If getting people to review code is that hard that seems like a problem for our new AI age. AI coding appears to rely on getting people to review a lot code and assumes those people will catch the errors.

China is a mixed economy with some capitalist parts and some socialist parts just like us. Their mix is just a bit more effective than our mix than our mix and they have higher scale.

One fanciful idea is that we are living in a simulation designed by a society post butlerian jihad to show new people the dangers of AI

> If they don't have enough details to implement a solution, they will ask the client for details.

but LLMs are chat bots. Surely eventually someone will set up an LLM based coding system that can ask architecture and design questions before starting to code.

People, including the author of this article, say that design and architecture are the hard parts, but I think long term those are just as solvable as coding.

I think architecture will become like an installer. Some kind of agent orchestration system will ask you "do you want this or that" and guide you through various architecture choices when you set up a project, or when those choices arise.

And for design, now that code is fast and easy to generate, an agent system can just generate two, three or four versions of the UX for each feature and ask "do you like this one, this one or that one?".

So a switch from upfront design / architecture choices you have to put into prompts to the agent orchestration system asking you to make a choice when the choice becomes relevant.