Carlos Slim cancels his collaboration with Elon Musk's Starlink

2025-02-2722:41234238mexicodailypost.com

In a significant business development, Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim has decided to cancel his collaboration with Elon Musk's Starlink. The decision

In a significant business development, Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim has decided to cancel his collaboration with Elon Musk’s Starlink. The decision comes after a series of tensions between the two magnates, culminating in Slim’s choice to invest in his own infrastructure rather than relying on Starlink’s satellite technology.

Slim’s company, América Móvil, announced plans to invest $22 billion over the next three years to enhance its telecommunications infrastructure. This move is seen as a strategic effort to strengthen its position in the market and reduce dependency on external partners like Starlink. The decision is expected to have a substantial financial impact on Musk’s company, which had anticipated a lucrative partnership in Latin America.

The fallout between Slim and Musk was further exacerbated by a controversial tweet from Musk, which implied connections between Slim and organized crime. This accusation, although unproven, added fuel to the already strained relationship between the two business tycoons.

By opting to develop its own infrastructure, América Móvil aims to maintain control over its operations and ensure the reliability of its services. This decision marks a significant shift in the dynamics of the telecommunications industry in Latin America, highlighting the competitive nature of the market and the strategic maneuvers of its key players.

Elon Musk shared a post on his social network stating that Slim could have ties to criminal groups, and five minutes later, Carlos Slim canceled all business collaborations with Starlink in Latin America, which made Musk lose 7 billion US dollars.

An hour later, Slim announced that he would transfer his projects for the next 5 years with Starlink, an investment of 22 billion dollars, to companies in China and Europe.

More than money, Musk lost his main partner in 25 countries, in addition to giving up all that territory to companies of his competition and, most seriously, causing the USA to continue losing commercial presence and giving it to China.

Source: Milenio

Monterrey Daily Post


Read the original article

Comments

  • By kklisura 2025-02-2723:496 reply

    > The fallout between Slim and Musk was further exacerbated by a controversial tweet from Musk, which implied connections between Slim and organized crime.

    Instant flashback when Elon called Thai cave diver a "pedo guy" when they declined his help. Elon needs to take rejections way less personally.

    • By insane_dreamer 2025-02-280:354 reply

      > Elon needs to take rejections way less personally.

      That's putting it mildly. For someone with that much power and influence to have some petty vengeful tendencies is extremely dangerous. It's like the "off with your head" tyrants of old.

      • By yodsanklai 2025-02-281:033 reply

        I wonder if he had done more than insulted or fired people. With his wealth, he could inflict more damage to his enemies.

        • By ZeroGravitas 2025-02-287:49

          He sent private detectives to dig up dirt on the caver he called "pedo guy" and told journalists they were defending an abuser of children with very specific, totally invented, details to the accusation.

          He also then got away with it in court because he claimed he wasn't making an accusation, just using a generic insult.

        • By tarsinge 2025-02-2810:011 reply

          Looking at his mental and physical health I'm inclined to think that people just fantasize way too much about what wealth can really buy.

          • By yodsanklai 2025-02-2810:131 reply

            In the case of health, I can see how having too much money can potentially be detrimental. If he tries hard, he can find doctors prescribing unnecessary pills or surgeries.

            • By senordevnyc 2025-02-2812:021 reply

              I sincerely doubt he has to try hard at all.

              • By yodsanklai 2025-02-2813:321 reply

                I naively think that the best doctors (that he has access too) would do what's best for the patient and would push back unreasonable requests.

                • By ben_w 2025-03-0114:24

                  "The best doctors he can afford" != "the best doctors he's willing to listen to".

                  Consider for example Steve Jobs: despite his wealth, he resisted his doctors' recommendations for medical intervention for nine months in favor of alternative medicine.

        • By rasz 2025-02-285:40

          When Elon Musk Tried to Destroy a Tesla Whistleblower https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-03-13/when-elon...

      • By nswest23 2025-03-0115:17

        > Elon needs to take rejections way less personally.

        taking things personally is the hallmark of the trump administration. see the press conference with Zelenskyy yesterday.

