Suburban school district uses license plate readers to verify student residency

2026-03-1214:41193252www.nbcchicago.com

A mom says a suburban school district is erroneously denying her daughter's enrollment because of data from a license plate reader company.

Just over a year ago, Thalía Sánchez became the proud owner of a home in Alsip. She decided to leave the bustle of the city for a quiet neighborhood setting and the best possible education for her daughter.

However, to this day, despite providing all required paperwork including her driver’s license, utility bills, vehicle registration, and mortgage statement, the Alsip Hazelgreen Oak Lawn School District 126 has repeatedly denied her daughter’s enrollment.

The denials, that are documented through the school district’s online portal and through emails with Sánchez, prompted her to follow up with the school district.

“I contacted the person that's in charge of the students of the enrollment and addresses… she was the one that informed me that my license plates are being tracked,” said Sánchez.

According to the school district, her daughter’s new student enrollment form was denied due to “license plate recognition software showing only Chicago addresses overnight” in July and August. In an email sent to Sánchez in August, the school district told her, “Although you are the owner on record of a house in our district boundaries, your license plate recognition shows that is not the place where you reside.”   

Sánchez is adamant she and her daughter have been steadily living in their home since moving in. As for the location of her car—she says she loaned it to a family member in Chicago last summer. Now it’s back in her driveway.

When it comes to the school district knowing the location of her vehicle, Sánchez wants to know how they have access to license plate reader information. She contacted NBC 5 Responds and Telemundo Chicago Responde to get answers.

Through records requests, we obtained a contract between the Alsip Hazelgreen Oak Lawn School District 126 and Thompson Reuters Clear. According to the company’s website, it’s a “License Plate Recognition (LPR) tool… that links nationwide location information, including surveillance camera data, with vehicle ownership data.”

School District 126’s contract with the license plate reader company shows it’s paying a total of $41,904 for a 36-month-long contract that began in December of 2024 -- the same month that Sánchez and her daughter moved into their new Alsip home.

The plate reader company touts “Accurate residency verification does more than protect the financial health of public schools—it safeguards the trust and equity at the heart of public education.”

The school district’s website states “District 126 uses the CLEAR software program as a component of our residency verification process. Residency verification is completed several times throughout the year.”

NBC 5 Responds and Telemundo Chicago Responde contacted the school district numerous times to get a better understanding of how the plate readers are used in the student enrollment process. Our phone calls and emails requesting an interview have not been returned.

We also contacted Thompson Reuters Clear, but we didn’t hear back.

As for Sanchez, her daughter is currently attending a private school 45 minutes away from her home. She hopes something will change.

“I do not understand. Why am I being denied something so important, which is a child's education," she said. "I am living here, I do pay taxes, I contribute to all those things and I don't have access to that [public school].”


Read the original article

Comments

  • By Aurornis 2026-03-1215:375 reply

    The scariest part of this story isn’t that they’re doing LPR at drop-off, it’s that they’re claiming to have knowledge of where the car is parked overnight.

    > her daughter’s new student enrollment form was denied due to “license plate recognition software showing only Chicago addresses overnight” in July and August. In an email sent to Sánchez in August, the school district told her, “Although you are the owner on record of a house in our district boundaries, your license plate recognition shows that is not the place where you reside.”

    The person in the story claims to have lent the car to some family members at that time. That appears to confirm that the car was really parked somewhere else at night. But how does this LPR company have that information?

    • By runjake 2026-03-1217:442 reply

      It's covered in the article. The school district has a contract with Thompson Reuters Clear. And here's more general information on that service:

      https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/blog/leveraging-license-pla...

      Key bit:

      "With LPR intelligence tools such as Thomson Reuters license plate recognition, corporate crime professionals have the ability to share and request the sharing of commercial LPR data with other corporations."

      Eg. Flock and Vigilant Solutions.

      https://losgatan.com/class-action-suit-against-flock-license...

      https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260227692233/en/Flo...

      • By goatlover 2026-03-1218:003 reply

        Shouldn't be information the school district has a right to access. It's none of their business where a person's car is parked over night. I really hope society pushes back on surveillance.

