thriving despite only bringing the worst kind of tourist to the community. An astute observer will note that the hotel industry is one of the biggest lobbyists supporting the current government at a national level. I am not one to defend big companies, but for some people here Airbnb was freedom. Now they have to go work cleaning rooms or just collect retirement checks, as obtaining a license to run a hotel is impossible without political connections / corruption. My point is, not everywhere are laws as fair as in the United States. Before someone talks about housing pressure, this is a relatively out of the way area where 40% of houses sit empty most of the year.

    • By foogazi 2025-12-1819:591 reply

      Can those drunk tourists not rent Airbnb's too ?

      How is it not better for them to stay across the street at the hotel than on a flat next to a family home ?

      • By asdfsfds 2025-12-1820:35

        The Airbnbs mentioned rented throughout the year in monthly periods, so they fill a different niche. The new law kills not only short term stays but everything that goes through an online provider (except multi-year contracts).

        When I first arrived here I relied on these long stay airbnbs until I could find a way through the byzantine Spanish rental process. Now this option will no longer exist.

        Again, you are not familiar with Spanish politics if you think this is by accident. I have myself given up on any attempts of doing business here after I spent 1 year waiting for a certain business license and could only obtain it (in a week) after a chance friendship with a local notary. :)

  • By MisterTea 2025-12-1816:139 reply

    I was in Spain this past summer and it certainly seems they are experiencing tourist burnout. I saw anti tourist messages on banners hung on buildings, graffiti, posters and stickers in Madrid and Barcelona. Some of it was a bit threatening but I had zero issues.

    The issue of airbnb is a sticky one. On one hand, being able to temporarily live in an apartment greatly enhances the immersiveness when your travel - you get to feel like a local and experience life in another place. Hotels suck as they cut corners to the point where an article posted here complaining about the lack of bathroom doors in hotels. On the other hand, these rentals drive up real estate prices and drives out locals. And often these rentals are in run-down low-income turning affordable yet poor quality housing into high quality temporary rentals. This drives out low income residents deepening income inequality issues while subjecting them to the threat of homelessness.

    As long as we tolerate a society that only values ROI while ignoring the value of investing in humanity we won't resolve any of these issues. In a better world we would think about others and realize that easy access to shelter is foundational to stabilizing people to enable them to succeed in life. It's not hard, we have an abundance of materials and labor yet we have built a culture where helping others is some form of weakness for both parties.

    • By showsover 2025-12-1816:183 reply

      > On one hand, being able to temporarily live in an apartment greatly enhances the immersiveness when your travel - you get to feel like a local and experience life in another place.

      Yes, if your local life is being inconsiderate and having parties till 3 because you're on holidays. Having an airbnb in your building is terrible as you don't know the people and they don't care about getting to know you.

      > Hotels suck as they cut corners to the point where an article posted here complaining about the lack of bathroom doors in hotels.

      The great thing about hotels is that they can be planned for and zoned correctly for. Even so, I've had a hotel go up 100m from my apartment and had to invest in blackout blinds since they chose for a modern design with glass all over (and the lights are bright at night).

      The biggest problem here in Barcelona is that most airbnbs / short term rentals are companies buying housing as an investment and so are stealing the opportunity from actual people and families trying to live.

      • By subpixel 2025-12-1817:072 reply

        > The biggest problem here in Barcelona is that most airbnbs / short term rentals are companies buying housing as an investment and so are stealing the opportunity from actual people and families trying to live.

        This problem exists regardless of who does the buying. Where I live the locals got into the market first. Still, it's a zero-sum game, every short-term rental is a house a family cannot live in and probably cannot afford to buy.

        On my street 30% of the houses are short-term rentals. Some rent out for $10k/week just 8 weeks a year and are closed up the rest of the time. My daughter is currently the only kid on the street, which has over 100 houses.

        Not only are all the houses now priced as income-producing investments, they are killing the community that used to exist here.

        • By showsover 2025-12-1912:30

          Banning corporate ownership of housing wouldn't solve all problems but it would be a good start. Locals in general are not able to buy up as much of the housing, but it would still be something to look at.

          If I were a dictator I'd say taxes increase by 100% for every house after the first (or second), aiming for a nice balance between allowing people to have another home and limiting the crazyness of owning multiple homes.

        • By taproottap 2025-12-1819:55

          It is maybe a bit cannibalistic to NIMBY politics though.. I have to wonder if we won't actually get the massive housing development we need as owners consolidate and have fewer votes and little social or political clout. Hotels and smaller community landlords had their arguments to sway many around them.

