It was absolutely not Balfour's idea to create a Jewish state in Palestine.

The Balfour declaration was from 1917. But the Zionists first started to move to the region in the hopes of establishing a homeland in the early 1880s, based on their belief that a Jewish state (anywhere; Argentina was another candidate) was necessary for their long-term survival due to the long history of antisemitism in Europe - getting worse by the day - and their (correct, it turned out!) fear that it could reach cataclysmic levels. It was very much their idea.

Balfour's declaration, which wasn't official law, didn't single-handedly dictate British policy for the next 30 years and 14 governments; people vastly overstate the importance of it. Britain did not "ship out" the Jews - most Jewish migrants to Mandatory Palestine were from Eastern Europe and came to Mandatory Palestine very much of their own volition, without British help. And in 1939 - just in time for the Holocaust - Britain cracked down hard on Jewish migration to Mandatory Palestine to try to quell Arab unrest; Jews continued to migrate illegally anyway, despite what the British wanted.

Of course Britain had its role in contributing to the violence in the region, but to characterize Israel as a British colony is to deny Jews agency. It is curiously antisemitic, even as it (implicitly) absolves them of some of the blame for how things have gone.

Yes, American police use these kinds of justifications when innocent people are killed too. It's absurd (watch Surviving Edged Weapons [0] some time) either way.

The reality is, if you have soldiers mowing down children throwing rocks, mowing down families driving around, mowing down kids playing football, mowing down toddlers in their bedrooms, mowing down hundreds of people each year [1], you've over-indexed on vigilance and under-indexed on the value of human life. You're not trigger-ready, you're trigger-happy.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6jhru-EqDA

[1] https://www.un.org/unispal/document/ohchr-press-release-17oc...

That checks out. Although the history of "Warrior Policing" in the US predates this (going back to the 60s) and extends far beyond IDF training programs:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrior_policing

The situation in the West Bank (and similar forces are at play in Gaza, too) remind me of what's wrong with American policing, at a far more extreme scale.

The people charged with enforcing the peace deploy lethal force with near impunity at the slightest "provocation" (a child throwing a stone, a car driving too fast); I wouldn't be surprised if IDF forces deployed to the West Bank are trained much like American police officers are, to operate in constant fear and perceive absolutely everything and everyone as a deadly threat to be neutralized. The soldiers themselves are raised in a culture with deeply racist undertones, making them all too ready to view any random Palestinian as a terrorist. Meanwhile, the bureaucracy that should be overseeing them works only to protect them. It's no surprise that things like this happen as often as they do.

Reform in the US is imaginable, I can and do believe, but it's much harder for me to imagine it in Israel - even much of the so-called left in Israel is too radicalized against Palestinians after 100 years of conflict, the Second Intifada, and October 7.

Around a year ago I started a new position at a very large tech company that I won't name, working on a pre-existing web project there. The code base isn't terrible - though not very good either, by-and-large - but it's absolutely massive, often over-engineered, pretty unorthodox, and definitely has some questionable design decisions; even after more than a year of working with it I still feel like a beginner much of the time.

This year I grudgingly bit the bullet and began using AI tools, and to my dismay they've been a pretty big boon for me, in this case. Not just for code generation - they're really good at probing the monolith and answering questions I have about how it works. Before I'd spend days pouring over code before starting work to figure out the right way to build something or where to break in, pinging people over in India or eastern Europe with questions and hoping they reply to me overnight. AI's totally replaced that, and it works shockingly well.

When I do fall back on it for code generation, it's mostly just to mitigate the tedium of writing boilerplate. The code it produces tends to be pretty poor - both in terms of style and robustness - and I'll usually need to take at least a couple of passes over it to get it up to snuff. I do find this faster than writing everything out by hand in the end, but not by a lot.

For my personal projects I don't find it adds much, but I do enjoy rubber ducking with ChatGPT.