State of the Windows: What is going on with Windows 11?

2026-01-2622:03136198ntdotdev.wordpress.com

Hi! Long time no see, huh? :) It’s been three years since my last State of the Windows article, which was about the inconsistencies in the Windows 11 user experience. Since then, Microsoft (a…

Hi! Long time no see, huh? 🙂

It’s been three years since my last State of the Windows article, which was about the inconsistencies in the Windows 11 user experience. Since then, Microsoft (and the world as a whole to be quite honest) has gotten through a lot of changes, especially since the introduction of OpenAI’s ChatGPT, and in our case, most importantly, Microsoft Copilot.

Until a few years ago, Windows was Microsoft’s crown jewel (or as they said in the Windows 7 commercial, the heartbeat of Microsoft), an impressive operating system that had the purpose to be a common platform for all devices. However, since the launch of Windows 11, which at first had the purpose to somewhat modernize the look and feel of the OS, it seems that priorities have changed quite a bit.

Today we are going to talk about the perceived drop of quality in Windows, from fundamental issues like critical bugs and incidents from the last 3 years to how everything’s become a Copilot upsell funnel mechanism.

So, without further ado, let’s go!

First, let’s talk about the current, show-stopping errors that appeared with the latest January 2026 update, and how to fix them.

This is one of the bugs that I’ve actually encountered a few days ago at work – people would come in saying that their PCs would either act unresponsive after shutting down (as in, they wouldn’t start up again the next day), or it would reboot immediately after shutting down.

This issue was introduced with the January 2026 update, KB5073455 and it is more prominent on newer platforms, especially Intel’s Meteor Lake and Arrow Lake.

Reportedly this issue is caused by the System Guard Secure Launch, a virtualization-based security component which, as the name implies, protects the boot process by using DRTM, or Dynamic Root of Trust for Measurement.

More information about this technology can be found here.

Since last Patch Tuesday, Microsoft released a patch for this issue, KB5077797, which seems to solve the issues.

As a temporary workaround, users can shutdown their PCs using the Command Prompt, by entering shutdown /s /t 0. But this begs the question, why does the shutdown command work through this command which supposedly does the same thing, but not through the classic shutdown button?

Once again, this month’s Patch Tuesday brought another major issue, which has the potential to affect one’s productivity in a big way.

If the KB5074109 is installed, applications can become unresponsive when accessing PST files stored on cloud storage. To put it simply, if you have your mail archive saved on OneDrive or Dropbox and are still using the classic Win32 Outlook (and not the WebView based one) it’s possible that you can’t access the file, since the application would become unresponsive.

Also, users with Outlook POP account profiles and profiles with PST files report that Outlook hangs and does not exit properly.

Up until yesterday, the only fixes were to either uninstall the update or to “use webmail”. Their words, not mine.

However, as of January 25th, Microsoft released the KB5078132 update, which should fix the issue.

Some other issues with the latest update include:

Apps that wouldn’t load (including system ones like Notepad), crashing with the error 0x803f8001.

Unbootable volumes – the infamous 0x7f BSOD which means that it can’t mount the disk partition to continue booting.

These are the most glaring issues that were introduced with the latest Windows update.

Since the introduction of 24H2, Microsoft had a scandal related to Windows almost every month.

Some of the most critical ones include:

WinRE wouldn’t recognize keyboard and mouse input after the October 2025 update

Task Manager wouldn’t close completely if KB5067036 was installed, meaning that whenever one opened a new taskmgr window a new instance would be launched.

RDP failures with 24H2/25H2 – once again, this is actually a critical issue that I’ve also encountered at work, and because of it we had to rollback a few PCs to 23H2 in order to have stable RDP connections.

Various devices like DACs or webcams not working after installing updates.

DRM video issues with the September 2025 update

Unfortunately, these are only some of the more prominent issues that occurred in the last year.

Another ever-growing issue is the fact that Windows is bloated. And I’m not talking about the number of apps that are included in the OS or something that any script or custom OS could fix, but the fact that critical components are becoming so heavy that Microsoft has to develop workarounds in order to make them feel faster.

The prime example is Windows Explorer, which has become so sluggish that it has to be preloaded in order to make it faster, but even then it’s actually slower than previous versions of Windows!

How can one of the core UI elements of the OS become so heavy while not offering any noticeable quality-of-life improvement (apart from the introduction of tabs in Windows 11 22H2)?

Even Windows updates have become insanely big. Just take a look at the latest January 2026 update for Windows 11 23H2 and the one for 25H2.

More than 4 times bigger! And you probably know why. More on that later.

Last, but not least, the technical debt of Windows has become almost unbearable. 30+ years of Windows NT certainly adds up. And the fact that Microsoft can’t focus on a visual language or a software platform for once is daunting, especially since given the nature of Windows you have to support them all.

However, the biggest problem is that Windows is not only buggy. Sure, a piece of software of this magnitude can and will have its fair share of issues. Our use cases have gotten more complex and the software that we expect to fulfill those use cases have become more complex, more secure, more powerful, you name it. That being said…

Let’s tackle the elephant in the room.

