California is free of drought for the first time in 25 years

2026-01-2022:39459261www.latimes.com

After experiencing one of the wettest holiday seasons on record, still soggy California hit a major milestone this week — having zero areas of abnormal dryness for the first time in 25 years.

After experiencing one of the wettest holiday seasons on record, still soggy California hit a major milestone this week — having zero areas of abnormal dryness for the first time in 25 years.

The data, collected by the U.S. Drought Monitor, is a welcome nugget of news for Golden State residents, who in the last 15 years alone have lived through two of the worst droughts on record, the worst wildfire seasons on record and the most destructive wildfires ever.

Right now, the wildfire risk across California is “about as close to zero as it ever gets,” and there is likely no need to worry about the state’s water supply for the rest of the year, said UC climate scientist Daniel Swain. Currently, 14 of the state’s 17 major water supply reservoirs are at 70% or more capacity, according to the California Department of Water Resources.

California’s last drought lasted more than 1,300 days, from February 2020 to October 2023, at which point just 0.7% of the state remained abnormally dry, thanks to a series of winter atmospheric rivers that showered the Golden State with rain.

Before that, California was in a severe drought from 2012 through 2016.

But the last time 0% of the California map had any level of abnormally dry or drought conditions was all the way back in December 2000. In recent weeks, a series of powerful winter storms and atmospheric rivers have swept across California, dumping heavy rain that soaked soils, filled reservoirs and left much of the state unusually wet for this time of year.

“This is certainly a less destructive weather winter than last year was and than many of the drought years were, so it’s OK to take that breather and to acknowledge that, right now, things are doing OK,” Swain said. He noted, however, that “as we move forward, we do expect to be dealing with increasingly extreme [weather] swings.”

Though it may seem counterintuitive, climate change is forecast to lead to both more intense droughts and more intense episodes of rainfall. This is because a warmer atmosphere pulls more moisture out of soils and plants, deepening droughts. At the same time, a warmer atmosphere holds more water vapor, which is then released in fewer, more extreme rainstorms.

Scientists have coined a name for this phenomenon — the atmospheric sponge effect — which Swain said is “hopefully an evocative visual analogy that describes why as the climate warms we actually are likely to see wider swings between extremely wet conditions and extremely dry conditions.”

A key example of this effect is the weather pattern in the run-up to the devastating Palisades and Eaton fires last year.

In 2022 and 2023, California experienced extremely wet winters. Mammoth Mountain, for example, set an all-time record for snowfall in the 2022-23 season.

But then Southern California experienced one of the driest periods on record in the fall and winter of 2024, which enabled the subsequent devastation of January 2025’s firestorm.

“We didn’t even have to be in a notable multiyear drought to have that sequence of really wet to really dry conditions lead us to a place where the fire risk was catastrophic,”Swain said.

Recent storms have brought snow to the Sierra Nevada mountains, but the state’s snowpack remains below average. According to the Department of Water Resources, the snowpack now stands at 89% of average for this time of year.

Much of the West has seen warmer-than-average temperatures and relatively little snow so far this winter. The snow in the Rocky Mountains remains far below average, adding to the strains on the overtapped Colorado River, a major water source for Southern California.

Research published in the aftermath of the fire examines how this extremely wet to extremely dry weather sequence is especially dangerous for wildfires in Southern California because heavy rainfall leads to high growth of grass and brush, which then becomes abundant fuel during periods of extreme dryness.

Fortunately, California should be clear of water supply risks and wildfire danger for several months to come, Swain said, but in the long term, residents should expect to see more of this weather whiplash.

Times staff writer Ian James contributed to this report.


