Right, and Wikipedia leadership is free of any conflicts of interest:

During and after her Wikimedia role, Maher drew fire for statements perceived as rejecting objective truth or Wikipedia’s traditional “free and open” model:

• In a 2021 TED Talk, she described reverence for truth as potentially a “distraction” hindering common ground.

• She called Wikipedia’s free-and-open ethos a “white male Westernized construct” that excluded diverse communities.

Citation needed.

So we just make things up on HN now? Care to share any examples?

Drivel. They’re selling just as well as Rivians.

Are really suggesting everything in Wikipedia is truthful, complete, and free of all biases?