I’ve had this sense that HN has gotten absolutely innundated with bots last few months. First most obvious giveaway is the frequency with which you see accounts posting brilliant insights like 13 60…
I’ve had this sense that HN has gotten absolutely innundated with bots last few months. First most obvious giveaway is the frequency with which you see accounts posting brilliant insights like
13 60 well and t6ctctfuvuh7hguhuig8h88gd to f6gug7h8j8h6fzbuvubt GB I be cugttc fav uhz cb ibub8vgxgvzdrc to bubuvtxfh tf d xxx h z j gj uxomoxtububonjbk P.l.kvh cb hug tf 6 go k7gtcv8j9j7gimpiiuh7i 8ubg
or
1662476506
or
Аё
Beyond the accounts that are visibly glitching out, the vibe is also seriously off. Lots of comments that are incredibly banal, or oddly off topic. Hard to really put a finger on how, but I had the idea of scraping /newcomments and /noobcomments to see if I could make sense of it. First is for comments that are recently made, and the second is for comments that are recently made by newly registred accounts.
With some simple statistics, I quickly found that:
Comments from newly registered accounts are nearly 10x more likely to use em-dashes, arrows, and other symbols in their text (17.47% vs 1.83% of comments). p = 7e-20
Comments from newly registered accounts on HN are also more likely to mention AI and LLMs (18.67% vs 11.8% of comments). p=0.0018
Sample size isn’t enormous, about 700 of each category, but these are pretty big differences. While regular humans sometimes use EM-dashes, arrows, and the like, it’s hard to explain why new accounts would be 10x more prone to using them than established accounts.
Read the original article
Comments
Prior to the rise of LLM-written posts and the natural reaction of hair-trigger suspicion, I used to em and en dash fairly often in posts on HN. No reason really other than being a bit of a typography geek who happens to have always used dashes in casual writing instead of semicolons. So when I was setting up a modifier-key keyboard layer with AHK many years ago I put the em dash on modifier+dash just because I could - which made it easy.
Now someone may search old posts without a time cutoff and assume I'm an LLM. That combined with the fact I sometimes write longer posts and naturally default to pretty good punctuation, spelling and grammar, is basically a perfect storm of traits. I've already had posts accused twice in the past year of being an LLM.
Kind of sad some random quirk of LLM training caused a fun little typography thing I did just for myself (assuming no one else would even notice) to become something negative.
By marssaxman 2026-02-2519:1813 reply My teenager recently asked me why I write like a chatbot, apparently unaware that some human beings prefer to write in complete sentences with attention to details like spelling, punctuation, grammar, and capitalization, and that LLMs were trained on this sort of writing.
This makes me think of the fad where people on youtube will hold a microphone up in frame, because it somehow connotes authenticity. I'm sure some people are already embracing a bit of sloppiness in their writing as a signal of humanity; I'm equally sure that future chatbots will learn to do the same.
By ASalazarMX 2026-02-2521:455 reply 2040 at Wal-Mart:
- Customer: Excuse me, I'm looking for the Aunt Jemima maple syrup. Can you point me in the right direction?
- Employee: y u ask like chatbot
By benatkin 2026-02-262:42 Wal–Mart?
BTW in their company chat they call it a squiggly even though it's flat. That always bugged me.
Edit: I stand corrected. It wasn't flat from 1966 to 1981 and the cheer started in 1975, and included "squiggly" back then - Sam Walton himself said it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walmart#1990%E2%80%932005:_Ret...
Edit 2: Both squiggly and the introduction of the cheer appear in the Walmart timeline: https://corporate.walmart.com/about/history
Interesting use of "Aunt Jemima" that nobody caught on, why did you use this particularly, afaik it doesn't exist anymore for being "racist"?
By marssaxman 2026-02-2617:19 What do you mean by that? The brand was renamed several years ago:
https://www.pearlmillingcompany.com/our-history
"In June 2020, PepsiCo and The Quaker Oats Company made a commitment to change the name and image of Aunt Jemima, recognizing that they do not reflect our core values.
We want to thank everyone who has made us part of their family over the years, and look forward to starting a new chapter as the Pearl Milling Company."
By asdfasvea 2026-02-284:38 I caught on but was more offended by referring to it as 'maple syrup'
By ASalazarMX 2026-02-2623:591 reply I didn't know it was discontinued in 2021. It was my favorite maple syrup growing up.
By oxzidized 2026-02-2713:35 From what I read, it just got re-branded, not discontinued.
By tim333 2026-02-2614:02 Maybe the fashions will have swung against woke by 2040?