LLMs (and AI as a whole) have the potential to be an outright revolution, changing the fabric of society and the way of our lives. Microsoft Copilot as well could be a brilliant idea if it is implemented correctly and has the power to completely transform Microsoft into an even bigger juggernaut, unlocking even more of that sweet shareholder value… if it’s done properly, that is.

Introduced in 2023, Microsoft Copilot is Microsoft’s chatbot based on OpenAI’s models after a $10 billion investment. Introduced in Windows 11 with the December 2023 Patch Tuesday, at first it was just a benign WebView application that could be easily removed. However, since 2024, Copilot and artificial intelligence have taken a critical role in Microsoft’s overall strategy, especially in areas like programming.

This shift also showed up in subsequent versions of Windows.

In Windows 11 24H2, the main highlight of the new update was the introduction of a suite of AI features, with the most important being Windows Recall.

The flagship feature of 24H2, Recall was intended to a be a “photographic memory” of sorts for your PC. This meant that, as you might have guessed, Windows Recall would take a snapshot of your screen every few seconds. Then, the information from those screenshots would be processed using local AI to make it searchable.

However, soon after it was introduced it became clear that it was a security nightmare. Early security researchers discovered that the data was stored in a largely unencrypted SQLite database, making it a goldmine for info-stealing malware. Not only that, but the early builds of Recall had no option to disable it. The backlash was so severe that Microsoft was forced to pull the feature just days before the Copilot+ PC launch in 2024, leaving a new generation of PCs without their flagship feature.

Applications like Signal and Brave implemented anti-Recall features that would prevent the app from taking screenshots.

While Microsoft would mitigate the main security concerns related to Recall, by making it uninstallable, encrypting its database and making it usable only if Windows Hello was enabled, the damage was already done.

Also, Windows Recall is one of the main reasons why Windows updates are so big these days, as each Windows update also introduces updates to the AI models included with the OS, even though you may not even have a Copilot+ PC that supports these features.

Apart from Recall, Windows has also suffered from an acute Copilot-ification.

The preinstalled browser (Edge) has Copilot.

The main text editor (Notepad) has Copilot.

There is also a dedicated Copilot app which is preinstalled and non-removable (in most cases)

The main photo viewer has a Copilot button which just opens the main app

The Settings application has Copilot in its search function (which doesn’t even work properly).

The Search application has Copilot (which only opens up the Copilot app) and needs a COMPLETE overhaul in my opinion.

Paint has Copilot

Office has Copilot (which is one of the few instances where Copilot and AI as a whole is genuinely useful if used correctly)

Also, judging by the latest Windows 11 builds, even Windows Explorer, which is already quite heavy in itself as we discussed earlier is getting Copilot!

With the Copilot epidemic also came the complete death of the “offline” Windows.

Perhaps the most nagging change since 2023 is the slow death of the local account. Microsoft has spent the last three years systematically closing every “backdoor” that allowed users to set up Windows without a Microsoft Account.

Methods like OOBE.exe /bypassNRO or a@a.com as the email for the account have been “fixed”, meaning that it becomes harder and harder to use a local account with each subsequent update.

Looking back at the last three years, the “State of Windows” is one of extreme ambition built on a crumbling foundation. Microsoft is trying to build a futuristic AI skyscraper, but they are building it on top of a basement filled with 30-year-old technical debt and a ground floor that can’t even handle a shutdown command properly.

Unfortunately, the issue that plagued Windows since the dawn of time has only aggravated recently. Windows 11 is a mixture of old and new technologies that are glued together, with decades of legacy code that simply refuses to die (because if it did a lot of corporate costumers would complain, and whether we like it or not they are paying big cash for support to Microsoft).

Also, it tries to have a “modern” UI that unfortunately not only is inconsistent, but also it’s too heavy for its own good, being just a lipstick on a bloated old pig.

Last, but certainly not least, it is full of AI features that most people didn’t ask for, some are even actively feared (see Recall) and are also quite lacking in polish and usefulness.

I feel like a good analogy of the current situation with Windows is this picture which was shown in an internal presentation regarding the performance and reliability of pre-reset Longhorn

Until Microsoft stops treating Windows as an “AI innovation platform” of sorts and starts treating it as the stable, reliable tool it was always meant to be, the user experience will continue to feel like a battle between the person sitting at the desk and the company that built the desk.

Thank you for you attention.

Did you find this article interesting? Writing these deep dives (once every few years 😂) takes a lot of time (and caffeine).☕Also it would be nice if I would get a proper domain for this page.

[Support my work!]


Read the original article

Comments

  • By wewewedxfgdf 2026-01-2622:2513 reply

    State of Windows?

    It's so out of touch, people hate it.

    People want a simple, clean, minimal, consistent OS that does not have anyone's interests first except the user. Windows 11 is a very, very long way from this.

    Honestly Windows 95 is closer to ideal than Windows 11.

    The state of Windows is: disaster.

    • By Telaneo 2026-01-2622:343 reply

      The amount of research that went into making Windows 95 a user friendly OS is actually quite impressive. They didn't have all the kinks ironed out, and they couldn't foresee everything, but it's was a pretty solid effort.

      I wonder how much research went into Windows 11, or 10 or 8 for that matter, and to what ends that research was made.

      • By pentagrama 2026-01-270:11

        There actually is a concrete reference for the Windows 95 era research. Microsoft published detailed results from their usability work in the mid-90s, including task based testing with real users, error analysis, and iterative design changes.