        • By ikr678 2026-03-130:15

          Chicken and egg - this is a symptom of inequality in the schooling system. The school is trying to defend a particular status quo. If your schools were funded differently (eg not from hyper-local district property taxes, maybe redistributed equally at the state level), parents would feel less pressure to compete for 'better' school positions.

        • By runjake 2026-03-1219:16

          It seems like overreach, to say the least.

        • By Gud 2026-03-137:04

          This is information that SHOULDNT EXIST.

      • By dwaltrip 2026-03-1219:13

        That’s fucking crazy.

    • By dghlsakjg 2026-03-1218:21

      The craziest part of this is that a school district thinks that the overnight location of the vehicle used to transport a student has anything to do with the location of the residence. Especially when that data is from a time period when the school isn't in session.

      I can think of a half dozen valid scenarios why the vehicle used for school drop off is parked away from the student's residence at night.

      e.g. Vehicle belongs to a non-custodial parent from out of district who handles drop off. Vehicle is used by a household member to do overnight shift work. Family just moved, of course their vehicle wasn't being parked in the district in July. ALPR character recognition error. Parent and student live elsewhere in the summer, and still qualify as residents within the district.

      It sometimes boggles the mind the amount of inflexibility that people doing these jobs have/are willing to use, especially in something so consequential.

    • By throwawaytea 2026-03-1215:443 reply

      There are companies that scan every parked car visible in any public accessible spot.

      • By kotaKat 2026-03-1216:121 reply

        Fun fact: Motorola Solutions sells LPRs not only to law enforcement (via Vigilant Solutions), they also sell them via the "Digital Recognition Network" arm to third party companies - tow operators, private operations, and so on.

        Some of the largest customers of DRN are banks, especially sub-prime lenders :)

        https://drndata.com/about/

        https://drndata.com/news/motorola-solutions-acquires-vaas-in...

        And all of them... feed right into the greater LEARN (Law Enforcement Archival Reporting Network) system that the feds and company have access to at all times.

        • By Zigurd 2026-03-1216:27

          This isn't the Motorola that makes phones. Lenovo owns Motorola Mobility. But America kept the highly profitable business of building a surveillance state. Yay.

      • By mmmlinux 2026-03-1215:524 reply

        The real question is why do they only sell information to services designed to cause harm.

        • By throwawaytea 2026-03-1216:321 reply

          Returning a vehicle to a bank that someone has stopped paying for isn't exactly harm. If banks were unable to get vehicles back, people with bad credit would have a much harder time getting a vehicle in the first place.

          • By ProllyInfamous 2026-03-1218:31

            >much harder time getting a vehicle in the first place.

            This is a good thing; add "houses" to the list, too. Credit is too freely issued — we live on debt (as a society/world).

            I've seen people throw their $20k in negative equity into a new purchase/lease — and just been baffled.

            --but I agree: lenders oughta'be able to retrieve their lien'ed properties.

        • By mmmlinux 2026-03-1218:43

          There are A LOT of throwaways talking about repossessing cars in this comment. that's a little weird. Guess I struck a nerve at some company.

        • By idle_zealot 2026-03-1216:086 reply

          Who else would buy it? What use exists for this data that isn't harmful to society?

          • By browsingonly 2026-03-1217:201 reply

            Repossessing cars isn't societally harmful, quite the opposite in fact.

            • By JuniperMesos 2026-03-1221:05

              If it was not possible or even just much harder to repossess a car, lenders would be much less willing to grant loans to people in order to buy a car.

          • By kube-system 2026-03-1216:102 reply

            Finding missing people? Finding criminals?

            • By throwawaytea 2026-03-1216:331 reply

              People not returning vehicles to the banks, or commiting fraud by taking up resources in districts they don't live in are technically criminals.

            • By razingeden 2026-03-1216:23

              “Find me the missing person, and I’ll find the crime.”

              — Lavrentiy Beria (Probably)

          • By throwaway27448 2026-03-1216:36

            Discouraging people from using cars at all?

          • By ProllyInfamous 2026-03-1219:37

            Private Investigators; vindictive ex-lovers; spiteful law enforcement; personal vendettae; abortion tracking...

            ...some combination of all of the above?!

