That is so sleezy.

Restaurants and dishes at home made by someone else that have a combination of different foods.

The article and OpenAI themselves contradict you. Do you work at OpenAI?

> Why could a court favor the interest of the New York Times in a vague accusation versus the interest and right of hundred millions people?

It simply didn't. ChatGPT hasn't deleted any user data.

> "OpenAI did not 'destroy' any data, and certainly did not delete any data in response to litigation events," OpenAI argued. "The Order appears to have incorrectly assumed the contrary."

It's a bit of a stretch to think a big tech company like ChatGPT is deleting users' data.