        Article title: The Windows® 95 User Interface: A Case Study in Usability Engineering (1996)

        Link: https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/238386.238611

      • By ASalazarMX 2026-01-2719:12

        Windows 95 Plug and Play (now called Legacy Plug and Play, which brings a tear to my eye) was a marvelous engineering feat. If operating systems had kept improving at that pace, who knows what they'd be capable of today?

        These days Operating Systems (desktop and mobile) have mostly stagnated; even open source Unix derivatives are strongly committed to backwards compatibility, and have reached an island of mostly stability.

        I hope to see in the future something like Plan 9, who was an effort to reimagine what an OS could be. BeOS brought innovations, but those have become commonplace while Haiku still has growing pains.

        I yearn for weird again, but I don't have the skill set and resources to design/build a weird OS. Then again, standardization is good for progress, and I much prefer that the de facto standard is something free like Linux, and not proprietary Windows or MacOS. Standards should be public.

      • By itronitron 2026-01-274:58

        I've heard that MS took a different path (than previously) for the Windows 8 Metro design and wonder if a big source of the initial UI issues was a result of shoehorning the new design into the existing Windows UI.

    • By lateforwork 2026-01-2622:346 reply

      Fortunately for Microsoft, macOS 26 (Tahoe) is an even bigger disaster. Even John Gruber won't upgrade. So Microsoft is under no pressure at the moment.

      • By debo_ 2026-01-2622:43

        I use Linux for home and both Windows 11 and Tahoe for work. I personally find Windows 11 actively hostile while Tahoe is mostly just whatever. I'd much rather be using Tahoe.

      • By sharms 2026-01-271:46

        The complaints about Apple are from decades of excellent design and about a pixel being off or other small items that people with well trained eyes spot. The problems with Windows are forcing you to run Onedrive and then deleting your files

      • By jorts 2026-01-2623:351 reply

        I have been using Tahoe since it came out, and I really don't understand all the hate on it. Some of the aesthetics are a little off, but not burdensome. The only thing I really don't like is the large, rounded corners on windows.

        • By VerifiedReports 2026-01-272:49

          Fair or not, we could lump in application regressions that came along with Tahoe.

          One glaring example is Music, where the playback controls were moved from the top of the window (which is now empty space) to a "transparent" panel that overlaps the content in the browser. I mean... WTF.

      • By anvuong 2026-01-2623:48

        Tahoe UI sucks and is a dumpster fire but for the most parts it's still just normal MacOS. Windows 11 on the other hand actively hinders my productivity.

      • By raincole 2026-01-2622:384 reply

        You said that as if Linux desktop weren't a thing.

        ...and you're mostly right.

        • By xp84 2026-01-2623:331 reply

          Isn't Chrome OS "the Linux Desktop" for most non-developer people?

          90% of the people I know don't need any software that isn't either delivered via the Web, or limited for purely business reasons to an 'APP™' for mobile phones only.

          The remainder of the possible uses of a "computer" are mainly video editing and non-casual gaming.

          So if Windows and macOS continue to drag their reputations through the mud, Chrome OS, the Linux Desktop, is the most likely beneficiary.

          • By DrewADesign 2026-01-270:131 reply

            > The remainder of the possible uses of a "computer" are mainly video editing and non-casual gaming.

            You're overlooking a whole universe of business users. With the proliferation of tablets, smart TVs and phones, I'll bet many of those users ONLY user a computer at work. The vast majority of (mature) small-to-medium sized businesses lack the technical agility, expertise, time, money and/or initiative to switch from their existing legacy system of Windows file shares, outlook calendars, etc. and likely don't see a need to try. I'll bet most of those companies haven't even had a serious technical strategy conversation about the new ai features/changes in windows beyond "Phyllis in accounting discovered if you change setting X, then the stupid copilot thing won't get in the way when you're trying to run the TPS report macro." Even if they can do whatever they need to do in a browser, getting everybody in the company on board with the change and then figuring out what parts of their business break by doing so isn't something they generally feel compelled to investigate.

            I don't work in the software business anymore-- it's easy to forget that technical expertise isn't built-in to your workforce in the overwhelming majority of businesses, and most of them are way too ingrained in their procedures to jump ship to the latest SaaS solution that would do it 100x better once they figured it out.

            • By xp84 2026-01-270:52

              I don't think I disagree with you at all. Older businesses that have a significant investment in Windows-based, non-web-based applications will keep on keeping on, and it would take a lot of degradation of the platform to convince them to "modernize" (scare quotes because I don't actually think shiny web-based everything is automatically better than native Windows apps built for a certain niche purpose).

              That said, it's still a threat to Microsoft that no company founded today or in the last 5 years will have such a tight coupling to Windows on the Desktop, not even if the founding IT person is a big fan of Windows and deploys a Windows laptop to every desk. They may use Microsoft platforms, but things like Outlook, SharePoint and the tools a new company would subscribe to are perfectly usable on the Web for a large group of non-software-developer users. If one optimistically predicts that Apple sorts their stuff out, the Mac provides a non-web alternative to worry about too (as long as you don't need Excel to perform worth a damn!)