          • By bregma 2026-03-1217:062 reply

            Catching the pedophiles. Think of the children.

            • By mindslight 2026-03-1218:24

              More like catching the children. Think of the pedophiles.

            • By goatlover 2026-03-1218:02

              As long as theyrw not in the Epstein Class.

        • By quickthrowman 2026-03-1217:02

          Repossessing collateral on a secured loan is not a service designed to cause harm.

      • By ProllyInfamous 2026-03-1216:014 reply

        e.g. at BigBox Mart towtrucks will traverse the parking lanes, with ALPR cameras quickly detecting repos to snatch.

        My car is paid for but I just don't display a license plate period (in my US state it's only a $10 fine to not).

        • By xxpor 2026-03-1216:202 reply

          >My car is paid for but I just don't display a license plate period

          Which of course draws a bunch attention to you regardless.

          • By ProllyInfamous 2026-03-1217:451 reply

            It's not about hiding — it's about sending a message.

            IIRC, Steve Jobs was known to do this in his black plateless Mercedes (decades ago).

          • By tbyehl 2026-03-1218:401 reply

            It really doesn't, there are lawful reasons to not have a plate yet.

            • By ProllyInfamous 2026-03-1219:04

              Tennesee also doesn't require antique vehicles to display the license plate (only to have it "available upon demand"). It's only 25 years old to be considered "antique," but you must request this from DMV (i.e. isn't automatic).

        • By AdamN 2026-03-1217:571 reply

          $10?? I thought it was a major crime to drive without a license plate.

          • By ProllyInfamous 2026-03-1218:101 reply

            Welcome to Tennessee (it shouldn't matter, but it does: clean-cut taxpaying middle-aged white guy, with former background in govt data centers [1] ). If I had any detectible minority status, I would display a plate properly.

            More onlookers (from behind) snap photos of this taglessness than any other politics/offensive bumper sticker I've had [2] — my only thought is that my vehicle misleads them to think that perhaps I'm undercover I.C.E. (purposefully obscurring)..?

            [1] I've woken up blackout in a comped hotel when friends in identical situation got arrested/PI; I still carry a long-expired govt work badge in my moneyclip

            [2] 2nd-most popular, all-time, was "Patron Saint of Denials Luigi Mangione" image

            • By dec0dedab0de 2026-03-1218:541 reply

              In New Jersey your parked car could be towed for not having a plate.

              • By ProllyInfamous 2026-03-1219:031 reply

                In Tennessee we don't even issue front plates. Most vehicle registrations are <$30.00 (imagine!).

                Twenty years ago my then-fiance and I were entering NYC via tollbooth, and the attendant harrassed us about "where is your front license plate?!"

                • By dec0dedab0de 2026-03-1219:461 reply

                  That's odd, because Pennsylvania doesn't have front plates either, and it is pretty close to NYC.

                  • By ProllyInfamous 2026-03-1312:08

                    PA's blue/yellow standard plate is soooo ugly they don't need to issue more than one.

        • By project2501a 2026-03-1216:542 reply

          can you put some kind of filter the screws the cameras up?

          • By ProllyInfamous 2026-03-1217:42

            These lens "blockers" are working less-and-less well (as tech gets better if they ever worked well at all), and seem to increase targeting from law enforcement.

            In Tennessee, after the first two citations for "improper display of registration" it becomes an actual crime (an actual misdemeanor); if I ever get to this point (four months now multiple cops behind me haven't given a single F), I have an increasingly-insane series of "protests" that have semi-interesting legalities [0].

            [0] e.g. transfer registration to brother ($10 gift fee every few months, which results in no tag requirement); small 3ft trailer (possibly with guillotine erected atop, blocking view), as TN does not issue license plates to trailers less than 15ft length

            ----

            This isn't about "disappearing" (impossible in any modern civilization) — it's about sending a message and adding one small additional layer of protection from simple broad ALPR searches.

        • By maratc 2026-03-1216:481 reply

          There's an XKCD on licence plates (https://xkcd.com/1105/) which is probably relevant to your case, too.