By wiredpancake 2026-02-262:14 There will be no such thing as an "Walmart Employee" in 2040.
There is a decent chance the term "Employee" as a whole will be eradicated sometime in the next 10 years.
By swid 2026-02-2521:54 Is the customer actually a chat bot though? That brand is renamed, but maybe after the training cutoff date.
By mikkupikku 2026-02-261:242 reply There's a bit in Anathem about the secular society sometimes having their literacy degenerate to such an extent that they stop using alphabetic / phonetic writing systems and revert to pictographic or ideographic systems. Immediately made me think of the hospital scene in Idiocracy... and also the way some people make heavy use of emojis.
By nneonneo 2026-02-2612:31 On the other hand, Korean ditched the ideographic Hanja (Chinese Character) writing system because it was too difficult to learn, in favour of a much simpler phonetic one. In Japan, the classical Kanji Chinese writing system was considered a prestige language and was customarily not taught to ordinary folks; the modern Hiragana script evolved as an easy-to-learn alternative, (initially) used heavily by women who were often not taught Kanji.
Of course, Chinese characters are not pictographic and haven't been for a few thousand years, but they are still largely ideographic.
> having their literacy degenerate to such an extent that they stop using alphabetic / phonetic writing systems and revert to pictographic or ideographic systems
What about reverting to referencing moving pictures?
Or was this intended to be self-referential and I missed the joke? :)
By rlpb 2026-02-2623:12 Shaka, when the walls fell
By mikkupikku 2026-02-2620:241 reply Anathem is a book ;)
By BobbyTables2 2026-02-274:15 Probably should also explain how to use a book…
You’re talking about ancient technology here…
By jasomill 2026-02-267:34 “Welcome to Costco. I love you.”
By pksebben 2026-02-2523:46 "Yeah so it says on your chart here..."
By mcbishop 2026-02-2521:19 The creator of OpenClaw, for example, has come to appreciate grammatical / spelling errors in human writing (as he said in a recent Lex Fridman interview).
If you are using a dynamic microphone, most of the time it will be in frame because best distance is around 7cm from your mouth.
By marssaxman 2026-02-261:291 reply Sure, but when you see someone holding up a lav mic between their thumb and forefinger, that's not audio engineering; that has to be social signaling, or perhaps uninformed mimicry.
By pcchristie 2026-02-2611:20 It's uninformed mimicry. Someone very close to me (I won't name names!) bought one and did it the other day for their business and I was absolutely shocked when I saw their draft video. I asked them what they thought the clip was for.
It's a massive trend all over IG and TikTok these days as there's a lot of mobile-friendly consumer gear that brings your Social Media Content up a fairly large way for fairly low cost. Ironically, the mimicry probably spreads because those that know what they're doing partially or fully conceal it which is by definition less likely to be noticed and therefore imitated by first timers/novices.
> people on youtube will hold a microphone up in frame,
Now you need a really big microphone, something that looks like it was built in 1952.
By rzzzt 2026-02-2521:46 Lapel mic clipped on a cooking utensil works as well.
By SunshineTheCat 2026-02-2523:56 I recently posted a youtube short of some of my drawings I did on my iPad using Procreate and moving them into Illustrator.
Got several comments saying they were "AI slop."
Even had a screen cap of my drawing process.
Kinda funny to think my drawings, which have likely "trained" AI image generators, are now getting accused of being AI.
By globular-toast 2026-02-267:10 I've been thinking about the "human signal" ever since the first GPT. Interestingly, a few years ago I would get people questioning whether my posts were written by GPT, but that's stopped now. I'm not sure if it's because they no longer think that or because it's not interesting any more.
I wonder if there's a way we can communicate that LLMs fundamentally can't keep up with. If LLMs have hit on being exactly the way our brains work then I guess not. But maybe we still have something special. I haven't tried how well LLMs understand language written like in Iain M. Banks's Feersum Endjinn.
By SpaceManNabs 2026-02-2521:37 I got similar accusations recently on reddit lol. Just because i am used to formatting markdown i like to format some of my reddit comments. i have no idea how to avoid the accusations besides typing less formally except by typing like thisss.
By andreareina 2026-02-269:251 reply I'm given to understand that you've got to have your mic pretty close up to keep noise down. You don't have to eat it, but it wants to be close enough that it's going to be in frame.
Ed: I'm sure there's cargo culting going on but the visibility of the mic isn't only performative.
By plausibility 2026-02-2613:23 The thing they’re describing is people hand holding lapel mics right up to their mouth, rather than clipping them to their lapel or shirt or anything (where I assume they’re designed to go still). Seems more ‘indie filmmaker’ where actually clipping it on seems too polished, and why would you trust someone who’s from Big Lapel Mic on TikTok.
