[flagged]

> I assumed, like President said, that it will be China, not me, who pays the tariffs.

Why would they pay a tax that's levied by the US government? In both the most literal sense, and in the sense of keeping their prices the same.

AI bros sound like NFT bros.

> Reading through these commits sparked an idea: what if we treated prompts as the actual source code? Imagine version control systems where you commit the prompts used to generate features rather than the resulting implementation.

Please god, no, never do this. For one thing, why would you not commit the generated source code when storage is essentially free? That seems insane for multiple reasons.

> When models inevitably improve, you could connect the latest version and regenerate the entire codebase with enhanced capability.

How would you know if the code was better or worse if it was never committed? How do you audit for security vulnerabilities or debug with no source code?

Lots of things have been discovered by guess-and-check, but it's a shit method for problem solving. You wouldn't use guess-and-check unless A) you don't know enough about the problem to employ a better method or B) the problem space can be searched quickly enough that using a better method doesn't really matter.