LLMs are sold on the premise of doing cool stuff and reasonably understanding intent and doing it. The man on the Clapham omnibus would not miss-interpret "no" like that.

The LLM asked: "Shall I implement [plan]". The response was "no". The LLM then went on to "interpret" what no referred to and got it wrong.

As you say, it is amusing but people are wiring these things up to bank accounts and all sorts.

I'm looking into using a Qwen3.5 quant to act as a network ... fiddler, for want of a better word but you can be sure I'll be taking rather more care than our errm "hero" (OP).

"Because the biggest problem with LLMs is that they can't right naturally like a human would."

Quod erat demonstrandum.

You can easily get the beasties to deliberately "trip up" with a leading conjunction and a mispeling ... and some crap punctuation etc.

Had to look them up (WP), wasn't disappointed. We have the Monster Raving Loony Party in the UK.

One of the Rhino's Party policies stands out - are you sure Trump wasn't born a Cannuck and was stolen at birth by racoons and smuggled down south?

"Annexing the United States, which would take its place as the third territory in Canada's backyard (after the Yukon and the Northwest Territories—Nunavut did not yet exist), in order to eliminate foreign control of Canada's natural resources"

"Because all of my services share the same IP address"

DNS. SNI. RLY?

What on earth does that mean?