          • By ProllyInfamous 2026-03-1217:341 reply

            I have a printout of #1105 in my glovebox, specifically because my license plate is similarly-ridiculous (and "unscannable" but a legally-issued specialty plate). On the reverse is a copy of my state's law on "proper display of registration identifier," but not to discuss with a cop (for him to find in event of being an asshole, searching my vehicle).

            My vehicle blends in and is otherwise-legal — non-compliance encourages me to obey most traffic laws — but I do carry the plate in my passenger seat to display in event of pull-over (my plate is some iteration of "no plate," and I do respect individual officers' safeties [1]).

            [1] They have every right to know, when performing a lawful investigation. My plan would be to hold it up while initially stopped (to show intent of identification, my plate is complicated in many ways and must be searched for in a very odd way).

            • By mmmlinux 2026-03-1218:421 reply

              I think its funny you think youve come up with some unscannable license plate.

              • By ProllyInfamous 2026-03-1218:56

                My state does not allow certain confusing characters, but I'm part of an organization which issues plates in specific violation of aforementioned character restrictions (as an added bonus the plate/organization is emblazzened with `EMERGENCY` across the bottom). ALPR camerae mis-read the plate, having applied state interpretation rules — no human outside my organization has ever read it correctly, either [0].

                But of course since you cannot even see it anymore it is definitely unscannable. I can drive by speed camera without issue (i.e. no citations received; not that I regularly do, but have tested).

                [0] Only once have I been pulled over, in the past decade (back when plate displayed normally), after traveling behind a cop for miles going 100mph+ through Dade County mountains. Cop: "I have no clue what agency you're with — you're plate didn't scan — but you need to slow the fuck down. You're lucky I have somewhere else to be!"

    • By HexPhantom 2026-03-1216:191 reply

      The scary part isn't a single camera, it's the aggregation

      • By overfeed 2026-03-1218:011 reply

        I've often thought to spook legislators by crowd-sourcing this and scaling it. Any member if of the public can upload dashcam footage, and can search any number plate captured by the network: including legislators, town councilors and school board members. Access is gated by uploading dashcam and having it corroborated by other footage to avoid faked footage, e.g. cross-checking license plates in the same area.

        My concerns are the decision makers may rake the wrong lesson from this, my own moral injury, and/or legal exposure when this information is inevitably used to harm someone. Also, Law enforcement would happily co-opt this service. Perhaps making the searches themselves public would alleviate same of the challenges.

        • By phil21 2026-03-1220:181 reply

          I've thought about doing this, but ironically you'd be sued into oblivion where I'm from. Likely prosecuted by the both the state and city attorney for violating privacy laws already on the books. Yet somehow Flock is deploying cameras everywhere.

          My system would have been much more open on purpose. Like the private bittorrent tracker of security cams. You stream footage to the centralized cloud for aggregation, and get access to the full dataset in return. Perhaps with some "ratios" built in to incentivize sharing like you do for seeders vs. leechers on the BT network.

          It's a fascinating technical problem - but the legal minefield is crazy even if you're doing it as a form of protest.

          I also think the lessons would be lost on the general public. If anything, it would result in laws that made such things only legal for private licensed companies or some such - I'd simply be assisting in furthering regulatory capture.

          • By overfeed 2026-03-1221:19

            > Likely prosecuted by the both the state and city attorney for violating privacy laws already on the books.

            Recording in places where there is no expectations of privacy is legal, and it would be very useful to establish case law that establishes that scaling up can impugn privacy. I selfishly don't want to be a defendant since I can't afford it, but if I won the lottery jackpot, this is what I'd be working on.

    • By john_strinlai 2026-03-1215:41

      more concerning than overnight, in my opinion, is monitoring it in summer months when school is presumably out and keeping a record of it for who knows how long.

  • By Ccecil 2026-03-1215:067 reply

    Big flag error I can see right away is joint custody where a parent lives out of the zone.

    Every time the parent who doesn't live in the exact neighborhood drops the child off the car is flagged.

    Then what happens when they look into this? Does the child automatically go to the school zoned for the parent with a "better" school or a "cheaper" school? Who makes the decision?

    What about paid caregivers or family members?

    This is a huge waste of time/money for everyone except for the company who sold the school on the "need" for it. There are way better ways of combating fraud which don't introduce mass surveillance.