Read the original article

Comments

  • By offsign 2026-01-211:194 reply

    Makes for a catchy headline, but you only have to go back to Jan 9, 2024* to find a similarly 'drought free' California:

    https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/Maps/CompareTwoWeeks.aspx

    (*Technically slivers of the state in the far north/south were 'abnormally dry' in 2024, a small difference from 2026)

    • By zamadatix 2026-01-213:42

      For a quicker way to find near-alls you can go to https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/DmData/DataTables.aspx?state,... and select "All" at the bottom then sort D0-D4 ascending. It looks like 2011 had many dates 0.01 cumulative percent area!

    • By RataNova 2026-01-2111:47

      The difference between 0% and almost 0% is mostly a cartographic one

    • By PunchyHamster 2026-01-2112:23

      my reaction is pretty much "well, it's middle of winter"

    • By jama211 2026-01-214:284 reply

      Wait so who is being dishonest, the old article, the new one, or both?

      • By lern_too_spel 2026-01-2115:23

        I only found one article. GP linked to the data that the article is based on, showing a day when California was almost drought-free but still had abnormally dry areas.

      • By direwolf20 2026-01-2110:00

        Both!

      • By LegitShady 2026-01-214:52

        yes!

      • By nandomrumber 2026-01-216:102 reply

        There’s ample dishonesty to go round, no one has to miss out if they don’t want to.

        Arguably, there are an infinite number of things that are dishonest, and only a finite number of things that can be honest at any given moment.

        Therefore one can honestly say that there are effectively zero honest things, and the entirety of human thought and speech, the noosphere as it where, is the singular dishonesty.

        The dishonest-gularity.

        • By jama211 2026-01-2117:58

          I didn’t find this particularly helpful if I’m honest

        • By saghm 2026-01-217:35

          I'm not sure that "effectively zero" is quite right; "approximately zero" seems more correct. And on that note, there are also approximately zero instances in the history of the universe where someone has responded to your comment, but hey look, I'm doing it now!

  • By ifwinterco 2026-01-2111:466 reply

    This might be a stupid question, but if "drought" means "abnormally dry" yet an area is in "drought" 90% of the time, does that not just mean the definition of drought is wrong?

    It would be more accurate to say that dry periods in california are just "normal weather" and the occasional wet periods are the abnormal weather.

    I enjoy the rare periods when it's sunny in the UK, but I wouldn't refer to a typical cloudy period as a "sun drought" because the sun is what's abnormal

    • By lithocarpus 2026-01-2118:36

      If you have a fertile abundant landscape covered in old growth forests and marshes, and then cut all the forests, put roads everywhere, and plough up the marshes for farming, the landscape then holds a lot less water and the weather becomes less stable, which can exacerbate natural fluctuations in rainfall and temperature making droughts more common and more severe.

      This is effectively what happened to large parts of the middle east that were once fertile and lush. It's a trend all over the world really.

      There are many ways humans can work the opposite direction to increase the ability of the land to stabilize the weather and increase hydrological robustness to mitigate droughts, e.g. regenerative agriculture or projects in asia and africa to green the desert, I don't know enough about them but it's a good idea and I hope it's executed well.

      The idea that California is now "free of drought" is funny, it may be technically correct by the way the word drought is used, but it doesn't mean the underlying factors that contributed to the likelihood and severity of recent decades of drought have improved - it just means we got a lot of precipitation now, but another dry year and we'll be back in drought again.

    • By Jensson 2026-01-2112:372 reply

      Drought doesn't mean "abnormally dry" though, it means lack of rain resulting in water shortage. And California has had a lot of water shortages.

      • By jfindley 2026-01-2113:401 reply

        It's not quite as simple as that though - in most places, especially California, water shortages are not a simple natural imbalance between the amount of rain that falls and how much flows out in rivers and streams.

        If demand is far higher than supply due to overuse by industry that's definitely a water shortage - there isn't enough of it, and something is probably suffering as a result. I don't think that's a useful definition of drought though. If someone builds a massive factory consuming 100s of millions of gallons of water per day that's definitely going to cause a problem but I'm not sure it's reasonable to say that there's suddenly a drought.