      • By quesera 2025-02-280:531 reply

        Imagine if the US had a President and Commander in Chief with that kind of disposition!

        • By tough 2025-02-280:56

          wait is not that just real life

      • By marcusverus 2025-02-281:296 reply

        [flagged]

        • By h0l0cube 2025-02-282:041 reply

          > This is a weird take. The "pedo guy" guy told Elon to stick the submarine up his ass.

          The weird thing here is that Elon waltzed in with a 'solution' that was ostensibly flawed to anyone but those with the most superficial understanding of what was required, and blithely presented it to actual experts who were putting their lives at risk, and then expected to be praised. What would be normal, would have been to graciously take the reality check he was given and adjust his priors. This is what actually intelligent people do: they learn; they grow up. And maybe one day, Elon will make it to adulthood, but his early fortunes have insulated him from any need for introspection.

          • By sidibe 2025-02-282:251 reply

            Something getting attention without Elon is simply unacceptable. The news was obsessed with the cave story there was no way he wasn't going to jump into that story.

            • By h0l0cube 2025-02-282:542 reply

              I don't think he's purely about attention, but he craves a particular kind of attention. The kind that the gifted schoolboy gets when they put their hand up in class to a tricky question posed to the class. This might have been his only validation in childhood, or at least the one that was most rewarding, and now his whole life is based around being the clever guy in the front of the class. Most gifted children course-correct some kind of humility in their adult years, either voluntarily or by being humbled by reality, but Elon is yet to meet the moment of his awakening. Being told he's wrong in front of the whole class is the most mortifying thing he's experienced, but he has enough money, enough sycophants surrounding him, and enough momentum is his business ventures (so far) to keep making the same mistakes without any reflection.

              • By palmotea 2025-02-285:341 reply

                > I don't think he's purely about attention, but he craves a particular kind of attention. The kind that the gifted schoolboy gets when they put their hand up in class to a tricky question posed to the class.

                This is a pretty interesting interview with a journalist who appears to have spent a fair bit of time with Musk: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/07/opinion/ezra-klein-podcas.... It made this relevant observation:

                > Which I felt was a little dramatic. And I thought: Wow, this is a man in his 40s who thinks that he’s the center of the universe. So it always has that element of drama.

                > I think he’s greatly informed by video games. Someone described him to me as Ready Player One, and everybody else is an N.P.C. — a nonplayer character. He always has to be the hero or the person who matters the most. Sometimes he does, and sometimes he has engineered it — getting the founder role when he’s not actually the founder or rewriting history or using public relations to make himself the founder.

                > He understands the hero’s journey kind of thing rather well. Also the stakes have to be very high, and if it doesn’t work, we’re doomed. He tends to overstate problems. Most companies have problems, but: Everything is a disaster here, and I’m here to fix it. Or: Everything sucks, and everybody previously is criminal or evil or “pedophiles.” A word he likes to use a lot.

                > In one tweet, he called Yoel Roth, who was head of trust and safety at Twitter, “evil.” And said that I was “filled with seething hate” — which is really dramatic and ridiculous. I’m not seething with hate.

                • By h0l0cube 2025-02-2821:021 reply

                  Ezra Klein has many axes to grind, so I take his commentary with a grain of salt, but it's probably right that Elon has become a solipsist with a savior complex, and harbors the attendant cognitive dissonance that comes with that. I still hold some hope that one day he'll snap out of it, but that won't happen unless he finds himself in a dire situation.

                  • By palmotea 2025-03-015:491 reply

                    > Ezra Klein has many axes to grind, so I take his commentary with a grain of salt

                    That quote wasn't from Ezra Klein, it was from Kara Swisher. Klein was interviewing her.

              • By anal_reactor 2025-02-285:24

                > The kind that the gifted schoolboy gets when they put their hand up in class to a tricky question posed to the class.