    • By reactordev 2026-03-1215:211 reply

      This is all around a bad idea. Not only because of the scenario you mentioned but because modern “families” look different today. Zones split right down neighborhoods… even living one block away puts you in another school.

      • By philamonster 2026-03-1215:371 reply

        Right. I am in that bucket described by parent comment but also live literally at the edge of the district boundary our second child will eventually attend that I intentionally took up residence in a few years ago when we split. All kinds of motivation as to why a SD would do this but I don't need that decision influenced by a company that has no presence in the state let alone the district I live.

        • By reactordev 2026-03-1216:022 reply

          In areas where school choice isn’t available, it’s to keep the affluent districts, affluent. It’s racism and bigotry disguised as protecting children.

          • By bobthepanda 2026-03-1216:152 reply

            The inequality of school districts is probably one of the biggest systemic barriers in our society.

            That being said, school choice isn’t that helpful. The most segregated school district in the US is NYC, which has had citywide school choice for a long time.

            > In 2018 in New York, 90% of black students attended predominantly nonwhite schools, while Latino student enrollment in predominantly nonwhite schools has remained roughly stable (84%). Almost two out of three black students and over half of Latino students attend intensely segregated schools, where less than 10% of student enrollment is white.

            • By reactordev 2026-03-1217:20

              Just because they are there statistically doesn’t mean there isn’t an underlying reason.

              Maybe the “best” districts do what was done to me when I was growing up and purposefully test me harder, then get upset when I passed. Trying to justify that I didn’t belong but I ended up scoring a 99.9% on their stupid aptitude tests.

              There’s a whole host of reasons why someone with choice still chooses shitty…

            • By JuniperMesos 2026-03-1221:10

              The white population of NYC is only about 30%. If every school in the city had exactly the same racial demographics as the city as a whole, every single school would be a predominantly nonwhite school.

          • By philamonster 2026-03-1216:34

            Yeah well aware after ~17 years in public/higher ed in multiple states and what crossed my mind first when I read the parent's name in the article though trying not to generalize as I know nothing of the district mentioned.

    • By phil21 2026-03-1215:28

      Where I grew up it was "technically" whichever parent had primary custody, which back then was usually very clear - especially during the school year. So much like taxes are "6 months and a day" for residency, it was similar for school.

      In reality it was basically just "one parent lives in the district with a legal mailing address that works" - and very rarely enforced or even looked into. Especially if a kid was already enrolled and then later had a life event.

      It more competitive/exclusive districts though this gets taken very seriously, with certain parents tattle-telling on others, etc.

    • By nativeit 2026-03-1216:591 reply

      Major paradigm shift: What if, hear me out, the school administrators talked to the students and their parents?

      I’ll pause for everyone’s minds to finish blowing.

      • By john_strinlai 2026-03-1217:04

        which happened in this case!

        and then the school administrators said, paraphrasing, "despite owning a home in the district, fuck you"

    • By nonameiguess 2026-03-1215:471 reply

      This is "falsehoods programmers believe about addresses" on steroids. Six years ago, I couldn't drive due to injuries and gave my car to my dad, who took it to California. I was pretty diligent about making sure the ownership records transferred and he registered it, but I'm imagining the state of Texas using this as a pretense to deny my ability to vote, and California deciding I owe them income taxes.

      • By ghaff 2026-03-1217:451 reply

        State taxes can be a bit of a mess, E&Y (accountants) were enlisted to started looking at expense reports at a long-ago former employer to be sure people were staying within the guidelines. There are "jock" taxes mainly intended for pro athletes and entertainers but they theoretically apply to everyone for even a one night stay in some states. (Shortish stays for "normal" people were ignored but not sure how kosher that actually was.)

        • By kjellsbells 2026-03-1222:281 reply

          you're giving me flashbacks to my time at Microsoft where a one night trip to another state meant hours wrestling with EY's filing system to record the trip and quizzical questions from my accountant about why Microsoft paid $0.23 to South Carolina for my taxes.

          IIRC it really got going in the pandemic when states realized that all these knowledge workers were earning nice money and not paying a cent in taxes to the state they had run to to get away from the virus.

