Oregon gave homeless youth $1k/month with no strings

2026-02-0120:0477101www.oregonlive.com

The program helped 94% of participants secure housing while building financial literacy skills that could break the cycle of homelessness.

Direct cash assistance from the state is helping homeless Oregon youth find housing, according to the results of a pilot program that concluded last year.

In February 2023, the Youth Experiencing Homelessness Program at the Oregon Department of Human Services began providing 120 youth in Multnomah, Clackamas and Deschutes counties ages 18-24 experiencing homelessness with $1,000 monthly until January 2025.

By the end of the two-year period, 94% of participants reported they were housed. Many also reported that they had improved their financial literacy skills, such as learning how to budget and build credit — skills that allowed them to leave unsafe or unstable situations.

The results of the pilot Direct Cash Transfer Plus program are encouraging and a worthwhile investment, said Matthew Rasmussen, program manager for the Youth Experiencing Homelessness Program.

“If somebody is really wanting to explore how to slow and end chronic homelessness among adults, then we need to do something to stop young people from entering it,” Rasmussen said.

Young adults aged 18 to 24 experience the highest poverty rates of any age group, according to research from the University of California, Berkley. In 2024, Oregon had the second highest rate of unsheltered unaccompanied youth in the country, according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Based on responses from about half of the program’s participants, 80% of participants became homeless because of a family disruption. Forty-three percent said they had experienced physical abuse by a partner and 71% said they had experienced violence of some kind.

The program prioritized underrepresented populations. That includes young parents, who made up 43% of participants by the end of the period. Forty-six percent of participants also reported they had experience in the foster care and justice system.

More than half of participants were women, while 30% were male and 18% identified as transgender or gender inclusive.

Gabrielle Huffman, a Bend resident, said the program helped her move into a place where she could heal, grow and plan for a sustainable future.

“Just one year after completing (the program), I’m in my own place, halfway through a business degree, focused on building a stable, secure foundation for my daughter and myself, and working toward becoming a nonprofit leader who supports her community.”

To participate, the youth regularly met with case managers. They also had access to a one-time $3,000 enrichment fund during the two years, which helped them pay not just for housing, but for school expenses, car purchases and to build savings.

Oregon is the second of its kind in the nation to implement the direct cash transfer program after New York City. Funded through the Oregon Department of Human Services, the goal of the program is to let youth choose how to spend their money and empower them to make investments in their own well-being.

“Oregon’s results confirm what we saw in New York: When you cover the real cost of shared housing directly for two years — and pair it with support — young people stay housed,” said Larry Cohen, the cofounder and executive director at Point Source Youth, an organization that provided technical assistance to Oregon as it implemented the program. “This isn’t complicated. Stability takes time, and flexible cash gives young people the breathing room to build it.”

The direct cash transfer program is already underway for a second cohort. Payments began in September and have expanded to Jackson County. Funding for the latest round includes $240,000 worth in legislative appropriations and a $1 million grant from nonprofit Oregon Community Foundation.

-- Mia Maldonado, Oregon Capital Chronicle

The Oregon Capital Chronicle, founded in 2021, is a nonprofit news organization that focuses on Oregon state government, politics and policy.


Read the original article

Comments

  • By threethirtytwo 2026-02-0120:548 reply

    > More than half of participants were women, while 30% were male and 18% identified as transgender or gender inclusive.

    Why were the ratios not representative of actual homeless demographics? Most homeless people are biological men by an overwhelming majority.

    Maybe transgendered people and women seek more help? Or the people conducting this study were biased themselves? As a result, I don’t think the results universally say something about homelessness.

    • By luafox 2026-02-0121:151 reply

      From the article: > The program prioritized underrepresented populations. That includes young parents, who made up 43% of participants by the end of the period.

      Homeless parents are almost always women with very few exceptions. Now, in my personal opinion, "underrepresented populations" in this kind of environment refers to people who are at greater immediate risk while homeless, which obviously include women & genderqueer people, as well as those who are young+single parents or are disabled.

      Find and read the actual full report for more details though.

      • By threethirtytwo 2026-02-0123:564 reply

        >The program prioritized underrepresented populations.

