To quote another HN comment recently made:

> Using AI to write content is seen so harshly because it violates the previously held social contract that it takes more effort to write messages than to read messages. If a person goes through the trouble of thinking out and writing an argument or message, then reading is a sufficient donation of time.

However, with the recent chat based AI models, this agreement has been turned around. It is now easier to get a written message than to read it. Reading it now takes more effort. If a person is not going to take the time to express messages based on their own thoughts, then they do not have sufficient respect for the reader, and their comments can be dismissed for that reason.

So put cameras everywhere? What a privacy nightmare.

Foreign drones surveilled a military base here and they didn't shoot any down.

Maybe the US reacts differently, but in Europe most military bases have been scouted by Russian drones, and afaik none were shot down.

> To highlight that point, the US cares enough to investigate and discover just how such an unfortunate act happened.

I trust the US as much as Iran or North Korea to investigate themselves and find no fault.

It is effective if there are cameras everywhere, meaning you are tracked and spied on everywhere you go.

I'd prefer we spend a bit more on the road infrastructure than live in a surveillance hell.