          • By ghaff 2026-03-130:52

            Yeah. This started during the pandemic. And there were some messages from people on internal message boards along the lines of... but... such and such a state has a requirement that taxes be filed for even a day (which, frankly, would have been cheaper for me to pay out of pocket than to pay for my accountant to file an additional state filing). But said employer apparently decided to ignore de minimus travel stuff though I know people who actually spent a lot of time out of state did need to keep track.

            But, also yeah, MA and NH had a bit of a spat over workers at an MA company who lived in NH who just stopped coming in and therefore stopped filing MA taxes.

    • By HexPhantom 2026-03-1216:23

      A kid could legitimately split time between two homes or be dropped off by whichever parent is on duty that morning

    • By themafia 2026-03-1218:101 reply

      > This is a huge waste of time/money

      Right. And when you see someone so dedicated do it there is almost certainly a hidden variable which causes this to occur. I imagine the nature of funding of these schools and the distribution of public monies has a lot to do with it.

      > ways of combating fraud

      Imagine being the richest country in the world and _caring_, honestly, about school location "fraud."

      • By angiolillo 2026-03-1218:581 reply

        The country as a whole may be "rich" in terms of GDP but school districts are funded locally and many towns are struggling or underwater in terms of finances.

        I lived in a working class town with a school district that built up a great reputation, especially for special needs students, due to the hard work of some amazing teachers and local parents. After I left I found out that the district had to scale back many programs dramatically because the number of students, especially special needs students, was growing significantly faster than the overall tax base and got close to bankrupting the town. Most of that was an increase in the ratio of families (esp special needs families) moving to town for the schools, but apparently there were fraud cases as well.

        I have sympathy for the incoming families that sought out the best school they could find for their children, but I also sympathize with the existing families who lost the great programs they helped build because they became too successful.

        A better solution would have been to fund education more equitably at the state level, but that was not a lever that the school district had.

        • By themafia 2026-03-1219:042 reply

          > started growing much faster than the tax base

          So you have two unaddressed problems.

          > A better solution would have been to fund education more equitably at the state level

          Which could only work if the state was "richer" than the local district. So by playing abstract and unnecessary games with money and districting we intentionally prevent schools from accessing the funding which could obviate concerns over this "fraud" issue entirely.

          > but that was not a lever that the school district had at the time.

          The idea of a parent "fraudulently" getting their child an education from a "district" is still just hilarious to me. What is the point of this system? To make parents play games or to educate children?

          • By angiolillo 2026-03-1313:53

            > [funding at the state level] could only work if the state was "richer" than the local district

            It's not whether the state is "richer", it's whether the state has a more stable percentage of student-age children, especially high cost students (e.g. special needs, behavioral issues).

            Let's say the median student costs ~$20k per year and an outlier who needs individualized help due to special needs or behavioral issues costs ~$150k per year. The expectation is that each district is able to amortize these costs across a diverse tax base. But families, especially those with higher-cost students, frequently shop between neighboring districts to get the best schools for their kids, which is completely rational. Even wealthy cities and towns can be bankrupted if they attract a sufficiently high percentage of households with students, especially higher-cost students. (If this is not obvious I'd be happy to provide an example.) Because of this, even when administrators talk about improving their schools, behind closed doors they'll admit that there's a limit to how much more attractive they can afford to make their school than neighboring districts, especially with regard to special needs programs.

            However, because it is less common for families to move across state lines for better schools, states are more insulated from this sort of adverse selection (New Jersey notwithstanding).

            > we intentionally prevent schools from accessing the funding which could obviate concerns over this "fraud" issue entirely.

            Exactly. No family or school administrator wants to play these ridiculous games, but our inequitable funding structure forces them to.

          • By ikr678 2026-03-130:23

            The point of the system is for wealthier areas to have good schools, and not be forced to contribute their property taxes towards poorer minority areas.

    • By Zigurd 2026-03-1216:30

      The American system of school funding strongly encourages pulling up the ladder behind you. Real estate values are influenced by school ratings, too. Hence Karen as-a-service.