        Do you know why they did this? Transgenderism or being a woman is an orthogonal concept to homelessness. Whatever demographic you're in, if you are homeless, you are suffering and I assume are exposed to the same gender neutral dangers that arise from being homeless.

        What exactly is the greater danger that would need such prioritization?

        • By pseudalopex 2026-02-021:291 reply

          They said parents received priority. Homeless people whose children live with them are women mostly. Giving parents priority aided their children.

          The report said the programs prioritized groups that are overrepresented in national youth homelessness counts, including LGBTQ+ and BIPOC youth, as well as those who were pregnant or parenting status, formerly incarcerated, undocumented, or had a history of domestic violence or trafficking, populations that are continually overrepresented in national youth homelessness counts.[1] Underrepresented was the journalist's description seemingly.

          Some dangers to homeless people are gender neutral. Some are not. Sexual assault is not. But the portions of the report I read did not say immediate danger was considered.

          Being transgender is a more polite way to describe being transgender.

          [1] https://static1.squarespace.com/static/60418acae851e139836c6...

        • By thompsonparker 2026-02-021:24

          Also, transgender people are more likely to experience violence on the streets.

        • By Kuraj 2026-02-020:072 reply

          Queer people are at a greater risk of being estranged from their families, if nothing else.

          • By threethirtytwo 2026-02-021:243 reply

            Aren't all homeless people estranged from families?

            I assume family would help if it was a possibility.

            • By pseudalopex 2026-02-022:09

              Someone unable or unwilling to house a family member could be able and willing to pay their phone service. Someone unable to pay their phone service could be willing to talk to them.

              Homeless young people are disproportionately LGBT because of family rejection.

            • By IAmBroom 2026-02-028:001 reply

              That's a gigantic, optimistic assumption.

              Don't assume. Your life is nothing like theirs. You have no idea what it's like. I know some of them; I have no idea what they face on the daily.

              Not fearing being kicked in the middle of the night while you sleep is part of the privilege that keeps you from understanding what they live in.

              • By threethirtytwo 2026-02-0220:24

                How is my assumption optimistic? I assumed all homeless people are estranged from families. That is a pessimistic assumption. It’s bad for everyone.

                What are you meaning here?

            • By D-Coder 2026-02-022:52

              If they have a family.

          • By pseudocomposer 2026-02-020:12

            I guess the flipside of this is, do we want poor/homeless people from groups our society dubs “overrepresented” to only be able to find help from organizations that specifically serve selected “overrepresented” groups? Are there no obvious bad sides to that?

            Because you can’t really have the one without the other.

        • By locopati 2026-02-037:24

          transgenderism is not a thing. transgender people are real, however.

          trans people are at greater risk of violence and sexual assault (sometimes because sex work is the only way for them to survive). being arrested as a trans woman could mean being placed in a jail/prison with cis men, again, putting them at greater risk of violence and sexual assault.

    • By duskwuff 2026-02-0121:071 reply

      This program specifically targeted homeless youth; it seems plausible that the demographics of that segment might differ from the larger community.

      • By threethirtytwo 2026-02-0123:572 reply

        This makes sense, targeting youth likely has a higher chance of a better outcome?

        • By kayfox 2026-02-022:181 reply

          From my experiences, it does have a higher chance of better outcome, as homeless youth are usually homeless because of some family issue and not because they are unable to hold down a job as a result of drug abuse or being homeless.

          • By apothegm 2026-02-0210:50

            Yup. And the longer they’re homeless the higher the likelihood that they do develop health or drug problems and shift from being relatively easy to relatively difficult to get back on their feet.

            Plus, homeless youth can include kids as young as 14 or 15, who are especially vulnerable to predators on the street.

        • By pseudalopex 2026-02-022:30

          There are reasons targeting youth could be more effective. But a more direct reason this project targeted youth was Oregon's homeless youth program designed it.

    • By jmalicki 2026-02-022:16

      Something noone else has said here, and I don't know the degree to which it is true for this study, but good study design generally includes stratified sampling.

      e.g. if there are subpopulations whose experience differs a lot, you want to have those populations overrepresented in your study to reduce variance of study.

      This is basic statistics.

    • By 3rodents 2026-02-0121:08

      it’s a youth program ran by a youth organization. Young people dealing with family problems due to gender identity, sexuality etc. are a very large portion of homeless youth. I would guess transgender people are underrepresented at just 18%.