        I think the definition of drought is instead current rainfall compared to historical average - which then leads to the question of if the change is just that rainfall has now been low for so long the historical average has changed, or if rainfall has actually improved. I don't think the article addressed this, but I only skimmed it so maybe I missed it.

        • By DANmode 2026-01-2114:141 reply

          > If someone builds a massive factory consuming 100s of millions of gallons of water per day that's definitely going to cause a problem

          Lots of factories in Washington, seemingly no problem.

          • By butvacuum 2026-01-227:491 reply

            Are you implying 800 miles worth of latitude, along with North Pacific weather in general, is irrelevant?

            • By DANmode 2026-01-2218:32

              It’s very relevant,

              and the next 200 years of settlers should probably take note,

              instead of just continuing to barrel into a place that was unreasonable to live in when it started, and hasn’t changed much in that regard.

      • By FrustratedMonky 2026-01-2112:512 reply

        I think what he is getting at is : deserts are already dry, what makes a drought in the desert?

        It isn't just, a lot of people moved to the desert, so now there is a drought because there isn't enough water.

        I don't have reference, but I think there is some definition around change from average.

        Drought it something like X months with Y% less precipitation than last 5 year average. or some such calculation.

        • By lithocarpus 2026-01-2118:341 reply

          If you have a fertile abundant landscape covered in old growth forests and marshes, and then cut all the forests, put roads everywhere, and plough up the marshes for farming, the landscape then holds a lot less water and the weather becomes less stable, which can exacerbate natural fluctuations in rainfall and temperature making droughts more common and more severe.

          This is effectively what happened to large parts of the middle east that were once fertile and lush. It's a trend all over the world really.

          There are many ways humans can work the opposite direction to increase the ability of the land to stabilize the weather and increase hydrological robustness to mitigate droughts, e.g. regenerative agriculture or projects in asia and africa to green the desert, I don't know enough about them but it's a good idea and I hope it's executed well.

          • By FrustratedMonky 2026-01-2119:22

            All I'm saying is that people or no people, wet or dry, there is an actual calculation and a drought scale. The conversation seems to be wanting to place 'blame', but you can have droughts anywhere, under a lot of conditions (like people moved in) for lots of reasons.

            I looked it up

            Calculating drought involves comparing current conditions (precipitation, temperature, soil moisture, water levels) to historical norms using standardized indices like the Palmer Drought Index (PDSI) or the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), which measure water supply/demand imbalances over short or long periods to assign severity levels (e.g., D0 Abnormally Dry to D4 Exceptional Drought).

            A common method uses indices that turn negative as drought intensifies, with thresholds indicating different drought stages, often combined with expert analysis for the official U.S. Drought Monitor.

            Common Drought Indices

            Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI):

            Uses precipitation, temperature, and soil moisture. Calculates water supply and demand. Values: Below -0.5 indicates drought; below -2.0 is moderate.

            Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI):

            Focuses on precipitation deficits at various timescales (e.g., 1, 3, 6 months). Classifies drought: e.g., -1.0 to -1.49 is Moderate, -2.0 or less is Extreme.

        • By ifwinterco 2026-01-2115:02

          Yes exactly, saudi arabia doesn't have an ideal amount of rainfall for providing water to people and growing crops, but nobody say it's in a "drought".

          It would be nice if it rained more in california, but we can't base definitions on what we'd ideally like to happen

    • By PunchyHamster 2026-01-2112:22

      at least looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droughts_in_California I'd agree with that assessment.

      Would help if the water heavy industries moved to areas with actual water to spare but that ain't gonna happen when the cost of water management is mostly dumped on tax payers and not companies using it

    • By telesilla 2026-01-2119:36

      .. loosely inspired by the California water wars—early 20th-century conflicts over water rights that enabled Los Angeles to access resources from the Owens Valley.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinatown_(1974_film)

      .. By 1926, Owens Lake was completely dry due to water diversion

HackerNews