      • By dzhiurgis 2025-12-1819:331 reply

        [flagged]

        • By ryan_lane 2025-12-191:191 reply

          > What does this mean or are you just communist coding your speech?

          What they were saying is simply common sense. If an airbnb host is buying a local unit and renting it out for high prices to tourists, they're going to buy it for a higher price than someone who's simply there to live, and that's stealing the opportunity for someone to live somewhere within their means.

          You don't need to be a communist to understand that it's bad for everyone to prioritize entertainment travel over the ability to afford housing in the city that you live.

          • By dzhiurgis 2025-12-197:43

            But that then applies to any transaction where someone pays higher price. Gentrification? Subdivision? Commercial development? Rezoning? Auction? There's always a chance someone could've lived there for less.

            I'd argue Airbnb owner is going to pay far more in taxes than resident.

      • By thayne 2025-12-1816:323 reply

        > if your local life is being inconsiderate and having parties till 3 because you're on holidays

        I would expect that to be the minority of visitors.

        I certainly don't do that when I stay in Airbnbs.

        > The biggest problem here in Barcelona is that most airbnbs / short term rentals are companies buying housing as an investment and so are stealing the opportunity from actual people and families trying to live.

        Sure, the problem is balancing that with the desire of tourists that want something better than a hotel.

        • By toomuchtodo 2025-12-1816:49

          Tourists don't vote, residents do, and even if short term rentals were outlawed, Barcelona and Madrid would remain tourist hotspots (as they were before short term rentals).

          Certainly, there is a tug of war between tourist dollars vs negative tourist impact, but this math is a function of how impactful tourist decline (if any) would occur by pushing out short term rentals. Hotels always remain an option. Real estate and politics are local, as the sayings go. AirBnB pushed negative externalities on local jurisdictions to achieve their valuation and economic success ("socialize the losses, privatize the gains"), and these efforts are just pushing them back in some form. Tourists should remember that they are guests in the places that host them, and it is a privilege to be hosted.

        • By lm28469 2025-12-1821:06

          > I would expect that to be the minority of visitors.

          If you live next to one the "minority" is at least once a week, usually on a workday because they're in vacation while you're not.

          You get extra trash everywhere, puke in the staircase, empty bottles in front of the building, condoms thrown out of windows, &c. it's a never ending nightmare

        • By tclancy 2025-12-1816:54

          >I would expect that to be the minority of visitors.

          If you share a wall or ceiling or are next door to one, how small would the minority have to be to keep you from being annoyed?

    • By embedding-shape 2025-12-1816:37

      > As long as we tolerate a society that only values ROI while ignoring the value of investing in humanity we won't resolve any of these issues.

      That's exactly what we're not tolerating here in Spain. We have guaranteed right to "decent and adequate housing" enshrined in the constitution, which is why you're seeing these aggressive moves against companies that actively work against us having that.

      I guess we in Spain are a bit of guinea pigs regarding this, as we've been hit hard by Airbnb et al, but we also have strong social movements trying to fight back, and right now being a bit successful. Gonna be interesting to see how it looks like in 5-10 years again, once we start to see the effect of the new laws passed these last few years.

    • By lm28469 2025-12-1821:03

      > you get to feel like a local and experience life in another place.

      Like a local with your fellow thousands of other tourists doing the same things, going to the same places, taking the same pictures? Traveling became the most abject consumeristic activity, there is nothing "local" left in these holiday hubs

    • By nradov 2025-12-1821:022 reply

      The weird thing is that in many cities there is a persistent and ongoing market failure where legitimate hotels in tourist areas often don't offer accommodations suitable for families with multiple children. There are often no hotel rooms with 3+ beds and kitchenette: it's not that they're more expensive, they simply don't exist at any price. So despite the social problems that Airbnb causes they do address a real market demand. Why aren't the hotel chains doing more to compete? What am I missing here?

      • By ryan_lane 2025-12-191:271 reply

        > There are often no hotel rooms with 3+ beds and kitchenette

        There are very few hotels with kitchenettes. Most people don't cook (and don't want to cook) on vacation. Most hotels also don't cater to the low-income, and folks who cook on travel tend to be low-income. There's business rentals that offer this, but they're often not bookable for short-terms (usually 2+ weeks minimum).

        Most hotels can accommodate 5+ people in a room, if you call them. Though no rooms (except suites) will have more than 2 beds, hotels will provide cots. In general, though, rooms aren't expected to host any more than that, and if you have more people than that, the expectation is that you'd book more than one room. Plenty of hotels have adjoining rooms for this purpose.

