As a work of literature, I applaud your Swiftian “modest proposal”.

Before the misuse, there is opportunity to predict that misuse is certain to occur.

There’s money to be made selling AI plausible deniability machines that allow end users to enact unethical policies while evading accountability, but only if all moral responsibility ostensibly falls on the end user and none on the dealer.

“Tough on crime” -> lenient on police -> innocent grandmas in jail.

> facial recognition showed she was the main suspect in what Fargo police called an organized bank fraud case.

> Her bank records showed she was more than 1,200 miles away, at home in Tennessee at the same time police claimed she was in Fargo committing fraud.

> Unable to pay her bills from jail, she lost her home, her car and even her dog