Comments
By davidee 2026-02-1916:50 The whole article reads like a puff piece for Zuckerberg/meta.
They had him on the stand and these were the most interesting questions and answers? I feel like the WSJ is trying to convince me facebook is a good company trying its best and Zuckerberg is a reasonable empathetic person.
By reactordev 2026-02-1918:061 reply That’s exactly the lens they were hoping for
I guess so, I expected a little more nuance to hide it better. but it was just blatant. like any child could figure it out
Plenty of adults don't catch it either. You don't need to be blatant. Dress it up in neutral business language, keep the arguments one step removed from the conclusion, and anchor it in assumptions people already hold about markets and American institutions. Then it's nearly impossible to push back on without sounding like you're attacking the premises.
By reactordev 2026-02-1921:29 The journalistic version of the “I’m kidnapped” hand signal.
By rand846633 2026-02-209:581 reply Plz enlighten me about the payment. As in meta bought advertisement in wsj?
By lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2026-02-2015:21
By dlev_pika 2026-02-1919:28 That’s what the WSJ is there for
By anjel 2026-02-201:13 You were expecting it to be fair and balanced? What's speaks volumes on murdoch is the WSJ will criticize trump in ways that are heresy on foxnews.
By ai4prezident 2026-02-1918:46 Wsj is always pro-corporate
By 1vuio0pswjnm7 2026-02-1921:30 Alternative source:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/mark-zuckerberg-gr...
Text-only, no Javascript, HTTPS optional:
https://assets.msn.com/content/view/v2/Detail/en-in/AA1WBSLI...
Simple HTML:
{ x=AA1WBSLI ipv4=23.11.201.94 echo "<meta charset=utf-8>"; (printf 'GET /content/view/v2/Detail/en-in/'$x'/ HTTP/1.0\r\n' printf 'Host: assets.msn.com\r\n\r\n') \ |nc -vvn $ipv4 80 |grep -o "<p>.*</p>"|tr -d '\134' } > 1.htm firefox ./1.htm