This lead to other people clipping them onto random objects to make fun of the trend for a while.
By kcexn 2026-02-260:15 I can imagine a future where writing that is considered sloppy today is considered good because of LLMs.
I started making deliberate grammar and spelling mistakes in professional context. Not like I have a perfect writing anyway, but at least I could prove that it was self-written, not an auto-generated slop. (Could be self-written slop though :)
This applies not only work-stuff itself also to the job-applications/cv/resume and cover-letters.
By mghackerlady 2026-02-2519:5710 reply unrelated but I've never understood how to put a smiley at the end of parenthetical sentences (which comes up surprisingly often for me since I use smileys a lot and also like using parentheses). Just the smiley as an end parentheses (like this :) feels off but adding another parentheses (like this :) ) makes it look like it should be nested which causes problems since I also tend to nest parenthetical sentences (like (this)).
Yes I enjoy lisp, how could you tell
The answer is obviously to balance your smiley faces and wrap the entire statement in the smiley face sentiment. ((: Like this :))
By mghackerlady 2026-02-2521:45 I like this simply for the absurdity of it, but will only use it when the entire parenthetical is modified by the smiley instead of a single word or phrase (:since I really like it:) but (it looks ugly, no hard feelings :) )
By normie3000 2026-02-261:031 reply Ah, Spanish notation.
By just6979 2026-02-2618:29 You have to invert the front one! (⸵ Of course, only noticable if it's a winky ;)
Turned Semicolon (U+2E35 ⸵)
By mrexroad 2026-02-2522:57 That’s quite the Scheme…
By rpastuszak 2026-02-2520:443 reply Your comment made me realise that there's logic to this (like this :), since in HTML we can:
instead of: <li> ... </li><li> do this <li> and thisand <img alt='this'> instead of <img ... />
You might like Lisp, but what you're saying reminds me of the late 00s/early 2010s xHTML2 vs. HTML5 debate :)
By mghackerlady 2026-02-2521:46 I'm an avid defender of xHTML. You can pry it from my cold dead hands
By qingcharles 2026-02-264:20 You monster.
By abustamam 2026-02-2522:20 Thanks, I hate it :)
Post C++11 you can just do (like this:)), no extra space needed before the last parenthesis.
By mghackerlady 2026-02-2521:471 reply But then it looks like I'm using a double smiley[0] which I do actually use on occasion
[0] :))
You could use a bracket in the smiley (like this :]) as is sometimes used when nesting parentheticals.
By mghackerlady 2026-02-2614:09 I sometimes do the opposite and use brackets for the parentheticals [like this :)]
By kruffalon 2026-02-2520:19 I tend to rephrase myself so I dont end a statement inside a parenthesis with a smiley.
It's one of those things I think are worth putting some extra effort into, I'm glad to see at least one other person giving it some thought. Thx <3
By tuetuopay 2026-02-2521:31 Use dashes and the problem goes away! Well, you gain the LLM witch-hunt, but heh, no free lunch.
By 0x38B 2026-02-269:39 Synthetic example:
"Вот его, нет, не допустили (сама знаешь, почему)))"
My translation:
"But him - no, they didn't let him in (of course you know why :)"
When I went from texting friends in Russian or Ukrainian back to English, I missed right parentheses as a smiley; one or two - hi), hello)) - to me are like a smile, by ))) and )))) there's some laughing or some other joke going on. Native speakers could weigh in; my native tongue is English.
allow me to introduce my friend – turned smiley here he is: ´◡` (quite useful for brackets ´◡`)
you can find him on windows by pressing Win + ; not as fast as typing, but quite faster then typing and then wondering if thats too much brackets or too little
By mghackerlady 2026-02-2614:341 reply I love kaomoji so I use this on occasion but nothing can match the subtle passive aggressiveness and level of expression unmatched by anything else :)
By vonunov 2026-02-2712:38 You're really on to something there (-:
By stiglitz 2026-02-269:17 I’ve always been bothered by instances of your first example, and I mostly use “XD” instead of “:)” to sidestep the issue in my own writing.
By MarsIronPI 2026-02-2521:47 The relevant XKCD: https://xkcd.com/541
By giancarlostoro 2026-02-2520:481 reply I have the same problem. I just ditch the smiley face. :)
By mghackerlady 2026-02-2522:531 reply never >:(
By giancarlostoro 2026-02-2523:13 Are you quoting someone doing a sad face or are you angry? ;)
This only works as "proof" up until someone innovates an "authenticity" flag on the LLM output.
