I know this might sound naive but for those of us who had to google

kvm here mean keyboard video and mouse, not the linux kernel-based virtual machine kvm

this device apparently is used to connect to machines remotely over IP

Clearly this project failed for either

  1. scaling for a very specific use case, or because
  2. it hasn't even found product-market fit 

I think, that complexity cannot be eliminated, but it can be hidden and distributed, using the right abstraction

that being said C++ being a big language adds complexity (stemming from the language itself, i.e. stemming from the tool)

So you can use a complex tool, to make a complex task simple, or a simple tool and keep the task more complex, requiring more steps etc..

But with C++ its a complex tools, that while it takes some complexity from the task, I think it adds enough complexity, that could outweigh the complexity it reduces

We need better languages, C++ is not it

Raku is now a completely separate language from Perl and I think that while Perl still seem to be used, Raku usage is even smaller

I am really impressed of how Raku developers keep their motivation to work on it

And I am a bit curious to know if Proxmox is interested in Raku at all, or are they only using Perl

i was rephrasing , saying what i understood (thinking i was making it clearer)

you are suggesting, i misunderstood the original text , if that is true i blame the original of being obfuscated