There’s no acknowledgment of Node.js trademark on Deno.com … and the landing page is largely about how much better Deno is over Node.js.

Of all places to put trademark acknowledgement, it’d be there - and it’s missing.

https://deno.com/

> a screenshot of the Node.js website to show use of the “JavaScript” trademark. As the creator of Node.js, I find that especially offensive.

There is some irony in that Ryan isn’t acknowledging Node.js own trademark in his post, given that he was the person who announced the Node.js trademark.

https://nodejs.org/en/blog/uncategorized/trademark

So he wants Node.js trademark to be acknowledged, but doesn’t acknowledge it himself.

Oracle wants the JavaScript trademark acknowledged, and he doesn’t want to acknowledge that either.

This all seems very silly to me.

Or just use CSS

  text-wrap: balance

> sending a large volume of malicious traffic

How would an ISP determine egress is malicious? Genuinely curious.

One thing I really appreciate about your site is the transparent pricing—something I haven’t seen on any other platform. It also seems surprisingly affordable, assuming I’m correctly understanding what’s included.

An unsolicited suggestion: it would be helpful if you could clearly walk through how your tool supports GRC compliance. I haven’t been able to find this kind of explanation on your site—or others.

For example, something like this:

Step 1: Select a Program – Choose the compliance framework you’re targeting (e.g., ISO 27001, SOC 2, etc.).

Step 2: Guided Evidence Collection – You’re taken through a step-by-step questionnaire outlining what evidence is needed.

Step 3: Pre-Built Templates – For each requirement, you provide example templates or guidance on what needs to be submitted or completed.

Step 4: Centralized Dashboard – All responses and documents are organized into one place that can be reviewed by an auditor.

Step 5: Auditor Handoff – Once everything is ready, you recommend a third-party auditor to complete the certification process.

It would also be helpful to clarify what’s included in your offering vs. what still requires external engagement (like paying for the actual audit).

Just sharing this in case it’s helpful—apologies if I’ve misunderstood the flow above, but hopefully this illustrates the kind of clarity that might help others too.