That actually sounds more interesting than the one Meta created previously.

But still not interesting.

Or just use Zulip?

Yes this is a common release practice.

However this is a different situation as we’re talking about running arbitrarily found third-party scripts. I can’t imagine that was ever intended to be done in production.

Fun story, when I worked at Facebook in the earlier days someone accidentally made a change that effectively set the release flags for every single feature to be live on production. That was a day… we had to completely wipe out memcached to stop the broken features and then the database was hammered to all hell.

Selecting the wrong environment in your test setup by mistake?

I refuse to believe that someone on the security team intentionally tested random user scripts in production on purpose.

And despite their broadly similar performance, the RK3588s have significantly better power draw.

However I’m not sure of any of the rk3588 vendors that support both UEFI and have a full-size PCIe slot like the MS-R1 has.