                I completely forgot this feeling and now I want it back

        • By FireBeyond 2025-02-281:58

          Speaking of weird takes. The rescuers first response wasn't "stick it up your ass", it was that they had a workable solution, the team to execute it and the last thing necessary was an even bigger media circus. Elon pouted and whined that he wasn't being taken seriously, and -then- that quote came out. That quote from, by the way, someone who was actually in the middle of coordinating the rescue, being harangued by reporters as to why they weren't indulging Musk's spur-of-the-moment idea that wasn't even remotely feasible (Musk hadn't even considered the cave geometry).

          I find it borderline offensive that you equate someone under stress saying "stick it up his ass" as "toxic attitude" that is on the same level as going to the media and saying "I have evidence that this person is a pedophile" (Oh, not to mention the fact that Musk then fucking HIRED a PI to try to gather evidence for when he was called on his bullshit).

          "Stick it up your ass" and "I have evidence that you are a pedophile" are not "reflections of the same".

          "Stick it up your ass" won't ruin anybody's life. Being falsely accused of pedophilia can, has, and does ruin lives.

          I think it takes a clear bias to even conflate the two in some attempt to defend Musk and make the cave diver the bad guy.

        • By insane_dreamer 2025-02-282:47

          > Or it's like a normal person making a normal mistake.

          Except that like the kings of old, Elon is not a normal person, and therefore his "mistakes" are not normal either, because they have repercussions.

          The whole point is that with great power comes great responsibility. And when you have someone who can't handle that power responsibly without lashing out the way Elon does in a highly immature manner, then you do wind up with a modern version of the "off with your head" tyrant. Sure, he may not cut off your head, but he can cut off your livelihood.

        • By Freedom2 2025-02-282:471 reply

          > stick the submarine up his ass

          This isn't accurate.

          > "He can stick his submarine where it hurts," Unsworth replied. [1]

          There are plenty of places that a submarine can go where it will hurt, such as ear canals. You are assuming in bad faith that Unsworth told him to place it in a specific area.

          [1]: https://www.npr.org/2018/07/16/629348178/elon-musk-and-briti...

        • By ASalazarMX 2025-02-281:451 reply

          > But being an asshole back to an asshole is hardly a red flag.

          Being an asshole is almost always a red flag. It's like teaching someone to not eat grilled babies by eating grilled babies yourself to show them how bad it looks.

    • By georgemcbay 2025-02-281:23

      > Elon needs to take rejections way less personally.

      True, but Elon needs to worry most about the fact that when all the MAGA voters who aren't independently wealthy fully realize the current administration is throwing all the poors under the bus and not just the brown ones he is the useful idiot that is going to take the public fall to try to create some distance between the political fallout and the GOP.

      Its pretty obvious to anyone with any political acumen that they are allowing him to be the public facing figurehead for all of this "efficiency" specifically to allow him to fill that role when the time comes.

      That said, he'll be fully deserving of everything that happens IMO. I ain't saying any of this to try to warn him, I don't think his ego would allow him to believe it in any case.

    • By ks2048 2025-02-280:176 reply

      I'm absolutely opposed to Musk and happy to see anyone trying to diminish his power... But, Slim having some connections to organized crime (cartels) seems much less far fetched than other Musk outbursts.

      • By mandeepj 2025-02-280:531 reply

        > I'm absolutely opposed to Musk and happy to see anyone trying to diminish his power

        Midterms!!

        • By jfengel 2025-02-2817:091 reply

          I can't see why the midterms would do anything to unseat him. Thus far what we've gotten from the current administration is exactly what they promised. I don't see why anybody would change their vote (or decision not to vote).

          The House is close enough that the ordinary midterm power shifts could suffice to change it. And that would at least enable a certain amount of investigation-cum-harassment. But it's less likely to change both houses, and unless that happens with a substantial margin, it'll be hard to pass significant legislation to change anything.

          • By mandeepj 2025-03-014:15

            > I can't see why the midterms would do anything to unseat him.

            Hopefully, today, you realized what midterms will do to unseat him. The mockery of what US stands for has been going on since Jan/20 and people have been watching.

