Amazon Employees Say AI Is Just Increasing Workload

2026-03-1219:5710836gizmodo.com

Silicon Valley promised AI would make work less intense. Employees would beg to differ.

For years, Silicon Valley has sold a utopian future to the world, in which all-powerful AI tools automate entire workflows, both freeing up time for burnt-out workers while maximizing profit for shareholders.

Many companies across the American workforce subscribed to this vision. Artificial intelligence crept into the workplace as business leaders promised four-day workweeks and a true work-life balance in a business world where working overtime has become somewhat of a norm.

Now, workers are saying that’s not necessarily the reality they are facing.

A group of Amazon corporate employees told The Guardian that the company’s internal push for all employees to use “half-baked” AI tools was actually unhelpful and just added to their workload.

The AI tools often make mistakes, which the workers then have to dig through and correct or consult with colleagues to verify results, according to the report. It all just adds up to the time they spend on each task and has been hurting productivity, the employees said.

“I and many of my colleagues don’t feel that it actually makes us that much faster,” one software developer told the Guardian. “But from management, we are certainly getting messaging that we have to go faster, this will make us go faster, and that speed is the number one priority.”

The experience isn’t limited to Amazon employees. A recent survey showed that the vision to save time for workers via AI has proven to be a bit bogus across the economy.

Workforce analytics company ActivTrak analyzed work activity across 163,638 employees in 1,111 organizations over three years, only to find that AI is actually increasing the average workload of employees.

“The data is unambiguous: AI does not reduce workloads,” the researchers wrote in a report.

The AI users reported spending more time on every measured work category after AI adoption, with not a single work category showing any decrease. The number of emails a worker had to send was up 104%, chat and messaging was up 145%, and time spent with business management tools was up 94%.

“AI is being used as an additional productivity layer, not a substitute for existing work,” the report says.

The ActivTrak survey paints a slightly different picture from the Amazon report. While Amazon employees reported that the AI tools did not decrease the time they spent doing a task, the survey did find that AI helped speed up some tasks and free up time. But the outcome was still the same: that “free time” was just filled up with even more work. The AI tools ultimately helped the company in its quest for more output, but didn’t help the employee who is looking to ease her work burden.

In a podcast last year, former Google executive Mo Gawdat spoke about this exact disconnect between the promised consequences and the reality of artificial intelligence and technological advancements overall.

“How often did social media connect us, and how often did it make us more lonely? How often did mobile phones make us work less? That was the promise, the early ads of Nokia, where people had parties, is that your experience of mobile phones?” Gawdat said.

The reason why, according to Gawdat, is that technology magnifies existing human abilities and values, and in this case, it’s capitalism’s relentless pursuit of profit.


Read the original article

Comments

  • By wolvoleo 2026-03-1223:352 reply

    Not seeing this yet but our place is still trying to figure things out. We have strong KPIs on how much we use copilot so I must say woof woof to it every day or so to make sure it shows me as an active user (luckily it only shows the latest date someone has used it in each application).

    For programming I find it pretty useful. For MS Office it's so far not a hell of a lot more useful than clippy. The one thing it's good at is finding old stuff in SharePoint and Outlook but that's more a sign of how terrible the search functions are in those than of how good copilot is.

    • By jamesfinlayson 2026-03-1223:532 reply

      A friend of a friend has too - they just ask the AI some random questions in the morning to hit their KPIs because AI doesn't make for a good accountant.

      • By wolvoleo 2026-03-130:45

        I literally say woof woof hehe. I have to be careful sharing my screen because the sidebar (conversation history) is full of "morning puppy greetings!!" and stuff.

        I can see the reports being generated myself (I work in that part) so I know what I'm doing looks good enough.

        But it would be funny if I really had to give it busywork. I'd probably build a local agent (like with foundry or something) to talk to copilot keeping it busy. I like the paradox of that.

      • By dyauspitr 2026-03-130:383 reply

        That’s far from the truth. LLMs are excellent accountants, especially for net zero balance stuff which is how most companies run.