  • By rhoopr 2026-03-1214:505 reply

    A surveillance tech company asserting that they know better, based on 'big data'. Shocking.

    The family has proof of residence (which is its own absurdity we won't discuss), and this third party can arbitrarily override that based on a black box argument.

    • By scottlamb 2026-03-1216:001 reply

      > The family has proof of residence (which is its own absurdity we won't discuss), and this third party can arbitrarily override that based on a black box argument.

      Doesn't the family have a very straightforward libel claim against the third party? That the car was parked elsewhere may be true. "Although you are the owner on record of a house in our district boundaries, your license plate recognition shows that is not the place where you reside" is a statement the family can disprove in court (to a civil standard) and demonstrate has financially damaged them ("her daughter is currently attending a private school 45 minutes away from her home"). If that statement came from the third party (rather than the school district misinterpreting the raw data themselves), the family will win. The straightforward financial damages (let alone anything pain / suffering / punitive damages) likely exceed the company's payment from the school district ("a total of $41,904 for a 36-month-long contract"). It wouldn't take many of these claims before the company becomes insolvent, and good riddance.

      I'd also expect them to win a lawsuit against the school district for falsely denying the basic right of education. Perhaps the individual school administrator also for libel. With any luck, a total legal bloodbath that warns any other school districts away from this conduct.

      • By landl0rd 2026-03-1216:562 reply

        That depends if the third party makes the claim of non-residence and how they make it, and if they disclaim warranty and reliance. I can show you a site with some graphs and data of who is parked where and when and how often; I doubt they're directly saying, "This person definitely doesn't live at this residence, so deny her child entry."

        • By scottlamb 2026-03-1217:00

          That distinction is what I was getting at with "if that statement came from the third party (rather than the school district misinterpreting the raw data themselves)".

          If the company just provided the raw data, they may be in better legal shape. But I'd say either they or the school administrator libeled the family. Maybe both. (Of course, I'm not a lawyer.) Even if the company did provide only the raw data, I wonder if libel is somehow implied in its contracted/intended use. And I'm really hoping for the legal bloodbath outcome, because this is unconscionable.

          The family may not have time or money to pursue this, but there are lawyers who work on contingency or even pro bono, including the ACLU.

        • By Retric 2026-03-1217:10

          If they disclaim warranty and reliance that’s relevant to the person they are selling data to, but not to the harmed party.

    • By binsquare 2026-03-1215:101 reply

      Yep, completely absurd but I'd also add that both the tech company and the school gov deserves equal shame here given there's proof of residence.

      I can't imagine why highly paid school admin wouldn't correct an obvious mistake.

      • By echelon_musk 2026-03-1215:212 reply

        > highly paid school admin

        I would not have expected a school administrator to be highly paid. What kind of salary are we talking about here?

        • By hrimfaxi 2026-03-1215:282 reply

          Is 500k highly paid? https://www.illinoispolicy.org/see-what-your-illinois-school...

          It's the teachers that are shafted, not the admin/manager class.

          • By echelon_musk 2026-03-1215:482 reply

            That's mind blowing to me. I'd imagine they out earn a significant percentage of HN posters!

            • By ceejayoz 2026-03-1215:501 reply

              They're CEOs of fairly large organizations, often managing thousands of employees and budgets of hundreds of millions of dollars.

              • By shrubble 2026-03-1216:131 reply

                That’s spending that is all on autopilot; how much time does any CEO spend on payroll? Approximately zero.

                • By ceejayoz 2026-03-1216:36

                  They aren't being paid the big bucks to sign off on a payroll run.

                  They're being paid to manage the parts of the organizations that do that sort of thing, among others.

            • By hrimfaxi 2026-03-1220:54

              And they get pensions!

          • By chaps 2026-03-1215:37

            ....yes, half a million dollars per year is highly paid.

        • By criddell 2026-03-1215:261 reply

          In Texas, the superintendent of the big school districts all make around $400k.

          • By ceejayoz 2026-03-1215:321 reply

            Yeah, but a good portion of that is making sure they keep the football team going.

            • By criddell 2026-03-1215:351 reply

              In the Dolton school district (Chicago suburb), their superintendent makes $530k / year. Is that for the football team?

