...

msp26

917

Karma

2023-06-12

Created

Recent Activity

  • I got claude to reverse engineer the extension and compare to changedetection and here's what it came up with. Apologies for clanker slop but I think its in poor taste to not attribute the opensource tool that the service is built on (one that's also funded by their SaaS plan)

    ---

    Summary: What Is Objectively Provable

    - The extension stores its config under the key changedetection_config

    - 16 API endpoints in the extension are 1:1 matches with changedetection.io's documented API

    - 16 data model field names are exact matches with changedetection.io's Watch model (including obscure ones like time_between_check_use_default, history_n, notification_muted, fetch_backend)

    - The authentication mechanism (x-api-key header) is identical

    - The default port (5000) matches changedetection.io's default

    - Custom endpoints (/auth/, /feature-flags, /email/, /generate_key, /pregate) do NOT exist in changedetection.io — these are proprietary additions

    - The watch limit error format is completely different from changedetection.io's, adding billing-specific fields (current_plan, upgrade_required)

    - The extension ships with error tracking that sends telemetry (including user emails on login) to the developer's GlitchTip server at 100% sample rate

    The extension is provably a client for a modified/extended changedetection.io backend. The open question is only the degree of modification - whether it's a fork, a proxy wrapper, or a plugin system. But the underlying engine is unambiguously changedetection.io.

  • many tasks don't need any reasoning

  • What the fuck is this price hike? It was such a nice low end, fast model. Who needs 10 years of reasoning on this model size??

    I'm gonna switch some workflows to qwen3.5.

    There's a lot of tasks that benefit from just having a mildly capable LLM and 2.5 Flash Lite worked out of the box for cheap.

    Can we get flash lite lite please?

    Edit: Logan said: "I think open source models like Gemma might be the answer here"

    Implying that they're not interested in serving lower end Gemini models?

HackerNews