              Note: I deliberately drew a distinction with "on the Desktop" as I feel like things like Outlook, SharePoint, and especially Azure and what used to be called Active Directory, those things are still both popular and very sticky (hard to "just" migrate off of) even with brand new businesses. I suppose this is how Microsoft has hedged, since they could lose the desktop OS market and still do all right if they can keep businesses using those products. A Microsoft without Desktop Windows, looks to me kind of like Oracle.

        • By gylterud 2026-01-2622:552 reply

          Well, with the help of Microsoft and Apple, who knows? This might just be the years of the Linux desktop!

          Valve has made Linux gaming a thing. So, even normies are trying it…

          • By _carbyau_ 2026-01-270:191 reply

            I support your notion but my take is it will be a "slowly and then suddenly" thing.

            Do you declare "Year of the Linux Desktop" when market share is more than 50% or when the rate of conversion is 2%/month due to some market mechanism?

            • By pjmlp 2026-01-2712:521 reply

              I declare it will never go beyond WSL and Apple Virtualization Framework for normies, unless we have a second netbooks like wave with OEMs selling their pre-installed GNU/Linux distros on shops.

          • By pjmlp 2026-01-2712:50

            Thanks to a supply of games targeting Windows, developed by game studios only using Windows computers on their engineering team.

        • By DrewADesign 2026-01-2623:122 reply

          ::sigh:: Windows is an AI slop hellhole, and MacOS is way more interested in being flashy than being good. It should be Linux's time to shine as a general-audience desktop OS... but the usability just isn't there.

          As everyone points out when talking about Linux usability, it's fine for your grampa who just uses the email client and browser, but those users are switching to tablets, en masse, anyway. It's obviously fine for technically savvy users who are willing to deal with the periodic breakage or other hassle.

          Importantly, It's just a bad experience for users who require hardware, software or something else that tablets don't facilitate, but aren't interested in looking through stack overflow posts and reddit threads to see why the 6 year old tutorial for getting their video editing software to work doesn't apply to the distro they just installed because they couldn't figure out how to install their video card drivers on the other distro. And why does that program they used to use to control their firewall not change anything anymore (which to them just looks like the firewall doesn't work, so they can never research their way out of the problem?) And how do I [insert the bazillion other problems that are non-issues for people with the background knowledge, but for everyone else, frustrating, time-wasting brick walls that probably cost them more in lost billable time than multiple copies of Windows 11 Pro.]

          I've been using Linux since the 90s but I still don't use it for a lot of my media work. It's just too much of a PITA when I just need to satisfy my use case, which has nothing to do with the OS.

          Even the commercial distros like RHEL are just, comparatively... janky. I really wish it was easier to integrate more interface design expertise into FOSS development. The workflows are just super different. This is why commercial products have product managers that can objectively balance and coordinate the efforts between design and development. I think we've gotten to a point where more of the FOSS crowd sees the benefit of competent expert UI designers, but making that practically useful is a tough nut to crack.

          • By raincole 2026-01-2623:31

            At this point I think Linux's market share in desktop market will keep rising. But mostly due to Windows and MacOS users leaving desktop completely and becoming mobile-only in their private time.

            I also believe that's the future both Microsoft and Apple bet on. Otherwise they wouldn't have let their (once) flagship products became what they are now.

          • By jjaksic 2026-01-2717:08

            Have you tried Bazzite or Aurora? A well-made and full-featured atomic distro is basically as easy to use and as reliable as ChromeOS, but with most of the flexibility that Linux offers.

            I had Ubuntu for 8 years and it was as you describe (things broke all the time and every time I had to spend hours searching forums for arcane command lines etc). With Bazzite everything just works and nothing ever breaks. KDE with Wayland looks and feels amazing. I love love love the experience!

        • By caycep 2026-01-2623:21

          Hey wait...there are...er...dozens of us!

      • By yearolinuxdsktp 2026-01-270:371 reply

        Completely incomparable! It is not a bigger disaster. John Grubber is being an aesthetic stickler -— “comically sad icons”, “indiscriminate transparency” leading to things that are ugly, hard to grab-to-resize rounded window corners, icons in menus “ruining Mac’s signature menu system.”

        If you think that adding icons all over the place to menu items RUINS it, I think you’re either in a MacOS “purist stickler” category (which John Gruber is in), or you’re hyping things up for clicks. Because no sane person would call this ruining the menu system.

        And new icons “comically sad”? Someone call the whambulance. I saw the new icons, and they are fine. Sure, they are different. But I am not laughing and/or crying about them, and I bet most people don’t find them comically sad either.

        • By lateforwork 2026-01-271:23

          Mac is all about premium experiences. Not everyone cares about premium experiences, and that's okay! But those that do aren't going to settle for small degradations such as the ones you mention that in aggregate significantly downgrades the experience.

    • By btown 2026-01-2622:365 reply

      macOS (not iOS) used to be this. POSIX underpinnings. Iconography and visual language designed for clarity and simplicity. Balances between customizability and system stability with deactivatable gatekeepers.

      Now, the same way Windows serves Microsoft’s AI investments, Apple serves a nebulous corporate goal for inimitable (read: too unpredictable/unreliable for competitors to copy) Liquid [Gl]ass user interfaces at the expense of clarity, and launch speed at the expense of stability.

