Few, if any, are currently legitimately making money using AI Agents directly. Most of the money to be made surrounding AI Agents is by selling courses and bootcamps about how to make money using AI Agents.

Right. If you are wealthy enough to go retire and live off interest, but STILL choose to work for a company you morally disagree with...then what sort of person are you?

I have attempted to replicate the "workflow" LLM process where several LLMs come up with different variations of a way to solve a problem and a "judge" LLM reviews them and the go through different verification processes to see if this workflow increased the accuracy of the LLM's ability to solve the problem. For me, in my experiments, it didn't really make much difference but at the time I was using LLMs significantly dumber than current frontier models. HOWEVER...When I enable "Thinking Mode" on frontier LLM's like ChatGPT it DOES tend to solve problems that the non-thinking mode isn't able to solve so perhaps it's just a matter of throwing enough iterations at it for the LLM to be able to solve a particular complex problem.

This is basically how "Roo Code" works. It's a VSCode extension.

>The 40 year old who won't date a real girl because he is in love with a bot I'm more concerned with.

I think on the Venn diagram of 40-year-olds only willing to date bots and 40-year-olds capable of actually dating real women, the overlap is incredibly small at this point in time.