Sounds good, however the bar is probably too far and far too idealistic.

The effects of vibecoding destroys trust inside teams and orgs, between engineers.

What if you review 50%? Or 10%? Or only 1%, is it not vibe coding yet?

Where is the borderline?

> “Agentic engineering” feels like the response of engineers who use AI to write code, but want to maintain the skill distinction to the pure “vibe coders.”

If there's such. The border is vague at most.

There're "known unknowns" and "unknown unknowns" when working with systems. In this terms, there's no distinction between vibe-coding and agentic engineering.

Write to their support. Oh, wait.

> People say AI is “good at front end” but I see the worst kind of atrocities there

It's commonly universal to say "AI is great in X", where one is not professional in X. It's because that's how AI is designed: to output tokens according to stats, not logic, not semantic, and not meaning: stats.