Isn't this just checking packages against known cves, which wouldn't help for undiscovered or unannounced vulnerabilities. Let me know if I've misunderstood, I'm basing off the documentation site.

Also I find the irony goes hard in their recommendation of installing another attack surface (brew) on Linux and missing the point.

I was hoping to see the same. As I understand this, it would lock the notes to obsidian only, instead of being somewhat agnostic to the note taker medium.

Teams are not a static concept, they change members over time and so talking to them has a net zero effect. The newer members will not understand this clever new concept that was introduced, worse, they will misunderstand it or work around it. Which brings us back to don't make me think. If the concepts can be kept as simple as possible, which overlaps greatly with readability, it will have achieved its purpose.

> Introducing Rust is impossible for some platforms and hard for others.

Please could someone elaborate on this.