You're doing crazy gymnastics right now. Eliminating biomes drives animals to extinction. In what world could you argue that doesn't deserve even a little moral consideration?

I'm not going to argue with someone who works this hard to be a contrarian.

You really have nothing productive to say in this thread, you sound irrationally angry. This is a pretty milquetoast philosophical question. If someone asks whether humanity is a net negative environmentally and your only response is to call them whiny losers, maybe you'd be better off on Twitter.

I mean I know you understand what an abstract argument, is but you've chosen to interpret it in the laziest way possible for maximum rage. There are better ways to spend your time.

Extra points for calling yourself a vegan atheist to appeal to credibility.

Is the average person really using Tailscale? This seems plenty deep enough

> Biomes are not moral subjects and don't deserve consideration. (Pigs are).

Where do you think animals live?

So people don't look at the code, or the tests.

So they don't know if it has the right behavior to begin with, or even if the tests are testing the right behavior.

This is what people are talking about. This is why nobody responsible wants to uberscale a serious app this way. It's ridiculous to see so much hype in this thread, people claiming they've built entire businesses without looking at any code. Keep your business away from me, then.