By judahmeek 2026-02-2521:48 By Aerroon 2026-02-262:27 tbh u can basically do this now lol... no flag needed.
if u want it to sound more real u just gotta tell the bot to write that way. like literally just ask it to throw in some typos or forget to capitalize stuff. or use slang and kinda ramble instead of being all robotic and organized.
By dylan604 2026-02-2521:35 I'm trademarking the improper use of it/it's, there/their/they're, were/we're, etc as a sign of my humanity. Apple's typocorrect is doing it for me anyways.
By tomxor 2026-02-2522:53 > I started making deliberate grammar and spelling mistakes in professional context.
I've also noticed an increase of this in myself and others, I used to edit a lot more before sending anything, but now it seems more authentic if you just hit send so it's more off the cuff with typos, broken sentences and all.
I'm sure an LLM could easily mimic this but it's not their default.
By trollbridge 2026-02-2521:52 I’ve been doing the same thing. Basically a Turing test.
I appreciate you including a few minor mistakes in this very post:
> I started making deliberate grammar and spelling mistakes in professional context[s]. Not like I have ~a~ perfect writing anyway, but at least I could prove that it was self-written, not an auto-generated slop. (Could be self-written slop though :)
> This applies not only [to] work-stuff itself also to the job-applications/cv/resume and cover-letters.
I conclude you are real.
By normie3000 2026-02-261:07 To me the OP read like a particular dialect of English which is quite common on HN, rather than being incorrect.
By mikkupikku 2026-02-261:14 I've seen some youtube people just holding random objects as though they were microphones, I guess deliberately meming on the conspicuous microphone thing. Or maybe it helps with their confidence, I could see that.
You're absolutely right! I kid. I'm also a former avid user of the em-dash, but have mostly stopped using it. I've even started replacing em-dash usage with commas, which often results in a slightly awkward, perhaps incorrect, but quaintly artisanal sentence with a LaCroix-like spritz of authenticity.
My double-space-after-a-period though, I will keep that until the end. Even if it often doesn't even render in HTML output, I feel a nostalgic connection to my 1993 high school typing teacher's insistence that a sentence must be allowed to breathe.
And by the way, what the Hell is up with all these people claiming that two spaces is an obsolete typewriter-era pre-proportional-font thing? Narrow proportional spaces make two spaces after a period MORE important for visually separating sentences. Is it old fashioned to think logically?
It’s old fashioned to think that space in the input relates to space in the output.
By jeremy151 2026-02-2614:58 Yes, I find it useful while editing regardless of the final rendering. Maybe it's a quirk of how I process information visually, or a holdover from learning to type on an avocado green Selectric.
By CuriouslyC 2026-02-261:27 Sadly, the comma is not a good em-dash replacement. IME, periods and semicolons do the job best. I still use em-dashes in place of parentheses though because they're so much more readable.
By skue 2026-02-2613:01 You know the only reason we used double spaces between sentences in the typewriter days was because everything was monospaced, right? Modern variable width fonts provide additional space automatically.
By mike_hearn 2026-02-2519:433 reply Have the same problem but with bullet points, which I learned to type years ago and have used on HN for a long time:
• Like
• This
(option-8 on a Mac US keyboard layout). Now it looks like something only an LLM would do.
By mghackerlady 2026-02-2520:00 Hell I've been accused simply for using markdown. Granted, excessive formatting in markdown (especially when I'm telling a bad faith wikipedia contributor to cut it out since wikipedia doesn't even use markdown) is one of the biggest suspects for me but theres a difference between italicising something for emphasis and and *bolding* every statement *to an excessive degree*
By ale42 2026-02-2520:27 For those who are interested, that one is Alt-7 (numeric keypad) on Windows. This works because in the "OEM" codepage (e.g. 437), char 7 corresponds to a symbol that is mapped into Unicode to • (← I just typed this using Alt-7, and the arrow using Alt-27). In a similar way I type the infamous ones—the ones that give you away as an LLM even if you aren't one. It's Alt-0151, this time with no OEM codepage conversion because of the zero in front (anyway that codepage had no em-dashes, the closest one would be Alt-196, which is ─, i.e. a line drawing character).
I love using ° with is the opt-shift-8 when posting temps to indicate I'm on a real keyboard and not some device. Plus, it's just faster than typing degrees
By aardvark179 2026-02-260:53 iPhone—hold down 0 and ° should be on the pop up.
