>I'd say maybe 20%, 30% of the code that is inside of our repos today and some of our projects are probably all written by software.

This sentence is carefully crafted. It's an opinion, not a statement of fact, so he can cover his ass. In other words, legal lying. Elon Musk does the same thing all the time. Somehow, the markets don't see through the obvious bullshit.

I'm not going to engage with you on a debate because you aren't acting in good faith.

I don't even know what the selling point of AI is for regular people. In the 60s it was possible for a man to work an ordinary job, buy a house, settle down with a wife and support two or three children. That's completely out of the realm of reality for many young people now and the plummeting birth rates show it.

The middle class have financially benefited very little from the past 20+ years of productivity gains.

Social media is driving society apart, making people selfish, jealous, and angry.

Do people really think more technology is going to be the path to a better society? Because to me it looks like the opposite. It will just be used to stomp on ordinary people and create even more inequality.

That’s funny. I spotted a similar issue in their Go SDK[1] a few years back. I was pretty appalled to see such a basic mistake from a security company, but then again it is Okta. [1]: https://github.com/okta/okta-sdk-golang/issues/306

My completely unqualified opinion is that this kind of behaviour is linked directly to intellectual ability. Returning the cart requires self-discipline but also implies a thought process around upholding and creating social order. Even fear of shame implies a desire to uphold social standing with others.

Whereas not returning the cart can only be explained in two ways: a thought process that says ‘not my problem’ (selfish, disorderly, bad for society) or no thought process at all, like an animal with no higher order thinking.