      I’m not sure if Steve Jobs would have complained about the market capitalization - but he certainly would have executed product improvements more cleanly.

      It’s not yet the year of Linux on desktop, I don’t think - but we get closer every year.

      • By loloquwowndueo 2026-01-2623:041 reply

        > It’s not yet the year of Linux on desktop, I don’t think - but we get closer every year.

        It is if you want it to be. For me it was 1996 - been doing great on Linux since then.

        • By xcf_seetan 2026-01-2711:46

          Wow, i thought it was just me, glad to to see i am not alone. I ditch windows in 1996 for Linux, never look back!

      • By setopt 2026-01-2622:59

        > It’s not yet the year of Linux on desktop, I don’t think - but we get closer every year.

        For me it is. I was already considering going back to Linux for a while, and MacOS Tahoe pushed me over the fence. Got a Thinkpad with Linux as a replacement for my MacBook some months ago and don’t regret it yet.

      • By baal80spam 2026-01-278:321 reply

        > It’s not yet the year of Linux on desktop

        Not for me. Coincidentally, I spent half a day yesterday with Gemini trying to install Linux Mint so that it dual boots with my Windows 10. Unfortunately - no matter what I did (and I tried a lot of things), the installer "couldn't locate an existing system installation" and warned me of losing access to my data should I continue.

        Now, I am using computers since 1980s, and I said "Nope, I don't have time for this". Now imagine a casual user trying to fight with GRUB.

        • By setopt 2026-01-2714:061 reply

          If you have Bitlocker on on windows you might have to disable it for dual boot installation to work (you can re-enable it later).

          • By baal80spam 2026-01-2714:45

            I don't have Bitlocker enabled.

      • By toshinoriyagi 2026-01-2721:26

        I swapped from Windows 11 to Linux in 2024 (Arch for a bit, NixOS for the last 1.5 years) and can never go back. Linux isn't perfect yet, but my experience is so much better now, and it will only improve. Windows seems to be regressing in many ways.

      • By VerifiedReports 2026-01-272:53

        Yeah, the regressions in Mac OS are particularly ill-timed and infuriating because there is no real competition now. I consider Windows unusable. It's not even worth talking about anymore; and I was a big Windows fan (and developer) into the 2000s. Now I don't have a single instance of Windows running in my house.

        If Apple's slide continues, computing will recede back to its hobbyist/academic roots, I guess.

    • By publicdebates 2026-01-2622:492 reply

      Windows 2000 was peak. All improvements from XP onwards were negligible.

      • By VerifiedReports 2026-01-272:54

        Improvements? Windows has suffered an ever-accelerating slide into the toilet, starting with Vista.

      • By nurettin 2026-01-2622:561 reply

        It was all downhill from 3.11

        • By touwer 2026-01-2623:051 reply

          That was the best. With sound drivers

          • By ahartmetz 2026-01-274:221 reply

            It crashed a lot. It's hard to imagine these days how often it crashed. Windows 2000 was peak for me. NT kernel, inofficial but very solid compatibility with pretty much everything DOS / Windows including games, and a clean, efficient UI.

    • By robertwt7 2026-01-2622:452 reply

      I always find some things that doesn't work with my PC on windows 11. Sometimes things as simple as moving files in explorer makes it hangs where I had to restart explorer.exe. This is embarrassing really that windows can't get this right. There are so many times where I was frustrated and wished that I can just use my macbook pro as my only workstation. I just wish that steam on linux has full support for most games that are it supports in windows then i'll make the switch

      my pc is not even that old, its ryzen 9 5900x with rtx 3080 and 32gb ram. however it is sluggish compared to my m1 pro macbook pro

      • By Telaneo 2026-01-2622:581 reply

        > I just wish that steam on linux has full support for most games that are it supports in windows then i'll make the switch

        That day is today (assuming you don't play games with kernel anti-cheat).

        • By subscribed 2026-01-270:561 reply

          I'm anxiously waiting for a slightly better Nvidia support. It'll either be Bazzite or CachyOS, it seems.

          Id rather have something mainstream, like Fedora i dislike but know its daemons better, but tough luck, it seem.

          Still, it's so fragmented. If I want a server, I have two families to chose from and two exactly solid choices. I'd I want a desktop for work - 2-4 solid choices.

          But desktop for gaming? Well, it's where "well, it depends" starts.

          • By Telaneo 2026-01-271:121 reply

            The fragmentation ain't great, but it's mostly just a hump at the start. Once you pick something, it's usually fine, and if it isn't, you learn that fairly quickly and switch to something else that is fine. After having tried one thing, you will have learned what needs you have and can rule out alternatives a lot more easily. Still, it would be nice to have one obvious solid choice, and then alternatives if you have specific needs.

            I'd imagine most people are waiting for SteamOS to become that one obvious solid choice, but Valve probably don't want to do that without Nvidia support not being the way it is today (and they probably don't want to do support either way, so they might never do it either way).

      • By bigyabai 2026-01-2622:47

        Steam on Linux is great. I'm playing Deadlock and Arc Raiders on my 3070 Ti without issue, highly recommend it if you're not playing FaceIts or Valorant.