      • By FireBeyond 2025-02-282:00

        So let's be clear, Musk, when a deal seems possible, "Cartels? None of my business, not my problem, let's make a deal."

        Musk, when it falls through, "Oh, he's just in bed with the cartels. I wouldn't want to do business with him."

        He and Trump have a lot alike in that regard. "Best people, smartest people" when they're new and still in favor. "Who?" "Stupid person, who hired him?" when not.

      • By freejazz 2025-02-280:52

        It didn't seem to bother Musk beforehand...

      • By loloquwowndueo 2025-02-280:311 reply

        Why?

        • By ks2048 2025-02-281:041 reply

          I don’t really know - but the power of the Mexican Cartels suggests they have connections into the Mexican oligarchy.

          More credible than a random guy in Thailand being “a pedo” because he disagreed with Musk.

      • By foogazi 2025-02-283:261 reply

        Why ? What do you know ?

        • By kyleee 2025-02-2817:19

          Basically all politicians in Mexico are “serving at the pleasure of the cartels” so to say, so it would be far fetched to think the cartes don’t try to extract concessions from the wealthy as well. Plata o plomo

      • By aorloff 2025-02-281:08

        Musk, who has personal calls with Putin. But you were saying ?

    • By hcarvalhoalves 2025-02-280:04

      A billionaire Asperger high on ketamine, can't stay out of the limelight for a single day, and for every stupid thought, media gives him some more attention. It's a vicious cycle.

    • By aaron695 2025-02-281:43

      [dead]

    • By harry8 2025-02-281:053 reply

      [flagged]

      • By defrost 2025-02-281:262 reply

        > One of them specifically described his help as useless and a publicity stunt. He stated on CNN that Elon could “stick his submarine where it hurts”.

        That appears to have occurred in an interview held some hours after Musk referred to him as "Pedo guy".

        Which makes some sense, the interview and questions were only "newsworthy" after the reaction to the Musk tweet.

        • By harry8 2025-02-289:19

          Another one supporting the sequence CNN interview, then pedo tweet:

          https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-12/elon-musk-faces-defam...

          >Mr Musk called Mr Unsworth a "pedo" in a July 15 post on his Twitter account after Mr Unsworth, in an interview with CNN, dismissed Mr Musk's attempts to help rescue the boys as a "PR stunt".

          Hate on Musk (or anyone). Be accurate is the message here.

          Musk calling a hero a pedo with no evidence in response after (correctly?) being accused of having a garbage solution that couldn't work and he could stick it on international tv is appalling.

          Added: I wonder if it was the pro or anti musk faction that flagged the call fo accuracy ad provided references. Even more amusing if both.

        • By harry8 2025-02-287:382 reply

          I have the sequence the other way around. The pedo guy quote in response to the hero of the day describing musk those terms.

          Is there source that confirms the sequence either way?

          Added: Checking, the guardian story I linked has the pedo guy tweet after musk’s submarine was described as a publicity stunt on cnn.

          • By defrost 2025-02-289:27

            I hunted about - https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/15/elon-musk...

            is a better article for sequence, although the twitter dates are not helpful - the embedded in a tweet interview clip has the date of the tweet and not the date of the interview. That was tweeted after the Musk pedo tweet.

            The quote was:

              He can “stick his submarine where it hurts,” Unsworth said during the interview in Thailand.
            
            before going in detail about why the sub idea was impractical (as was stated by several others at the time).

            It doesn't justify the "Pedo Guy" accusation though, Musk was clearly being a attention seeking nuisance and getting in the way of an ongoing rescue effort.

      • By FireBeyond 2025-02-282:031 reply

        His help WAS going to be useless (mostly because Musk's design completely failed to account for the cave geometry) and of course it was a publicity stunt. There's a team of international cave rescuers and medical professionals on scene, but what do they know? Musk literally announced his "plan" to the media before anyone on scene. That's the definition of a publicity stunt.

        Oh, and if you just called me a pedophile to the world, WHILE I've been up for 30 hours straight coordinating a cave diving rescue, and the media keeps asking me "Why not Musk's submarine?", you know what, I'd probably say something a lot less polite than "he can stick it up his ass".

