World-first gigabit laser link between aircraft and geostationary satellite

2026-03-0116:4919172www.esa.int

Faster, more secure connections from space could one day make broadband on planes, ships and even remote roads as easy as turning on a light. The European Space Agency (ESA), Airbus Defence and Space,…

Applications

26/02/2026 2168 views 28 likes

ESA / Applications / Connectivity and Secure Communications

Faster, more secure connections from space could one day make broadband on planes, ships and even remote roads as easy as turning on a light. The European Space Agency (ESA), Airbus Defence and Space, the Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO) and German payload manufacturer TESAT (as subcontractor) successfully connected an aircraft to a geostationary satellite using laser communications, bringing people closer to seamless, high‑speed connections in daily life.

During test flights in Nimes, France, Airbus’ UltraAir laser terminal maintained an error‑free connection while transmitting data at 2,6 gigabits per second for several minutes. At such speeds, downloading an HD film takes only seconds.

Laser communications offer a powerful alternative at a time when space is becoming crowded and radio frequencies increasingly scarce. Because laser beams spread far less than radio waves, they provide more secure links and can carry much more information.

Airbus' UltraAir laser terminal seen from the outside of the aircraft
Airbus' UltraAir laser terminal seen from the outside of the aircraft

The UltraAir laser terminal was developed through ESA’s programme for Optical and Quantum Communications – ScyLight – which supports research, development and evolution of optical and quantum communication. ScyLight belongs to ESA’s larger Advanced Research in Telecommunications Systems (ARTES) programme. As part of ScyLight, the project has also been supported by the Netherlands Space Office (NSO) and the German Aerospace Agency (DLR).

“This achievement demonstrates how optical communications can transform secure connectivity for our Member States. Particularly by working to resolve the technical challenges that come with establishing fast laser communications, capable of evading interference and detection in demanding conditions,” said Laurent Jaffart, Director of ESA Resilience, Navigation and Connectivity. “Collaboration drives innovation, and this milestone will strategically deliver benefits to future missions, where speed and security of data transmission is paramount. For Europe and beyond.” 

“This breakthrough proves that our industry strengthens Europe’s security and its autonomy by leading strategic technology in the field of secure laser communications,” said Kees Buijsrogge, Director of Space at TNO.

“Establishing laser links between moving targets at this distance is technically very challenging. Continuous movements, platform vibrations and atmospheric disturbances require extreme precision,” said François Lombard, Head of Connected Intelligence at Airbus Defence and Space. “This milestone is a further development of our long successful laser communication history; it opens the door to a new era of laser satellite communications to meet defence and commercial needs in the next decades.”

“Optical communications between airborne users and satellite networks, like ESA’s High-thRoughput Optical Network (HydRON), are high on ESA’s agenda,” said Harald Hauschildt, Head of ESA’s Optical and Quantum Communication Office. “High-data rate, low-latency links that connect High-Altitude Pseudo Satellites (HAPS) and aircraft are equally demanded for commercial and resilience driven applications.”


Read the original article

Comments

  • By icegreentea2 2026-03-0518:101 reply

    Here's a paper (from July 2025) on previous steps in this program, getting up the initial testing in flight. Maximum uplink laser power of 20W, though they got good performance all the way down to 2W. The sat has a laser pointing down that was used to help lock on, but it's not clear if it has any meaningful downlink capability, all discussions are about uplink capability. Lots a nerdy details here.

    https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of...

    In addition, here's a random paper on the testing performed on the space borne laser terminals - https://icsos2012.nict.go.jp/pdf/1569586689.pdf

    This tells us that the laser terminals have a FOV of +/-2.5mrad in acquisition mode (so before lock on), and +/-0.5mrad in communication/tracking mode. This corresponds ~100km and ~20km radius FOV from GEO to surface.

    • By dogma1138 2026-03-0523:442 reply

      Uplink alone can be significant for clandestine operations.

      You can have a stealth drone which is effectively invisible to SIGINT transmitting real time intelligence to a satellite whilst either operating autonomously or receiving commands via a wide area encrypted broadcast (yes I know you can theoretically detect receivers through signal attenuation but at these distances it’s effectively impossible to do).

      • By fc417fc802 2026-03-062:031 reply

        > yes I know you can theoretically detect receivers through signal attenuation but at these distances it’s effectively impossible to do

        Well if that's part of your threat model then you should also consider the RF put out by the motors. Remember the part where we densely blanked the inhabited parts of the world with highly sensitive antennas over the past 3 decades?

        • By Geof25 2026-03-067:09

          Yeah, spark of engine is something what can be seen on SIGINT for dozens of kilometers.

          So unless jet engine is used (which rarely is on reconnaissance drones) then the drone will be spark lighthouse in the sky.

      • By sleepy_keita 2026-03-068:311 reply

        They say "error-free connection", which implies 2-way communication, right?

        • By dogma1138 2026-03-0723:23

          You can embed parity and error recovery bits in a one way stream.

          This is how one way fiber optic connections for air gapped systems work.

  • By Meneth 2026-03-0512:324 reply

    "low-latency links", says the article. I wonder if they consider 500 ms ping to be low, or if they want to replace Geostationary with Low Earth Orbit.

    • By adev_ 2026-03-0517:562 reply

      > "low-latency links", says the article. I wonder if they consider 500 ms ping to be low, or if they want to replace Geostationary with Low Earth Orbit.

