...

exfalso

144

Karma

2012-11-22

Created

Recent Activity

  • It's failing when there is no data in the training set, and there are no patterns to replicate in the existing code base.

    I can give you many, many examples of where it failed for me:

    1. Efficient implementation of Union-Find: complete garbage result 2. Spark pipelines: mostly garbage 3. Fuzzer for testing something: half success, non-replicateable ("creative") part was garbage. 4. Confidential Computing (niche): complete garbage if starting from scratch, good at extracting existing abstractions and replicating existing code.

    Where it succeeds: 1. SQL queries 2. Following more precise descriptions of what to do 3. Replicating existing code patterns

    The pattern is very clear. Novel things, things that require deeper domain knowledge, coming up with the to-be-replicated patterns themselves, problems with little data don't work. Everything else works.

    I believe the reason why there is a big split in the reception is because senior engineers work on problems that don't have existing solutions - LLMs are terrible at those. What they are missing is that the software and the methodology must be modified in order to make the LLM work. There are methodical ways to do this, but this shift in the industry is still in baby shoes, and we don't yet have a shared understanding of what this methodology is.

    Personally I have very strong opinions on how this should be done. But I'm urging everyone to start thinking about it, perhaps even going as far as quitting if this isn't something people can pursue at their current job. The carnage is coming:/

  • Nope. Especially with these agents the thinking trace can get very large. No human will ever read it, and the agent will fill up their context with garbage trying to look for information.

    I understand the drive for stabilizing control and consistency, but this ain't the way.

  • This is a terrible idea

  • Yes that's the idea. The expansion simply means that the window of migration will close. Once it's closed, your galaxy is cut off and will run out of fuel sooner than the high-density area.

  • There's a fun hypothesis I've read about somewhere, goes something like this:

    As the universe expands the gap between galaxies widens until they start "disappearing" as no information can travel anymore between them. Therefore, if we assume that intelligent lifeforms exist out there, it is likely that these will slowly converge to the place in the universe with the highest mass density for survival. IIRC we even know approximately where this is.

    This means a sort of "grand meeting of alien advanced cultures" before the heat death. Which in turn also means that previously uncollided UUIDs may start to collide.

    Those damned Vogons thrashing all our stats with their gazillion documents. Why do they have a UUID for each xml tag??

HackerNews