>Real estate(the land, not the mansion) is a really good long term storage of wealth as it is fixed, finite, and doesn't depreciate in value except through market trend and it basically only go up as long as the economy itself grow.

None of this is true.

Step by step:

>as it is fixed

Something not being able to be moved is a negative, not a positive

>finite

New land is created all the time. The netherlands has created an entire new province.

> and doesn't depreciate in value

Only true legally. I can assure you land does depreciate, as can any farmer that has used it to farm the same crop for years and now finds its yields reduced as a result.

>except through market trend

So, just like any other asset?

> it basically only go up as long as the economy itself grow.

Untrue, simply check any number of rural areas that have had the life drained out of them over the past 50 years.

Land is useful, but let's not pretend like it's something it isn't.

>There's literally 0 startups I've been part of where data protection laws or even the infamous cookie banners have been anywhere near relevant (unless your business was literally profiling).

Thats kind of the point...

> clearer safe harbors for small actors

Different rules for different people huh?

Just because you like the group you're benefiting and dislike the group you're harming doesn't mean that is good policy.

>Like, if you overstayed Schengen visa for one day because you messed up with counting entry and exit days, but used it otherwise for its intended purpose, the border officer likely won't even notice.

When that wasn't automated that might have been the case (not that its a good thing).

It's certainly not the case now that there is literally an API that tracks that.

I can reduce reported crime rates by simply not doing anything about the crime that is reported for extended periods of time. People understand that reporting does nothing and so they stop bothering to do it.