        • By FuckButtons 2026-03-138:35

          I know accountants, most of the stuff they deal with is getting stuff to make sense when your dealing with an unreliable narrator dealing with push back from their employers and then attempting to synthesize a coherent narrative over a large corpus of heterogeneous internal documents, controls, spreadsheets and legal agreements. LLM’s as they exist now are yes men, they are not good at making coherent fact patterns, especially when someone pushes back on them or gives them a red herring or mis-represents something. There’s a long list of things that need to improve for them to gain traction in that industry.

        • By jamesfinlayson 2026-03-134:19

          Maybe - I think my friend's friend is more in the giving nuanced advice space of accounting rather than anything too mathematical.

    • By carlmr 2026-03-131:141 reply

      >We have strong KPIs on how much we use copilot so I must say woof woof to it every day or so to make sure it shows me as an active user (luckily it only shows the latest date someone has used it in each application).

      Ask it to generate a cron job for this.

      • By reportgunner 2026-03-1310:43

        that would just create more evidence of him not using it regularly. not good

  • By HoldOnAMinute 2026-03-1222:513 reply

    This is happening to me too. I am so productive now, with this super power, that my reward is to be given more work.

    • By Pet_Ant 2026-03-1223:072 reply

      That's because everyone else has access to the same tools. If you don't become more productive then you will be replaced with someone who will.

      They only way it'd help you is if you controlled access to AI and it was a competitive advantage for you over a fellow developer. A rising tide lifts all boats... but you are only paid for how much taller you are than the other boats.

      It's important to understand that AI is capital, and it's to the owner of the capital go the spoils. Your capital is in your skills, but they are a commodity and thus you have limited leverage.

      Who benefits from AI is smaller businesses who could not afford custom application development at previous development costs. It's like faster laptops and better IDEs didn't boost developer salaries.

      • By flossposse 2026-03-130:24

        >Who benefits from AI is smaller businesses who could not afford custom application development at previous development costs.

        Of course, as AI reduces the cost to operate in niches, those small businesses who just gained the ability to build an app are also more likely than before to see a bigger player drink their milkshake.

        Not to mention that small businesses will have a harder time absorbing the inevitable price hike that will come once everyone has made themselves completely dependent on AI to get any work done.

      • By thewhitetulip 2026-03-134:031 reply

        VSCode has advanced editor functionalities that not many use. But devs using that functionality aren't replacing devs not using it. Although they also save hours of manual work thanks to multi line cursors

        Thing is, AI is being shoved top-down on devs because it's a goal for everyone, without checking if it's actually helping or hindering.

        What I am seeing is juniors are blindly trusting AI output and say in a few years, it's going to be a disaster because nobody understands anything except seniors

        • By orphea 2026-03-1311:561 reply

            > What I am seeing is juniors are blindly trusting AI output and say in a few years, it's going to be a disaster because nobody understands anything except seniors
          
          I see exactly the same in teams of senior and staff engs, and I promise you - they are not going to understand anything either.

          • By thewhitetulip 2026-03-1314:47

            Ouch. If seniors and staffs do this then the company is doomed.

    • By whatever1 2026-03-134:04

      My issue is that now have a super effective rubber duck.

      The friction that I had in the past to getting started is gone. I have something to work on 30” after I sit on my desk.

      And if something is not working, I have someone eager to discuss with me about it and patiently work towards a solution.

    • By dyauspitr 2026-03-130:401 reply

      Well yeah, that’s the whole point. My company is still at the phase where people have access to LLMs but it’s in the honeymoon phase where expectations for work throughput are still pre LLM but everyone secretly uses them and slacks off the rest of the time.

      • By bibimsz 2026-03-134:03

        I'm not slacking! I'm recharging.

  • By wolvesechoes 2026-03-138:011 reply

    Of course it does, the same way that industrial revolution increased it. Those that tell you about automation by itself is leading to better quality of life, better working conditions etc. either are ignorant, or simply lie to you. All the good stuff we have was obtained through political means. Yes, technology was something that enabled particular outcome, but only if harnessed by political means.

    The fact we can today enjoy 40 hours workweek is not a necessary consequence of steam machine. It is a consequence of people dying while fighting with police and capital henchmen in Chicago, and it other places.

    But keep believing your overlords and their servants.

    • By bluefirebrand 2026-03-1312:36

      > keep believing your overlords and their servants.

      HN is full of servants hoping to be overlords one day. For all the intelligence on this site it's amazing how many lapdogs there are here

      Money makes people pathetic

HackerNews