Honestly I wish other Macbooks came in colours other than grey and light grey. It's a bit drab, I miss the pearly white or the space black ones.

I disagree. An analytics tool that's correct 99.9% of the time is not 0.1% less valuable than a tool that is always correct. It's 100% less valuable.

Outage is the easy failure mode. I can work around a service that's up 80% of the time, but is 100% correct. A service that's up 100% of the time but is 80% correct is useless.

> Something I'm starting to struggle with is when agents can now do longer and more complex tasks, how do you review all the code?

Same as before. Small PRs, accept that you won't ship a month of code in two days. Pair program with someone else so the review is just a formality.

The value of the review is _also_ for someone else to check if you have built the right thing, not just a thing the right way, which is exponentially harder as you add code.

There might still be plenty of room to compete, especially at $15-$25 per review. I'm starting to feel like the right harness makes more difference than the right model.

The real competition for both claude and the platforms is a skill running locally against the very same code.

Similarly, I don't get how people can see the rate of progress and take it for granted that it'll maintain the same cadence, or even accelerate.

We went from the first airplane flight to walking on the moon in about 60 years. We had regular supersonic commercial flights shortly after. Applying the same logic, we should all be routinely flying to Pluto, travelling in flying cars like in the Jetsons, and commuting from Sydney to New York every day like it's nothing.