Unlike social networks or auction platforms, the mass departure of users (this isn’t that), would not affect the quality of experience of those remaining. There’s not the same network effects.
So the investors would pound the same amount of money, into a platform with dwelling number of users?
The New American Dream: Start as a non-profit dedicated to humanity, pivot to a for-profit to scale and eventually find your final form as a subsidiary of the military industrial complex.
Where every employee can watch the news to see how many people their efforts are killing.
Apparently 27% of the population of the USA wouldn't have a problem doing exactly that.
No where near as deep as the broader economy. It is likely more profitable to pass on the govt contracts for the foreseeable future
In other words, US tax payers are already paying customers of OpenAI, a few simply won’t be a “double” customer. This isn’t “exactly” fascism, no. It’s something though.
Dwindling, and probably, yes. For a while, anyway.
[dead]
Dwindling number. But maybe? I mean, they're already investing at a level that's completely disconnected from actual results, based on magical thinking and hopium. Just take another hit.
[dead]
This story is such a click bait. A random website makes baseless claims and everyone takes this as face value.
Its scary how often that happens these days. People are incapable of verifying claims due to how many layers deep things go and lazy publications can mistakenly legimatise false claims.
"ChatGPT uninstalls surged by 295% after DoD deal" - https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/02/chatgpt-uninstalls-surged-...
[dead]
I'm also in process of migrating away from OpenAI - I don't like the management, the product has quirks I can't stand, and now the latest PR disaster.