    • By zeroonetwothree 2026-01-2622:487 reply

      Have you actually used Windows 95? It was awful. Crashed every four hours, driver hell, etc

      • By Someone1234 2026-01-2623:222 reply

        Windows 95 has some legitimate problem but one thing that was nice is that Microsoft (and Apple) were doing Skeuomorph, so training users to use it was a joy. It was designed to be easy to learn. Today they don't really care how users are trained, and just assume they'll figure it out.

        PS - Yes, Skeuomoric concepts age out, like Floppy Disk-Save Icons, but the concept still has merit. It can help "ground" the experience.

        • By VerifiedReports 2026-01-273:00

          They were not doing skeuomorphism. They were using simple visual clues, like "bevels" on buttons, to convey the existence of a control and its state. They weren't disguising controls as "paint" on "felt" on a gaming table, as Apple Game Center did at the peak of their cheesiness.

          The overreaction known as "flat" design (AKA no design) has fortunately started to recede. Still... some derelict "designers" are still deliver Advent calendars instead of usable applications.

        • By keyringlight 2026-01-2713:26

          I hate to think how much has been written on whether icons need to be updated because the picture isn't literal to the device it uses now, compared that link broken years ago and being more abstract representing a concept. I wonder if in a few years when some cars may be driven by hub motors will there be some moaning that the icon in an engine check light needs changing.

          There's so many options on what icons could be for the thing they represent you'll never please everyone, why is forwards a right facing arrow and backwards left facing? (Is this swapped for right-to-left languages?) Why not representing Z-depth away/forwards towards/back? What does reload have to do with rotation?

      • By Telaneo 2026-01-2623:03

        I have. Blame the drivers, not the OS. Vista wasn't great for the same reasons. Sure, Windows 11 mostly doesn't have driver problems, but that doesn't mean the OS is great. It's largely irrelevant to the point being made.

      • By jimjimjim 2026-01-2623:09

        It was unstable but it was nice to use. It introduced a lot of UI elements that are now taken for granted. I remember starting to build a window manager that replicated the win95 look.

      • By linguae 2026-01-2623:39

        I remember those days. Thankfully Windows NT 4.0 and Windows 2000 had a Windows 95/98-style desktop but used the rock-solid NT kernel. Unfortunately they were not marketed to home users.

        I feel similarly about the classic Mac OS: excellent interface and UI guidelines hampered by its cooperative multitasking and its lack of protected memory.

        Windows XP and Mac OS X were major blessings, bringing the NT kernel and Mach/BSD underpinnings, respectively, to home computing users.

      • By subscribed 2026-01-270:53

        I have. Also windows 98, Me (I loved it), NT 4.0, 2000, 2003 (as a workstation), XP, 7, (loved 7; skipped Vista, skipped 8), windows 10 is my last one.

        I really really liked windows 95. It rarely crashed on me even though I used and abused it extensively. It lived running smoothly, tolerated tinkering and uni files shenanigans.

        The i loved 7. To me it was a pinnacle. All comfort, no crap. Win 10 was less convenient (even if safer), and it was a constant struggle with the subversive, hostile vendor.

        Windows 95 is closer to the ideal, I agree with GP, although to me the closest is Windows 7 tbh.

      • By monkeydreams 2026-01-2623:09

        I was doing tech support through the Windows 95/98/ME period and it was hell. Everything either crashed the OS or required a restart if you touched it.

        When Windows 2000 rolled around and I saw how stable it was, I went out and bought it to put on my gaming PC. Another friend from work laughed at me and told me how terrible "Windows NT" was for running games until he saw how smooth Starcraft ran on it.

        Yeah, Windows 95/98/ME were terrible.

      • By VerifiedReports 2026-01-272:57

        Nonsense. And 98 was even better.

        This was back when you'd hook up a new printer or other device to a Windows computer, and it would detect it and prompt you for a driver disk. During that same era (and well past it, into the 2000s) if you plugged something into a Mac... nothing would happen. You had to go hunt down a driver for it and initiate the installation process yourself.

        How times have changed.

    • By timpera 2026-01-2622:275 reply

      I wouldn't be so certain of this. People on HN hate it for sure, but this is a bit of an echo chamber.

      • By Telaneo 2026-01-2622:311 reply

        Non-technical users aren't fans of random UI changes either. On the contrary, they hate having to re-learn shit every whatever-the-fuck years.

        • By Majromax 2026-01-270:362 reply

          Welcome to Hacker News 26! I know you're trying to read a comment now, but would you like to take a tour of new features?

          [ ] — Yes, I'd welcome a half-hour distraction from the thing I need to use the computer for right now!

          [ ] — No, I want to get my thing done now but then be confused about missing or new buttons at random intervals for the next six to eighteen months!

          • By Grisu_FTP 2026-01-277:27

            This is very unrealistic, it would say: [ ] — Yes, I'd love to!! [ ] — Not now - Please remind me in 5 minutes to do the important guided tour

          • By Telaneo 2026-01-271:13

            At least I can actually say no to this! Maybe I'll even not be reminded about it again in three days!

      • By graemep 2026-01-2622:29

        No,lots of people hate it. The biggest haters I know in real life are non technical users.

        However, they will continue to use it so MS does not need to worry about them.