        Again, though, hotels aren't really targeting low-income folks. Airbnbs can be cheaper in this regard, but most rentals on Airbnb charge by the person, so in some cases can be as expensive or more expensive than getting 2 rooms.

        In either case, I think the issue is your needs are uncommon for vacation travel.

        • By nradov 2025-12-192:591 reply

          It's not about low-income people. Those needs are actually quite common among upper-middle class American vacation travelers with children so I assume you don't know many of them. Regardless of expense it's a huge hassle to drag multiple small children to a restaurant for three meals per day for a week. For at least some meals it ends up just being a lot easier to heat up something in the hotel room.

          I am well aware that hotels will provide cots. Cots are torture. No one wants to sleep on a hotel cot. And even if hotels have adjoining rooms they often won't guarantee to give them to you when you make a reservation. It makes no sense at all.

          • By ryan_lane 2025-12-196:31

            Two adults with two children is doable with 2 beds. That's higher than the average number of children for a family in the US at this point. I know plenty of people with children (and I have children myself).

            Airbnb probably serves you quite well, but you're a bit of a niche market for the travel industry, so it makes sense why your need isn't generally addressed. Hotels have to maximize their space, and the vast majority of people don't need kitchenettes.

      • By tpm 2025-12-1911:42

        Can you name such a city? Even though I'm looking for a queen-bed hotel room I also always get suggested apartment style rooms in hotels (booking.com and similar) that would seem to be suitable in your case, both in Europe and in Asia. Actually in Asia it's more common to have some sort of basic kitchen corner even in small rooms than here in Europe.

    • By HDThoreaun 2025-12-1816:301 reply

      Spains problem is that their economy is terrible. Tourism is almost 15% of barcelona's economy so the tourism sector has political power but all the people who dont benefit from it are pissed. They cant afford to piss off the tourists but tourism has a lot of negative externalities.

    • By danielscrubs 2025-12-198:34

      This burden is on politicians. If you can extract enough value from tourism you both lessen the tourism and get people more happy about tourists.

      The monetary value has to match the damage it does to have people caring less about the “environment” they are in (gossip puts pressure on people to behave, just like renting puts less pressure on people to take care of their apartment).

    • By QGQBGdeZREunxLe 2025-12-1822:031 reply

      I’ve always thought a solution would be to allow Airbnb but cap the amount you can earn per property to the equivalent of an average annual rent.

      This wouldn’t outright ban short-term rentals, but it would reduce the largest financial incentive.

      I say this selfishly, as someone who wants to use the platform while still occupying my own place. Something that offering it as a full-time rental doesn’t allow.

      • By 6510 2025-12-1912:02

        The most obvious solution is never going to happen. Just have a tax and pay the natives for being a tourist attraction.

    • By givemeethekeys 2025-12-1817:194 reply

      If there is such a burnout, then why doesn’t the government just stop letting so many people in? This feels more like a scapegoat situation.

      • By lm28469 2025-12-1821:08

        The people profiting from the situation aren't the people dealing with the side effects, it really isn't that hard to understand... if you own a club or a building it's a gold mine. If you're just an average citizen everything is now more expensive, it's harder to find a place, you have to deal with rude people every fucking day, &c.

      • By QGQBGdeZREunxLe 2025-12-1821:591 reply

        Since Spain is in Schengen they won't be able to easily block tourists getting visas. Plus the visa waiver programs are usually reciprocal.

        Best way to reduce tourism is to levy taxes on tourist activities.

        • By givemeethekeys 2025-12-191:471 reply

          That's a good point. I believe Jordan charges foreigners a much higher rate for to see tourist attractions. But, visitors don't usually stay in Jordan for more than a couple of weeks.

          I think if a country let's someone in only for them to find out that they're not welcome there - they're probably not going back again. It's better to know that a place is very expensive to visit up front, or - like Bhutan - there are very few tourist permits given out.

          • By QGQBGdeZREunxLe 2025-12-1921:44

            Thailand too. Though you can't charge EU citizens more in Spain. It would be against EU law.

      • By tverbeure 2025-12-1817:471 reply

        “just” is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.

        • By givemeethekeys 2025-12-1818:012 reply

          Tourists don’t travel illegally. What am I missing?

          • By tverbeure 2025-12-1818:17

            You’re reducing a very complex problem to a meaningless slogan.

          • By hackable_sand 2025-12-1823:091 reply

            > travel illegally

            What does this even mean? It's not illegal to travel

      • By izacus 2025-12-1819:002 reply

        Whenever you use the phrase "why don't you just", you're almost certainly about to say something utterly dumb and poorly thought out.