              • By ceejayoz 2026-03-1215:402 reply

                Having never heard of Dolton before, I certainly can't speak to their specifics. School systems can be pretty huge orgs requiring significant management expertise; no one blinks an eye when a CEO gets pay for similar responsibilities.

                I've heard enough about Texas's high school football culture and the pressures on administrators over it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eagle_Stadium_(Allen,_Texas) for example.

                • By criddell 2026-03-1216:53

                  My kids went to a big football high school in Texas and it wouldn't surprise me if the admins there felt a lot of pressure around football. It generated a lot of money for the district and proceeds funded a lot of the arts programs (especially marching band which was huge).

    • By HexPhantom 2026-03-1216:25

      The irony is that the system might technically be "correct" about where the car was seen overnight, but that still doesn't prove anything about where the family actually lives

    • By lotsofpulp 2026-03-1215:002 reply

      In this case, I would think residence is irrelevant, considering this person is paying property tax that pays for this school and land records can easily prove this.

      • By ceejayoz 2026-03-1215:162 reply

        The thing they're trying to combat is people claiming residency in a better school district. We had a case here where the parents were driving their kid to grandma's so the kid could go to school there instead of in a bad local school.

        • By john_strinlai 2026-03-1215:311 reply

          she owns and pays for a home in the school district. the school knows and admits this.

          if she didnt, i would (sort of) agree. but she does.

          • By ceejayoz 2026-03-1215:32

            Yes. I'm saying there's a legit interest in combatting a real challenge. This is a false positive and a stupid bureaucratic hole of the school's own creation.

        • By StingyJelly 2026-03-1215:241 reply

          So what? Grandma's paying taxes there.

          Real solution is to loosen regulations on private schools and provide equivalent tax return to parents who choose private over public.

          • By ceejayoz 2026-03-1215:291 reply

            > So what? Grandma's paying taxes there.

            But the parents aren't, and grandma's tax contribution may have already gone towards funding the parents. The system's structured with local revenue; letting people change their locality too easily messes with that structure a lot.

            (I pay, for example, about $3k in school taxes annually, but I have two kids in a $21k/year district. If they have kids, I may be still paying for their education, let alone the grandkids.)

            > Real solution is to loosen regulations on private schools and provide equivalent tax return to parents who choose private over public.

            Yeah, privatization always results in better results and zero scammy abuses of the system.

            (One hopes the /s can go unsaid.)

            • By nonameiguess 2026-03-1215:531 reply

              Feels like now we're getting into "falsehoods programmers believe about family." My cousin effectively lived with us when he was a kid and went to school in the district for our house, not his mom's. My niece was raised jointly by my sister and my parents, but my sister's housing situation was so unstable she lived with my parents more often, and went to school in that district as well. What exactly do they even do if a parent has no stable housing at all? Make the kid change schools every month?

              • By ceejayoz 2026-03-1216:44

                > Feels like now we're getting into "falsehoods programmers believe about family."

                Sure, but that's why a level of human intervention with a touch of empathy is required for cases like this one and the unhoused example.

      • By dylan604 2026-03-1215:171 reply

        The way you've written this is a bit misleading. I can own undeveloped property in a school district and pay the property taxes for it, but it's a drop in the bucket compared to someone owning a home in that district. The residency requirement would mean you're paying enough property tax since you've clearly developed the property if you are living there.

        • By lotsofpulp 2026-03-1215:451 reply

          Then the government should advertise an explicit minimum amount of tax paid annually in order to register for the school, or switch property tax to land value tax only.

          • By dylan604 2026-03-1218:151 reply

            The residency requirement is that minimum. It's not a minimum in monetary limits. It's a minimum that you have to actually live there. The fact you are living there means you are paying a higher tax amount than for an undeveloped lot. There's a difference on having a house on a lot vs just some field. You have some skin in the game as they say compared to just owning land while living somewhere else completely.

            • By dec0dedab0de 2026-03-1219:031 reply

              What if you lived in a tent in the field?

              • By dylan604 2026-03-1221:04

                Depending on the ordinances, that might not be allowed

    • By kitsune1 2026-03-1215:26

      [dead]

HackerNews