i worry about Dioxus. not because "they're going to be destroyed by their VC funding" directly, but indirectly. is this a sustainable endeavor? does the market really want them or care about them? it's hard to consider and commit to them, when it's unclear if they're sustainable or just running on the fumes of a passionate founder three months away from marking the project as unmaintained and walking away.

to that end, while i find beauty in dioxus, i've been more willy to play with expo.

while i'm sympathetic to your position, the truth is that /that/ is where this site is now.

the method for databases to talk to each other is via?

if we're not talking about replicas, we're talking about coordination at the app level, right?

i think this is aligned with the author's choice. a separate schema is effectively a separate database (from a product eng perspective) with shared infra.

at one point, HN was anti-censorship. this discussion shows how ideologically aligned this concept has become.

there are volleys back and forth of "what censorship" followed by links to wikipedia enumerating it. RT and Joe Rogan are thrown in the mix.

when did this experiment fail?