        Stop and think a bit more instead.

        • By s1mplicissimus 2025-12-1911:47

          Would be interesting to read your opinion on what you think they missed

        • By givemeethekeys 2025-12-191:39

          Fine, read it without the "just" if it makes you happy.

    • By thefz 2025-12-1910:26

      > As long as we tolerate a society that only values ROI while ignoring the value of investing in humanity

      Wow, it looks like unbridled capitalism isn't the answer after all.

  • By IG_Semmelweiss 2025-12-1815:394 reply

    I distincly recall many articles stating that for ridiculous EUR like 50k you could buy housing in spain right after 2007 the crisis, for many years afterward. Because it was so overbuilt , at least outside of the big metros) that the builders and sellers were desperate to move.

    I wonder if they all wiped out by the crisis (subprime really hit spain hard), and what we are seeing now is the consequence of that wipeout, and bankruptcies.

    • By embedding-shape 2025-12-1815:542 reply

      In large parts of Spain, that is still true. Entire rural villages for sale in some cases even.

      Problem is that it's in areas where people don't want to live. In the areas people want to live, the problem is the opposite, there isn't nearly enough housing, so you end up with some of the highest population densities in EU (#2 and #3 are both in Spain at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_European_Union_cities_... in "density per km2" for example, 50% of top 10 on that list is in Spain!) and prices keep going up.

      Add in that salaries are pretty low so cost of living is subsequently low, so you end up with a ton of "expats" and other fun folks like "foreign investors" who purchase up all the livable/rentable properties with their "higher value" money, because everything is so cheap for them.

      Owners realize this, and while the government is (now at least) trying to put a stop to all of this with limiting rent increases and more, owners still try to take advantage of it as much as they can.

      Personally, I think we need to temporarily put a complete halt to non-residents buying any sort of properties or even land here, at least for a short period of time so the people who actually live and work here can recover from the situation.

      For the average person with a normal job here and not working for foreign companies with a higher salary, it's short of impossible to be able to afford to eventually buy a house.

      • By lithocarpus 2025-12-1816:11

        More fundamentally, the trend of the world economy is toward turning everything anywhere in the world into either a resource to be exploited or a playground for the rich.

        This is a big generalization but I think it's broadly true.

        If you are in a "resource" area you'll get pollution and often instability and war.

        If you are in a "playground" area you get massive cost increases and are eventually forced out.

        As the trend is toward concentrating more and more wealth at the top, the slice of rich who can afford to enjoy the playgrounds becomes smaller and the number of refugees, homeless, and poor becomes larger and poorer.

      • By bonzini 2025-12-1816:151 reply

        > (#2 and #3 are both in Spain at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_European_Union_cities_... in "density per km2" for example, 50% of top 10 on that list is in Spain!)

        That list does not make much sense, because it mostly consists of small municipalities that have been engulfed by growing metropolitan areas. Four of the five Spanish entries are like that, three in Valencia and one in Barcelona; and most other entries in the top 20 are suburbs of Paris, Athens or Naples.

        • By embedding-shape 2025-12-1816:271 reply

          It's a list of cities proper, not just "cities".

          > A city proper is the geographical area contained within city limits

          I'm not sure about the others, but the one from Barcelona is a city actually, with their own local government and all, separate from Barcelona, exactly like Badalona on the other end of Barcelona. It is within the city-limits of Barcelona (region, not city) though.

          • By bonzini 2025-12-1817:28

            It is, but my point is that these entries are more historical oddities than a sign of particularly high population density of Spanish cities. There are similarly dense suburbs in most cities/countries, they just happen not to have a local government.

    • By tedggh 2025-12-1816:211 reply

      I got myself a pretty little condo in Asturias for a steal, at least compared to US prices. I tried first just outside Madrid but it’s crazy expensive there, I saw a small and modern condo and they wanted more of what I paid for a brand new large home in the US very close to a big city, massive in size by European standards. If you want a modern tiny condo in Madrid city center you are looking at over a million euros for sure. Almost NYC prices. But Asturias is so freaking beautiful, and people are sooo laid back and kind, the best! There’s also a train that takes just over 3 hours to Madrid.

    • By tokai 2025-12-1815:53

      You can get houses even cheaper now. The two things are not related though. Huge areas of Spain are barren empty places, with no jobs, transport, or anything. Nobody really can or want to live these places. Thats why the houses are so cheap.

    • By toomuchtodo 2025-12-1815:59

      Major population center rent trends will tell this story (STRs crowding out long term rentals), look at rent pricing in Barcelona for example.

      (own property in Spain)

HackerNews