If they had a big result like, native 1.58-bit quality clearly matches top peers, they would be saying that prominently in the repo.

The engineering/optimization work is nice, but this is not what people have been waiting for, as much as, can’t the Bitnet idea that seemed promise really deliver in a competitive way.

“Cursor has to pay Anthropic's retail API prices (or close to it) for access to Opus 4.6. So to provide a Claude Code-equivalent experience using Opus 4.6, it would cost Cursor ~$5,000 per power user per month. But it would cost Anthropic perhaps $500 max.”

Cursor seems to be in a tough spot. Just heard the swix podcast on their big new cloud agents thing, and it’s looking like a pretty small moat these days.

Yes. Is there a basic chat app for iOS that prioritizes full intelligence over full duplex?

Agree ChatGpt advanced voice mode is so bad for quality of the actual responses. Old model, no reasoning, little tool use.

I just want hands free conversations with SOTA models and don’t care if I have to wait a couple of seconds for a reply.

Opus 4.6 was getting this wrong only last week.

Nice work.

I think you should remove Claude as a contributor to your repo. It probably weaseled its way in on its own, I think it’s the developers job to talk about the tools they used not the tool company.