        • By harry8 2025-02-288:12

          I don’t disagree with any of that other than I’m pretty sure the sequence is the other way around. The guardian story linked, published at the time has the sequence cnn interview calling it a publicity stunt and the pedo guy tweet after that. Unless I’m reading it wrong somehow or they messed up the story?

      • By insane_dreamer 2025-02-283:10

        you're missing some more context

  • By xerox13ster 2025-02-2723:108 reply

    Good!!! I just finished porting my number off of T-Mobile since I canceled my service with them mid-Superbowl when I learned they were collaborating with StarLink; I don't want to support a man advocating for my erasure because he's mad at his daughter for disowning him. I made it explicitly clear why I was cancelling, citing Elon and StarLink by name.

    Glad to see others participating in the "free" market and "voting with our wallets" before that ends up being the only way we can vote. Even more glad Slim is costing him billions compared to my pennies.

    • By marcuschong 2025-02-2723:526 reply

      It would be amazing if Elon became recognized as the toxic figure that he is, and that had real economic impact on his companies.

      • By marcuschong 2025-02-2723:551 reply

        I do wonder though, when I see so many famous people on Joe Rogan, for example, if the world isn't pass that somehow. Remember Neil Young as the absolutely solitary voice trying to pressure Spotify? It doesn't matter if you think Rogan should be boycotted; there are people that clearly should be doing it, to be honest with their own values, but aren't.

        Edit: small correction.

        • By saturn8601 2025-02-281:35

          Since Trump started his term, Rogan has fallen from the top podcast in the charts to number two with a 32% drop in downloads over the past month. I guess its something?

      • By ta1243 2025-02-280:54

        https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgd9v3r69qo

        > Shares in electric car maker Tesla have slumped more than 9% after EU and UK sales fell by almost half in January.

      • By rsynnott 2025-02-288:40

        That _may_ be happening, with fairly dramatic Tesla sales declines in Europe, though that also might just be competition.

      • By hn_throwaway_99 2025-02-280:001 reply

        Well, there's a lot in the news today about the FAA cancelling a 2.4 billion dollar contract with Verizon and awarding it to Starlink.

        So look like Musk may have gotten a good deal with the couple hundred million he spent to help get Trump elected.

      • By LanceJones 2025-02-2723:563 reply

        [flagged]

        • By Larrikin 2025-02-280:53

          Lots of people wish for the failures of profitable businesses. The sooner the better for us to be off oil the better for the planet. The slave trade employed many people and was extremely profitable. There's no reason to care about Starlink being successful.

        • By AngryData 2025-02-281:18

          Why not? The entire point of market economics is to make that not a problem and leave room for other potentially better companies to take the place of worse ones. He obviously is a negative influence for the business as a whole even if he stayed out of politics, just the fact that he tries to pull so much money/value out of those businesses for personal gain has a negative effect on how efficient and beneficial to consumers those businesses can be.

        • By jxjnskkzxxhx 2025-02-281:52

          Yes, I do. More important than tech and jobs is that we keep too much power from accumulating in any one persons hands.

      • By roenxi 2025-02-281:012 reply

        > In 1938, Ford was awarded Nazi Germany's Grand Cross of the German Eagle, a medal given to foreigners sympathetic to Nazism

        ~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Ford#Honors_and_recognit...

        By US standards, Musk is pretty good. And I doubt there'll be any economic consequences for him no matter what ideologies he holds. The literal next line on Wikipedia is "The United States Postal Service honored Ford with a Prominent Americans series (1965–1978) 12¢ postage stamp".

        • By _DeadFred_ 2025-02-2819:57

          I'm not going to research historical Nazi's to try and what, understand???, why current day nazi's aren't so bad. Fuck all Nazi's.

        • By insane_dreamer 2025-02-286:01

          Actually before WW2 many Americans were somewhat sympathetic to the Nazis; Hitler didn't seem so bad until he started invading other countries and stepped up his persecution of the Jews and Roma in 1938. Other recipients of that award were Charles Lindburgh and the chairman of IBM.