    • By bandrami 2026-02-0121:07

      Probably because homeless women are more likely than homeless men to access social services, which means they're where the program directors can find them?

    • By kayfox 2026-02-022:14

      Your comparing statistics for homeless adults to homeless youth.

      From my experience being a homeless youth 20 years ago, LGBTQ individuals make up a large share of homeless youth, I would guess more than 50% at the time.

      There may be less gay or lesbian homeless youth these days, but transgender youth may have grown.

    • By gamblor956 2026-02-020:081 reply

      True, but most straight male homeless individuals are homeless because of substance abuse, so giving them money doesn't address the cause of their homelessness in any way.

      The targeted populations were primarily homeless for economic reasons, so the point of the experiment was to demonstrate that the simplest/most efficient solution was just to give them some money.

      • By pseudalopex 2026-02-020:201 reply

        > most straight male homeless individuals are homeless because of substance abuse

        Do you have a citation for this?

        • By gamblor956 2026-02-022:551 reply

          You're welcome to walk yourself down to Skid Row or your nearest homeless camp and conduct a detailed survey if you want the specifics. Or, a simple Google search will provide several studies including demographic details.

          • By pseudalopex 2026-02-0215:571 reply

            > You're welcome to walk yourself down to Skid Row or your nearest homeless camp and conduct a detailed survey if you want the specifics.

            What country is the subject of this discussion? I assumed the US because the article was about Oregon. Most homeless people in the US do not live in camps.[1]

            > Or, a simple Google search will provide several studies including demographic details.

            Simple searches found researchers couldn't agree how many homeless people used drugs. Never mind abused. Never mind abused before becoming homeless. Never mind became homeless because they abused drugs.

            Simple searches found citations for the claim substance abused caused most homelessness failed to support the claim. A survey cited frequently asked mayors what they thought were the top causes of homelessness in their cities.

            Simple searches found studies which said homelessness was economic primarily.

            [1] https://aibm.org/research/homelessness-in-the-united-states/

            • By gamblor956 2026-02-095:22

              There are two very different types of homeless. The invisible homeless are the ones who are homeless for economic reasons; they live in RVs, cars, or shelters and generally try to hide their homelessness. They rarely use drugs or alcohol.

              The visible homeless are heavy drug users. In LA, over 90% of the visible homeless are drug addicts. The same is true in San Diego and the SF Bay Area. In LA, LAHSA likes to goose the statistics to to include the economic homeless, but the economic homeless don't use LAHSA's services because LAHSA exclusively services the drug users (because their funding is based on long term placements, which the economic homeless do not need).

    • By insane_dreamer 2026-02-0217:34

      It was a small pilot (120 people) -- given the number of homeless in Portland alone, it wouldn't be difficult to find 60 who were women even if women make up a smallish percentage of overall homeless.

  • By tbrownaw 2026-02-0121:23

    > Based on responses from about half of the program’s participants

    That "responses" is a link to the actual report.

    1. The program was 120 people. 80 did an initial survey, 80 did a final survey, and there was an overlap is 60 who did both surveys. The survey was offered to all participants.

    So, this is not a random / representative sample.

    2. The program also included counseling sessions.

    So, there's the potential for different results for money without counseling, or counseling without money.

    3. I don't see any comparison to a control group.

    For example, it's well known that homelessness is usually transitory. Without a control group, there's nothing to identify what was caused by the program vs being caused by the usual course of things.

  • By luafox 2026-02-0121:081 reply

    Consider reading the full final report here: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/60418acae851e139836c6...

    Contains significantly more information and exact statistics.

    • By 3rodents 2026-02-0121:28

      Unfortunately it looks like the headline numbers may not be representative:

      “The research team did not initially receive a complete participant contact list and the CBO staff led in facilitating recruitment, resulting in a sample that does not represent all DCT+ participants. The limited sample size further limits the representativeness and generalizability of findings. The evaluation sample of 63 participants represents only 54% of the total 117 program participants. Therefore, the study population may not adequately represent the broader DCT+ experience. Additionally, participants who completed both initial and exit surveys may differ systematically from those who did not, potentially skewing results toward more positive outcomes among individuals who remained engaged throughout the evaluation period.”

HackerNews