Drivers reeling after passengers caught out by AI-powered safety cameras

2026-02-272:011514www.abc.net.au

WA drivers given large fines or a licence suspension after their passengers were snapped wearing seatbelts incorrectly say they are being punished for behaviour beyond their control.


Read the original article

Comments

  • By gnabgib 2026-02-272:371 reply

    Western Australia drivers reeling after passengers caught out by AI cameras

    Don't know why OP dropped an important regional distinction.. not a problem in Honduras, for example. Or Washington state

    • By ahonhn 2026-02-274:431 reply

      A HN audience is so sure to parse "WA" as Washington state that leaving it in the title would be misleading with every second response along the lines of "I only clicked because I thought it was Washington".

      Should it be expanded to "Aussie"? (since "West Australian", "Australian", "Sandgroper", or "Doubleyooalien drivers" doesn't fit the title field).

      I reckon the location is secondary and the interesting part is about technology enabling universal and intrusive enforcement of easy to break rules that were previously difficult to enforce absolutely.

      Such rules tend to have rather draconian 'example making' penalties attached to them because of that.

      Is AI camera enforcement 'not a problem' in Honduras or Washington State because they don't use them there yet? Is seeing how it pans out somewhere else first of no interest to them?

      • By 1123581321 2026-02-277:22

        W.Aus. maybe? As many characters as Aussie. I didn’t have a problem finding out it was WA from the article, though.

  • By ehnto 2026-02-272:383 reply

    I am very torn on this, because something absolutely needs to be done about phone usage while driving as it's just genuinely shocking.

    On the other hand, such pervasive and ever present law enforcement is oppressive. If the majority of your citizens are breaking a law, then your citizenship clearly thinks the law is unnecessary. We give road laws a pass because safety is quite provable through studies and we listen to our researchers, but if we scaled this out to all crimes (like jaywalking) I think you would see just about everyone is a criminal eventually.

    • By yunnpp 2026-02-273:141 reply

      > because something absolutely needs to be done about phone usage while driving as it's just genuinely shocking.

      It's actually very simple. Put a cop by the sidewalk, have them stop people and issue a fine. You'd be making several grand every day. I would do it myself, but I am not authorized to stop people and take their money. There is no need for cameras when the violations are so blatantly obvious and recurring.

      • By ehnto 2026-02-274:45

        They did this for a while, I don't know what the outcome was.

    • By jackvalentine 2026-02-272:541 reply

      > If the majority of your citizens are breaking a law, then your citizenship clearly thinks the law is unnecessary.

      Which law do you think the majority of the citizenship here is breaking?

      • By ehnto 2026-02-274:44

        I'm not thinking of any, we wouldn't know until we had infallible ever present enforcement.

    • By tencentshill 2026-02-2714:352 reply

      In a democracy, that policy would get you removed from office. Don't hassle your own voters.

      • By ehnto 2026-03-015:23

        It is currently developing in Australia, we will probably find out what the limit is if it starts impacting the vote.

      • By jackvalentine 2026-02-284:32

        The people fined for doing the wrong thing are an absolute minority of voters and the majority supports this kind of thing.

  • By ungreased0675 2026-02-272:24

    Australia has an enormous amount of traffic cameras and hand out tickets like I hand out candy on Halloween.

HackerNews