...

mediaman

5891

Karma

2009-04-20

Created

Recent Activity

  • I'm unclear what statement this is trying to make.

    Is it meant to draw equivalence between crypto and Tesla/SpaceX? That each has roughly similar (i.e., low) value to humanity, or value as businesses?

    Is it that the metric of whether a person makes others money is invalid?

    The comment seems coy, possibly to avoid making any claim at all, but it must not be that because that wouldn't be very sporting.

  • 10 USC 3252 has only been used once, against Acronis AG, a Swiss company with Russian connections.

    Acronis did not have DOD contracts.

    Other companies (Huawei) have been deemed risks under different laws, or by Congress, but they also didn't have direct DOD contracts.

    Do you have any evidence for your assertion? Did you check if it is true before posting?

  • It's odd because I no longer really like ChatGPT. For chat-type requests, I prefer Claude, or if it's knowledge-intensive then Gemini 3 Pro (which is better for history, old novels, etc).

    But GPT 5.3 Codex is great. Significantly better than Opus, in the TUI coding agent.

  • Why not? It's a physical building with lots of equipment that produces products shipped to its customers.

    Its products are sequences of electrons, instead of atoms. But so are power plants. And in the context of what happens when they're hit by missiles, a factory, data center, and power plant all behave the same.

  • They have not; a social media post does not satisfy the requirements of 10 USC section 3252.

    They are required to notify Congress (they have not), prepare a report with specific sections (they have not), and the reasons must fall within a set of categories outlined by statute (this does not).

    There will be a court fight and they will lose, just like they lost the tariff battle, because of poor competence.

    (Trump's post on Truth Social was actually fine. He said the USG would stop doing business with Anthropic, which is within its legal right. Hegseth's follow-on post is the problem. It is possible that Trump did not expect or want Hegseth to do that, that this was meant as bluster to bump along the negotiations; Hegseth has a recent history of stepping out of line within the administration and irritating people like Rubio.)

HackerNews