From the article, verbatim:

> We're not giving up. Digg isn't going away.

Post title is misleading.

The question that comes to mind for me after reading your comment is how can a question about a game require that much context?

I laughed out loud when the author wrote 'it replaced nano'.

So you are claiming to have tried dozens of editors, discarded them, only to land on nano as your daily driver?

If that's true, this person must be a character.