> Consider the possibility you're not the only one in the codebase and that the git history might provide the why to the code's what.

I can't win with HN critics. If I talk about someone else looking, then I'm assuming. If I talk about myself, then I'm being too self-centered (in the oblique sense you reference). I am very aware of how this works across teams of people, not just myself, since I'm in industry.

> Story-Telling Commit Messages

No thank you. Talking to future ME, I don't need to know how I got to what I want me to look at.

A squashed ticket-by-ticket set of merges is enough for me.

> Also it sends a message that only scientists are welcome as immigrants.

This is not a conclusion I would make without trying to make an anti-immigrant argument.

Promoting medical misinformation or even health misinformation should be critically judged. Alternative health companies are rubbing their hands together.

The next Drain-o chug challenge "accident" is inevitable, at this rate.

Not sure why you think this is relevant. The issue is about Ruby Central's failure to make a coherent statement or mea culpa, which the Github post does. AI influence is incidental.