AI Error May Have Contributed to Girl's School Bombing in Iran

2026-03-075:417232thisweekinworcester.com

Pentagon investigators believe a bombing of a girls' school in Iran on Saturday likely resulted from inaccurate information provided by AI.

This Week in Worcester spoke with multiple sources who confirmed that the military’s deployment of AI led to the missile strike against the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls’ school in Minab, a city in southern Iran, on Saturday. Ali Bahreini, Iran’s ambassador to the U.N. in Geneva, said ​the strike killed 150 students. There has been no independent confirmation of that death toll.

The Pentagon is currently investigating the matter, and according to a report from Reuters, officials within the military confirmed the US’s potential responsibility for the attack. There is no evidence at this time that the U.S. military intentionally targeted the school. A compound near the school was previously associated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

This Week in Worcester spoke with a Department of Justice appointee on the condition of anonymity, citing an ongoing and active investigation. “The immediate theory is that the AI program included the school’s position based on older, archived intelligence. The logic behind the launch, and the mechanics of who authorized it is unclear.”

This Week in Worcester spoke with a logistics programmer in the Department of Defense (DOD), who said that the department rapidly scaled up its use of a Claude-based system over the past year, integrating it with many core operational decisions.

“They are gung-ho about this program, and want to use it for everything. Most of their operational planning is done using this software, although there is some things we have designed in-house,” said the appointee.

The incident in Iran is currently under investigation by military investigators.

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to Reuters, “While the Department of War is currently ​investigating this matter, the Iranian regime targets civilians and children, not the United States of America.”

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said in response to being asked about the incident: “We’re investigating that. ​We, of course, never target civilian targets. But we’re taking a look and investigating that.”

Multiple news agencies reported on the military’s use of Claude AI, made by Anthropic.

This week, the Trump Administration declared Anthropic a supply chain risk over the company demanding that the government not use its technology for mass surveillance of Americans or autonomous vehicles. The military has six months to eliminate Claude usage. The administration signed a contract with OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, after the announcement about Claude.

This Week in Worcester previously reported that AI errors led to delays in the release of the Epstein files, with many files being either mistakenly redacted or unredacted without human supervision. The same source there says that some of the files being moved on and off the DOJ’s Epstein website are, “being double-checked by human attorneys.”

Image Credit: Touch Of Light, The Pentagon, Headquarters of the US Department of Defense (cropped2), CC BY-SA 4.0


Read the original article

Comments

  • By zarzavat 2026-03-077:462 reply

    This is not an "AI error". This is a human decision to use known unreliable AI for waging war, in full knowledge that civilian death is an inevitable consequence.

    If you decide your strike locations using a pair of dice, it's not a "dice error" when you blow up a school.

    • By spwa4 2026-03-0711:034 reply

      But this is not an honest argument:

      1) the school was within the security perimeter of an IRGC base

      2) it was in a building that was an IRGC control center 3 years ago

      3) the road to the school is a road internal to that base

      4) the students are from a minority and were forced to go to that school

      5) that base was involved in hostilities when it was hit

      Let's face facts here: the IRGC explicitly created this situation to try to get exactly this mistake, forced those children into the line of fire.

      Btw: that is a war crime. Creating this confusion in the first place is a war crime. On one hand I like that there is a large amount of navel-gazing over this mistake ... but now is not the time.

      AND somehow one side in this conflict just gets to give it's orders command to use shoot-to-kill tactics on children without any peep from anyone: https://www.euronews.com/2026/03/06/iran-security-forces-iss...

      And that leads us to point 6.

      6) the attention this attack is generating is being immediately exploited by the islamic guards to commit more warcrimes against Iranians, to kill children, put more civilians in danger, and even kill patients in hospitals. That, of course, does not seem to justify anyone's attention:

      https://www.iranintl.com/en/202602215486

      https://x.com/NedzzoneXR/status/2030155455431929914

      https://x.com/MTavoli/status/2029881352225452499

      https://x.com/Persianr0yalty/status/2024861128946270244 (this child's death doesn't even have anything to do with this conflict, it's just something the IRGC did on a random Friday)

      7) and the fact that this generates asymmetric attention is being exploited in hostilities by the IRGC as well. They aren't just committing warcrimes in Iran:

      https://x.com/MOHAMMA47949502/status/2030211448006431044

      https://x.com/ayca_mls/status/2030233506450641183

      https://x.com/IsraelinUK/status/2030227972582416493

      In other words: the attention this is generating is directly leading to the killing of Iranian and Israeli civilians. AND THAT IS THE INTENTION BEHIND THIS REPORTING.

      This report is a weapon used to commit more warcrimes. Not a reasonable attempt to hold people responsible. It must stop.

      And, frankly, do you people even know who you're dealing with when it comes to Iran? Google "plastic keys to heaven", for an explanation how Islam means you can use 6-year-old minority children as cheap demining equipment? That other people's children can be kidnapped and used to figure out where the enemy deployed chemical weapons? (Iraq btw, that's how mullahs fought their first war). Use kidnapped children where snipers are located? Another fantastic islamic mullah invention! Seriously, LOOK IT UP.

      The 2 sides just don't compare here. So by all means, investigate the mistake that lead to this attack and try to prevent it. Slowly. Thoroughly. When the situation stabilized. Which means in a month or two. First, give people a chance to end it.

      And yes, this might end in disaster. The situation before this conflict started was a disaster already, just not for you personally.

      • By Tadpole9181 2026-03-0717:25

        Even when it's the US' fault, it's still everyone else's fault. The superpower with an unrivaled spy and surveillance state with a constellation of satellites and precision missiles with blades that can hit an individual person from across the world is just simply helpless from blowing up a school of children.

      • By tastyface 2026-03-0721:18

        "Btw: that is a war crime. Creating this confusion in the first place is a war crime. On one hand I like that there is a large amount of navel-gazing over this mistake ... but now is not the time."

        Are you under the impression that the US does not have schools on their own military bases? Would you consider this a war crime as well? If they get bombed, would you shrug it off as collateral wartime damage?

      • By thunky 2026-03-0721:57

        Right and I'm sure if a family at a US army base commissary or movie theater were to get blown up by Iran tonight you'd accuse the US of a war crime and let Iran off the hook, right?

      • By thefz 2026-03-0716:10

        Yes it's 150 girls' fault to have gone to school near a military target. Man, sober up please.

  • By k310 2026-03-077:58

    Predicted yesterday.

    > Target schools, blame vendor instead of operators.

    > I fully expect this.

    > Based on industry experience, where vendors were hired (and paid well) so that there would be, and I quote, "a throat to choke" when needed.

    This could be the feeler for a full-on buck-passing.

    The first refuge of a scoundrel is to blame someone else. "We didn't kill those kids. Faulty AI did it." A "perfect" setup. Or do you believe in a string of 10 accidental coincidences?

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47271391#47271572

  • By WarOnPrivacy 2026-03-076:032 reply

         "The immediate theory is that the AI program included the
         school’s position based on older, archived intelligence. 
    
         The logic behind the launch, and the mechanics of who
         authorized it is unclear."
    
    Is this a "We don't know what's in the black box" scenario?

    • By muddi900 2026-03-077:132 reply

      It is a way to absolve responsibility

      • By EFreethought 2026-03-077:281 reply

        Companies are spending billions so they can say the dog ate their homework.

        • By muddi900 2026-03-078:52

          The State* is spending billions so it can say the dog pulverized the school children.

      • By moogly 2026-03-077:34

        Easier and cheaper to just say "they were Hamas/Hezbollah".

HackerNews