      Directional laser beams are orders of magnitude to jam compared to radio wave. That alone makes it of big interest for military applications, even with 500 ms latency.

      There is several known cases where jamming caused the loss of costly military drones.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93U.S._RQ-170_incid...

      Laser comms could prevent that entirely.

      • By shagie 2026-03-0518:392 reply

        > Directional laser beams are orders of magnitude to jam compared to radio wave. That alone makes it of big interest for military applications, even with 500 ms latency.

        I am reminded of RFC 1217 - Memo from the Consortium for Slow Commotion Research (CSCR) https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1217

            2. Jam-Resistant Land Mobile Communications
        
               This system uses a highly redundant optical communication technique
               to achieve ultra-low, ultra-robust transmission.  The basic unit is
               the M1A1 tank.  Each tank is labelled with the number 0 or 1 painted
               four feet high on the tank turret in yellow, day-glo luminescent
               paint.  Several detection methods are under consideration:

      • By SlightlyLeftPad 2026-03-0519:261 reply

        Could these not be jammed by blasting the same wavelength laser at said geostationary satellite?

        • By tiagod 2026-03-0519:343 reply

          Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I guess if you aim well enough, there could be a very long, narrow, non-reflective cylinder in front of the receiver that would block all light that is not coming exactly from the direction of the target satellite.

          • By scottLobster 2026-03-0521:451 reply

            "If you aim well enough" is doing a ton of work there. Precise real-time optical tracking of a satellite from a moving platform is an extremely difficult problem. Even if the satellite itself is geostationary, it would also have to rotate to keep the "cylinder" pointed in the right direction to maintain signal.

            I suppose you could make a "cylinder" or "cone" broad enough that, if the threat was static, could blot-out attempted jamming from only certain regions while staying open facing toward friendly zones.

            • By cyberax 2026-03-060:121 reply

              It's a geostationary sat. It doesn't move.

              • By scottLobster 2026-03-060:271 reply

                No, but the airplane it would be talking to does. Hard enough when your transceiver is wide open, if you narrow your FOV to a thin cone in order to block jamming signals, the GEO now has to physically track the airplane somehow.

                Either the whole satellite rotates or the transciever is on a mount that can rotate

                • By vlovich123 2026-03-060:481 reply

                  Unless you plan on having 1 satellite per airplane, something tells me it's harder to constrain the FOV than you might suggest. There's also the small problem of the energy, complexity, & weight of having motorized parts on the satellite (or fine-grained attitude control for the satellite itself to track the craft).

                  • By scottLobster 2026-03-061:00

                    Agreed, my point is it's a lot harder than tiagod made it sound.

                    It also doesn't account for some kind of mobile jammer making it inside the cone, particularly if it's staring at an adversarial nation where secure comms would be needed the most, but the adversary would have freedom of movement.

          • By Onavo 2026-03-0519:37

            You will probably need to increase the gain (better lens, photomultipliers) on the receiver photodiode too.

          • By trashb 2026-03-068:48

            your assuming the target satellite doesn't reflect?

    • By fidotron 2026-03-0513:122 reply

      Getting it to work with one end stationary first sounds like a reasonable development plan. LEO adds a lot of complexity, but with huge benefits.

      OTOH the number of engineers that focus on throughput over latency is quite staggering.

      • By IrishTechie 2026-03-0513:182 reply

        I guess if your goal is just to stream aircraft telemetry and black box like recordings then latency may not be high on the agenda.

        • By connicpu 2026-03-0514:38

          Black box data doesn't need that crazy throughput either though. Traditional RF is much easier to get right, and works even when the aircraft starts losing track of where it is and stops being able to track the satellite with its laser

        • By SiempreViernes 2026-03-0513:55

          I think it's the opposite? For small telemetry you want it now, but for the big data products there's no hope of "now" and so you settle for soon.

      • By amarant 2026-03-0522:44

        Leo seems easier to me. Geostationary is really far away. Leo is much, much closer. It's easier to hit a buck thats running right past you than to hit a stationary target across the Atlantic.

        Especially if you yourself are on a moving platform

    • By pottertheotter 2026-03-0515:381 reply

      I’ll take 500ms ping for those speeds while temporarily on a plane.

      • By oofbey 2026-03-0515:571 reply

        No doubt! I’ve measured literal 5 minute ping times on airplanes. 300,000ms. Where are the buffering the packets!?

        • By raddan 2026-03-0517:003 reply

          My guess is that you're getting retransmissions because of dropped frames, not because there's some huge buffer in the sky.

          • By reactordev 2026-03-0517:31

            Indicated airspeed 280kts, ground speed 470kts, FL410, the packets are trying to catch up…

          • By JackFr 2026-03-0517:351 reply

            I like "huge buffer in the sky".

            That's where I imagine all my deleted data goes.

            • By 0_____0 2026-03-0520:49

              we're all just riding the ring buffer of samsara, maaan

          • By BobbyTables2 2026-03-0517:56

            There’s one huge buffer in the sky!

            The huge buffers are at the two endpoints (:->

    • By rtkwe 2026-03-0519:07

      Geostationary is easier to hit than a LEO constellation like Starlink. With an LEO target you need to switch at least every 2-4 minutes, Starlink ground stations can switch multiple times per minute but that's for obstacle avoidance in the air you'd only have to switch when the current target moves out of LOS entirely.

HackerNews