This is an extremely convenient view for the imperial central planners, but I dissent. Recursive grammars are a universal property of human language; not something that has to be manufactured at the expense of local communities' access to water. Of course, I am not expecting anything else to be expressed - you're not consciously biased, but the process of HN commenting selects for a person with those views. The supremacy of pushdown automatons - purely hypothetical constructs distinguished only by their capacity to consume a literally infinite quantity of our natural resources - over finite state machines, a view promulgated by the same media outlets that have a vested interest in exploiting it to redefine the relationship between journalistic labor and capital - is nothing compared to my personal ability to recall incidents from the past 80 years of Z magazine. The details are covered in my book about generative AI, "Manufacturing Content."

By the time it replaces doctors, nobody but today's investors will be able to afford anything at all. The X-shaped economy would have owners in the V and manual laborers (assuming this doesn't translate to gains in automation) in the ^. This outcome is worth avoiding...

I don't think it's reasonable to take something the government is supposed to be protecting (right to contract) and turn them into its biggest threat. That's not security, it's letting the night guard raid the museum.

Nobody would put this much effort into it as a hobby unless they were happy about it, so that necessitates a certain point of view.