      • By galleywest200 2026-01-2622:291 reply

        At least in the comment sections on tech/PC gaming YouTube people are frustrated with it there too.

        On the other hand YouTube tries to serve me content I want so maybe thats just the algo talking.

        • By keithnz 2026-01-2623:211 reply

          people tend to complain more than comment on being content. A fraction of a percent of windows user base is a lot of people. ( given around 500 million.... 1 percent is 5 million people ish, it would seem to me much much less than 5 million people are generally complaining)

          • By gnatman 2026-01-270:391 reply

            I think the Windows user base is substantially smaller than 500 billion.

      • By NoPicklez 2026-01-2622:51

        I don't have an issue with it and I started with 98. There are somethings I'd change, but I do feel like I read a lot of hyperbole.

        Provided I only largely use my PC for gaming.

      • By wewewedxfgdf 2026-01-2622:296 reply

        HN users are the global thought leaders and (hate the term) influencers in technology and what they think has massively outsized impact on the way the tech world works.

        • By tester756 2026-01-2622:37

          and other hilarious jokes we can tell ourselves :P

        • By tstrimple 2026-01-2622:58

          If that were the case, every single project would be hosted on Hetzner with a Postgres database and everyone would be running Linux desktops everywhere. It's not happening.

        • By FpUser 2026-01-2622:341 reply

          >"HN users are the global thought leaders and (hate the term) influencers"

          I've no idea about leaders as those do not write here much. As for "influencers" - my golden rule is to research subject I am having doubts about and pay zero attention to what so called "influencers" say.

          • By navigate8310 2026-01-2622:431 reply

            You'll never know if the person you abuse on HN is Sam or Cook, since they use alts to plant ideas or assess damage their misdeeds are causing.

        • By schmookeeg 2026-01-2622:42

          There's a fast-follow "You're absolutely right!" from Claude pending here. :)

        • By debo_ 2026-01-2622:44

          If this is a joke, it was a very good one.

        • By ulfw 2026-01-270:59

          God. The pretentiousness.

          Clearly leading something alright

    • By tonymet 2026-01-2719:34

      I mostly agree, but Windows XP was probably peak windows (Win 2k is my personal favorite)

      Windows 95 was a terrible operating system in the classic sense ( phony multi-tasking, no memory protection, no security protections whatsoever -- any process could ready any file or any piece of memory it wanted).

    • By nkrisc 2026-01-2623:55

      I think that I struggled much less with Window 95 as a child than I struggle with Windows 11 today, as I near 40.

    • By keithnz 2026-01-2623:001 reply

      what evidence do you have that people hate it? keeping in mind that a fraction of a percent of their user base is going to be a LOT of people so at any given time you can find a lot of people complaining.

      • By Telaneo 2026-01-2623:051 reply

        > Around 500 million PCs are holding off upgrading to Windows 11, says Dell.

        > “We have about 500 million of them capable of running Windows 11 that haven’t been upgraded,” said Dell COO Jeffrey Clarke on a Q3 earnings call earlier this week, referring to the overall PC market, not just Dell’s slice of machines.

        And that's ignoring the 500 million that can't upgrade due to TPM requirements or whatever.

        https://www.theverge.com/news/831364/dell-windows-11-upgrade...

        • By keithnz 2026-01-2623:122 reply

          what's that evidence of? it's also an estimate of all PCs that can upgrade, of 1.5 billion, 500 million still haven't upgraded. Certainly not evidence that people hate it. Many reasons why IT departments may not have upgraded things or why people haven't. In fact, the ones who haven't upgraded kind of are the people who are least likely to know about what windows 11 is like.

          • By Telaneo 2026-01-2623:321 reply

            Steam's Hardware survey still showed a 2/3 to 1/3 share of Windows 11 to Windows 10 two weeks before the support ended.[1] So about 1/3 of people who use Steam still weren't upgrading even though support was ending.

            It took about two and a half years for Windows 10 to overtake Windows 10 in usage (release in July 2015, overtook 7 in January 2018). It's taken more than 3 for Windows 11 (released October 2021, overtook 10 in June 2025), and it only did that with four and a bit months left until support for 10 ended (compared to 3 years for 7). And the number isn't consistently trending downwards for 10 anymore. It's a mess.[2]

            > Many reasons why IT departments may not have upgraded things

            Running an outdated OS which isn't getting security updates is against regulations in a lot of places. I'd imagine all the major corps were already done doing that by the time support actually ended.

            > In fact, the ones who haven't upgraded kind of are the people who are least likely to know about what windows 11 is like.

            And thus the most likely to be pushed to upgrade by Microslops lack of understanding of what consent is. They're just going to push the button that says 'Next' and have Windows 11 pushed onto them.

            [1] https://www.pcgamer.com/software/windows/a-bunch-of-steam-pl...

            [2] https://gs.statcounter.com/windows-version-market-share/desk...

          • By cgfjtynzdrfht 2026-01-2623:20

            [dead]

    • By caycep 2026-01-2622:29

      OP is certainly a metaphorical as well as a technical question

    • By throw10920 2026-01-275:05

      Can you provide a source for your claims about what users want?

