Yeah, but the order is still

1. create value, then

2. capture some of that created value.

Some people want to skip step 1.

Some bigco jobs have felt that way to me: I don't know if I'm actually creating anything valuable, but I'm getting paid. I think the people who are most anxious right now are the ones who suspect they're not really creating anything of real-world value, and they're terrified that they're about to stop getting paid as well.

He's kinda famous, he cracked the iPhone and PS3 as a teenager.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Hotz

In fairness to geohot, who exactly is an expert on what's going to happen to the labour markets as a result of AI? Whose take should I be weighing more heavily than this one?

Or should people just not bother sharing their opinions on this matter? Since it's impossible to predict the future.

Did you ever play cities: skylines? Keeping traffic manageable was a big part of the gameplay. Without good transit the roads would all gridlock regardless of how many lanes you add to the highways.

> That's the whole mechanism... Local perception. Local action.

> it’s not communication. It’s physics.

Dude, if you’re going to go to all the trouble to make something cool why don’t you take like 20 minutes to write in your own voice about it! I’m so tired of reading robot slop.