    • By all2 2025-02-2723:382 reply

      Curious about what this is about. I don't pay very close attention to the news cycle.

      • By ziddoap 2025-02-2723:421 reply

        I assume they are referring to this partnership:

        https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-starlink-beta...

        "T-Mobile (NASDAQ: TMUS) introduced the next big thing in wireless — T-Mobile Starlink — to tens of millions of football fans. Now in public beta, this breakthrough service, developed in partnership with Starlink [...]"

        • By all2 2025-02-281:271 reply

          I got that part. It was the "wants to eliminate my people" part I'm missing. Is Musk talking genocide?

            • By all2 2025-02-286:55

              Ah, yeah, he's making the 'this is mental illness' argument that has been a mainstay in psychology for the last century or so.

              Mainstream acceptance was slow up until the last 10 years or so.

              I doubt he'll succeed in his efforts. I don't think he cares as much as the people he's targeting care.

      • By bainganbharta 2025-02-2723:432 reply

        [flagged]

        • By alwa 2025-02-2723:532 reply

          I have yet to meet a person who regrets having successfully weaned themselves off the news-cycle dopamine treadmill. If anything, I find that they tend to be better informed and more thoughtful than they were when they wasted cycles on the carnival.

          Might just be me though.

          • By yongjik 2025-02-280:114 reply

            Well that's a bit of conceptual selection bias, isn't it? Good for their mental health, but you cannot regret something if you don't know what you're missing.

            There must have been 1930s Europeans who checked out of all those news about Hitler, after all. Must have been much better for their peace of mind, until one day suddenly it wasn't.

            • By throwaway-blaze 2025-02-281:26

              The rise of Hitler was noticed and minimized by even the most plugged-in governments and leaders. The UK was led by a chap who thought he could mollify him by just giving him parts of Central Europe. You can call Chamberlain many names but "uninformed" isn't one.

              I like the description earlier in the thread of "the carnival". You can leave at any time and your life and dopamine will be the better for it.

            • By lesuorac 2025-02-280:15

              The thing is the Nazi's didn't come out of nowhere.

              If you check the news once a week or once a minute you'll still notice them.

            • By cruffle_duffle 2025-02-283:29

              lol. Because I’m sure all the news was posting anything critical about the nazi party at all. Look at now the vast majority of the mainstream news handled Covid. Absolutely zero intellectual curiosity or actual honest insight and 100% pure grade-a government propaganda. Not even a shred of actual investigation or thought. They were nothing more than a mouthpiece for whatever nonsense the government spewed out.

          • By fragmede 2025-02-280:071 reply

            While I encourage everyone to opt out of the sensationalized news cycle and prioritize their own mental health, people who aren't paying attention aren't better informed, because the news is actively being censored by their billionaire owners, so it takes a lot of effort to be fully informed, and no, remembering a few things they heard off of Joe Rogan doesn't make them well informed.

            • By wizzwizz4 2025-02-281:041 reply

              Ea-nāṣir sold me poor-quality copper. I need high-quality copper. Therefore, I will buy loads of copper from Ea-nāṣir, and sift through it until I find high-quality copper.

              • By fragmede 2025-02-282:23

                The copper market sold me copper, some of which was low quality, some of which was high quality. But instead of continuing to shop at the whole market and developing any sense of what is quality, I've decided to go exclusively to Joe's Best Copper. He tells me his stuff is the best. I don't go to anyone else now so I have no way of comparing it to anything else. Anyway, there's no possible way he could be lying to me, I'm way too smart for than.

        • By cruffle_duffle 2025-02-283:261 reply

          Nope. It’s the best decision you’ll ever make. It’s pure propaganda that has absolutely no positive impact at all.

          • By AlecSchueler 2025-02-288:241 reply

            So many here are in agreement that queer erasure is occurring you're saying that being informed about it happening can have no positive impact at all? How should we fight against something if we ignore that it is even happening?

