Kevin Rose (original digg founder) and Alexis Ohanian (a.k.a. kn0thing, original reddit founder) did an AMA recently about restarting digg

(context so people don't have to click links)

Especially because it sounds like the Philippines is pushing for a 4 day workweek, but the rest of SEA is asking people to work from home, use less AC, take the stairs…

This sounds like you're chastising me for something totally distinct from what I was supporting the request for clarity on.

I'm not asking or advocating for using AI as a copy editor.

The post I replied to asked about using Gemini as if it's Wikipedia - that is, saying "according to Gemini" when citing a fact where one might have once wrote "according to Wikipedia" or even "according to Google."

This is a forum people hang out in part-time. It's nobody's job to go spend an hour researching primary sources to post a comment. Shallow searches and citations are common and often helpful in pointing someone in the right direction. As AI becomes commonplace, a lot of that is being done with AI.

"Can I have AI write a reply for me?"

is a very different question than

"Can I cite an AI search result?"

This rule change is clear about the former. There's room to clarify the latter.

This is how I would use/expect AI to be used in HN. I would also like this clarified.

Nice to see you here!

Was really impressed by your work on Pundle. (It was an amazingly fast HMR dev environment - much like Vite today.) Felt like I was the only one using it, but it was hard to walk away from instant updates.