      I think that hackers want a

      > simple, clean, minimal, consistent OS that does not have anyone's interests first except the user

      ...and those are things that I think are good and I want - but my interactions with normal people (which constitute the vast majority of Windows' userbase) consistently indicate that they have different priorities, such as cost, ease of use, familiarity, software compatibility, and a "modern" appearance (which often directly goes against actually good UX principles).

  • By asveikau 2026-01-2622:401 reply

    I was at Microsoft for a few years. I think some amount of blame has to go to hiring quality declining over the years.

    I wrote a bit about this in an old comment:

    > They have a lot of staff turnover too, and each generation of new SDE has less of a clue how the old stuff worked. So when they're tasked with replacing the old stuff, they don't understand what it does, and the rewrite ends up doing less.

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46472300

    Also, a little bit after I left, they eliminated the SDET role. I have memories of encountering many SDETs who didn't know what they were doing. But the good ones kept the developers honest. Getting rid of a parallel org structure dedicated to testing for regressions etc. would certainly seem like a good explanation for a quality dip.

    • By trymas 2026-01-277:091 reply

      What is SDET? Software Developer and Tester? QA?

      • By pjmlp 2026-01-2712:55

        Software Development Engineer in Test.

  • By mattbee 2026-01-2622:436 reply

    The key to having a nice time with Windows is 1) to give it loads of memory (32GB+ surely) and 2) to run a debloater script the moment you pick up a new system e.g. https://github.com/Raphire/Win11Debloat

    All the rubbish from the last 20 years - ads, OneDrive, Copilot, Office upsells, Candy Crush in the start menu - it can just disappear, leaving a pretty stable system that hasn't actually changed much.

    Apart from the awful control panels, anything else you don't like is probably replaceable. I really love startallback.com which brings back the regular start menu and lots of other little fixes.

    Obviously everyone deserves a computer that doesn't try to sell to them CONSTANTLY, and I wish Windows were better out of the box. But it doesn't take much adjustment to get there.

    • By the_snooze 2026-01-2622:45

      If only our technology were advanced enough that we could have an OS that didn't constantly undermine the user's intentions.

    • By debo_ 2026-01-2622:462 reply

      This looks great. In your experience, do you run it once and that's it? Or do you need to re-run as updates add or re-introduce "bloat"?

      • By mfro 2026-01-2622:50

        You definitely should run it after updates.

      • By mattbee 2026-01-2622:561 reply

        Personally I don't think I've ever re-run it. I think I've clicked a few buttons as I've seen alerts about new options appearing. But ultimately it's just a bunch of powershell commands to remove packages and set options. So I'd assume it's safe to run regularly.

        • By debo_ 2026-01-2623:56

          Thanks. I was asking because I was hoping to run it for a relative's computer that I am reinstalling Win11 on now, and they would not be capable of re-running it after the fact.

    • By sevensor 2026-01-271:411 reply

      > give it loads of memory (32GB+ surely)

      Make that 64 if you’re obliged to run Teams. I wonder how many power plants the US could retire if we all stopped using it.

      • By AnonHP 2026-01-273:37

        I wonder what exactly Microsoft did with “New Teams” that was supposedly written in Rust and uses the system browser engine or whatever instead of Electron. On release it seemed better, but now it seems as bloated, slow and annoying as the Electron one. MS Teams seems to have some incurable infection.

        If I could, MS Teams would be the second tool I’d eject out (after Outlook and Exchange). But the company I work in is tied to MS 365 and will not give up on Teams and its useless cousin SharePoint.

    • By conception 2026-01-2622:502 reply

      Or buy an IOT LTSC license to have an officially debloated version.

      • By Telaneo 2026-01-2623:38

        Or don't buy a licence and use it anyway.

      • By Krssst 2026-01-2623:032 reply

        How? It's only available to companies.

        • By chrisldgk 2026-01-2623:191 reply

          There are sites that will happily sell you keys, though I don’t feel qualified to comment on their legitimacy.

          You could also sail the seven seas and run an AutoKMS script, though that might (and probably will) include some malware.

          • By hamdingers 2026-01-2623:36

            If your options include paying for piracy or pirating for free, always pirate for free.

    • By tokyobreakfast 2026-01-2622:534 reply

      Linux is not getting better in those respects, either. DE's are crazy bloated. For everyone bitching about control panels, tell me how is it done in Linux? In the WM control panel or the DE control panel? Or some obscure .conf file you must edit by hand? Your guess is as good as mine and it's beyond disorganized. If I want to change a font it's a game of three card monte.

      Linux desktop environments remind me what TempleOS would look like if it was designed by committee.

      • By throwa356262 2026-01-277:31

        Have to disagree.

        Gnome for example has been working hard to simplify things (maybe a bit too hard?). The gnome settings panel is significantly simpler than win11 and osx dito.

        If you want to dive deeper there is a separate tweak app (not as simple), no reason fiddling with .conf files.

      • By Blackthorn 2026-01-2623:11

        Bloat is what you call any feature you're not actively using.

        Only difference is on Windows nobody wants those "features".

      • By realusername 2026-01-270:01

        There's a difference between features you don't use and pre-installed Minecraft and ads.

      • By heywire 2026-01-270:08

        Try a distro like Fedora. I mostly use Arch, but I’ve found Fedora to be an excellent out of the box experience.

    • By wiredpancake 2026-01-270:10

      [dead]

HackerNews