            • By wizzwizz4 2025-03-0312:48

              Have you seen this discussed in the news? I haven't.

    • By diego_sandoval 2025-02-280:082 reply

      > a man advocating for my erasure

      What do you mean?

      • By tills13 2025-02-281:12

        Maybe OP is trans

      • By chmorgan_ 2025-02-280:141 reply

        [flagged]

        • By spankalee 2025-02-280:162 reply

          What are you even talking about? Trying to rule that trans people don't exist and kick them out of every space possible is one of the biggest efforts of Trump's first month.

    • By rayiner 2025-02-2723:372 reply

      [flagged]

      • By jfaulken 2025-02-2723:463 reply

        Politics, I know, but: I guess he just missed the part where Slim is dismantling his country for profit. Oh yeah and literally a Nazi.

        • By ziddoap 2025-02-2723:50

          >dismantling his country for profit

          Wow, that certainly sounds familiar.

        • By tdeck 2025-02-2723:49

          These seem like more reasons to celebrate the end of a partnership between two oligarchs. May it cost them both money in the end.

        • By rayiner 2025-02-2723:57

          Profoundly inverted sense of morality. Don’t know what can be done about it.

      • By daveguy 2025-02-2723:481 reply

        elon lost a contract. At this point most people consider that a good thing, since he is trying to sow chaos in the US government for little to no benefit to the US or anywhere else except his wallet. And he is enabling the little dictator.

        That doesn't mean you support the person who pulled the contract.

        You can scream MDS all you want. Most people are done with the meme garbage.

        • By rayiner 2025-02-280:012 reply

          [flagged]

          • By anigbrowl 2025-02-281:031 reply

            Top shelf question-begging there, counselor.

            • By rayiner 2025-02-282:061 reply

              [flagged]

              • By anigbrowl 2025-02-287:361 reply

                Civil servants don't vote for the party that constantly lies about and shits on them? Astonishing.

                Nor was I aware that the ABA was part of the government. It's this sort of high quality analysis that keeps me coming back to HN.

                • By daveguy 2025-02-2814:21

                  Thinking that everyone in a federal job or benefitting from those big bad grants are all in one party is some massive ignorance that takes a lot of brainwashing on right wing media to accomplish. They won't understand until it affects someone they know. By then musk will have diverted a lot of spending to his own companies with the doge fraud.

    • By spankalee 2025-02-280:21

      [flagged]

    • By LanceJones 2025-02-2723:58

      [flagged]

    • By huang_chung 2025-02-280:062 reply

      [flagged]

      • By fragmede 2025-02-280:101 reply

        not sure why you read "irrational ragequit" into it. Calmly telling the CSA, who may or may not be in the Philippines, what to note down as cancellation reason: Other - Elon Musk, gets stuffed into a database and then bubbles up in internal reports on a pie chart of reasons so if enough other people also cite that reason, it becomes seen.

        • By huang_chung 2025-02-280:14

          This is why, OP said mid-superBowl:

          > T-Mobile since I canceled my service with them mid-Superbowl when I learned they were collaborating with StarLink

          That implies spur of the moment, emotional response.

          You are watching the Super Bowl one minute, you see a commercial for T-Mobile, then immediately call to cancel your service in anger? If it happened at all - you must port before cancelling, or lose the number

    • By blastonico 2025-02-2723:161 reply

      [flagged]

      • By xerox13ster 2025-02-2723:21

        They're gonna come for me anyway. Better than my communications going through his network. Maybe if enough people cite his behavior when cancelling T-Mobile will back off working with him, and he'll lose even more money.

  • By insane_dreamer 2025-02-2723:421 reply

    Looks like Elon's tweet may have been retaliatory, in response to Slim's decision not to continue business with Starlink (but build out more land-based networks), rather than prompting Slim's decision (though it no doubt solidified it).

    See https://expansion.mx/tecnologia/2025/02/26/america-movil-cor... (Spanish)

    • By adfm 2025-02-280:04

      Terrestrial networks have their issues, but they don't have to continuously launch. Curious to know which is better for the environment.

HackerNews