℃ and ℉ to the rescue! https://graphemica.com/%E2%84%83
> this is a compatibility character provided for roundtrip compatibility with legacy encodings. […] The Unicode standard explicitly discourages the use of this character
By rzzzt 2026-02-2620:07 I'm sort of buying and not buying this interpretation. Celsius is discussed under section "Unit symbols" in the PDF (page 8-9 of the linked Chapter 22), where the quoted "it is better" sentence appears...
...then immediately afterwards a new section named "Compatibility" starts where the use of code points that are composites of several letters, e.g. ℡ and ℻ are indeed discouraged, suggesting they be spelled out in full as TEL and FAX instead.
Do you feel ℃ falls into a continuation/overlap between these two sections?
By abustamam 2026-02-2522:23 My phone has the degree sign ° but it requires me to click on numerical input then additional symbols to access, so I just shorthand it to deg.
By altairprime 2026-02-2519:361 reply How dire the literacy crisis, that chatbots are their only exposure to composition.
By heresie-dabord 2026-02-261:13 The future of education is LLMs representing educational standards to a population of innumerates and illiterates.
By MerrimanInd 2026-02-2521:49 > default to pretty good punctuation, spelling and grammar
If leaving out the Oxford comma here was an intentional joke I both commend and curse you!
By WesolyKubeczek 2026-02-2521:41 > Now someone may search old posts without a time cutoff and assume I'm an LLM.
I use em dashes, and I don't care whether or not someone assumes I'm an LLM. Typography exists for a reason.
By colechristensen 2026-02-2519:161 reply My rage–induced habit of ignoring typos caused by the iPhone autocorrect and general abuse of English is suddenly authentic and not lazy and slightly obnoxious (ok maybe it's still those things too)
>I put the em dash on modifier+dash
This is the default on Macs
By chirayuk 2026-02-273:54 It's Option Shift "-" for the em-dash. Option "-" is the en-dash.
Ex-academic here. I too use/tended to use em-dashes quite a bit. It's easy to compose in Linux (Gnome) with a real keyboard: Ctrl Shift U 2014 is ingrained in my head from using them all the time in my academic work.
By BenjiWiebe 2026-02-2521:111 reply Are you familiar with the 'Compose' key/xcompose?
By blooalien 2026-02-269:41 Indeed, the compose key is how I've always handled easy access to additional (proper? complete?) punctuation (and several other useful characters) capabilities on desktop Linux for many years now. I usually set the Caps-Lock key to my compose key because I literally never use Caps-Lock anyhow, so it's nice to turn it into a useful key. :)
By calf 2026-02-260:08 As an em-dash abuser I have decided that it is a crutch to not think through what I am saying--I can lazily connect a stream of thoughts rather than think clearly and explicitly form sentence transitions and so on
I do agree... I sometimes use worse grammar (like that ellipses) and leave in typos just so my comments feel more "real" now.
By goodmythical 2026-02-2520:101 reply fun fact, grok and kimi are both pretty good at emulating "chat" responses with any number of prompts.
"respond like a twitter user", "pretend like we're texting", etc
By Imustaskforhelp 2026-02-2520:21 > fun fact, grok and kimi are both pretty good at emulating "chat" responses with any number of prompts.
> "respond like a twitter user", "pretend like we're texting", etc
+1 to it. I actually had given a response to the above parent comment itself using Kimi and I would've said that its (sort of) a good emulation fwiw.
By xeckr 2026-02-266:37 Show HN: A RL suite that teaches LLMs to introduce typos at just the right frequency for the output to appear more human.
By Imustaskforhelp 2026-02-2519:431 reply soon were gonna be the ones adding random typos and grammer errors just to blend in. i skip apostrophes and mispell words on purpose already. its strange how fast sloppy writing starts feeling natural
(This above line itself was written by AI itself: https://www.kimi.com/share/19c96516-4032-8b73-8000-0000f45eb...)
I don't know if worse grammar could make a difference aside from removing false negatives (ie. nowadays people with good grammar are questioned if they are LLM's or not) but this itself doesn't mean that worse grammar itself means its written by a human. (This paragraph is written by me, a human, Hi :D)
Honestly, first paragraph sounds more human and sincere for sure.
Also adding better "context" into the discussion, than the usual claims/punchlines of marketing-speak.
Maybe it's not exactly the grammar itself but also overall structuring of the idea/thought into the process. The regular output sounds much more like marketing-piece or news-coverage than an individual anyway. I think, people wanna discuss things with people, not with a news-editor.
By Imustaskforhelp 2026-02-2520:43 > I think, people wanna discuss things with people, not with a news-editor.
If I understand you correctly, then Yes I completely agree, but my worry is that this can also be "emulated" as shown by my comment by Models already available to us. My question is, technically there's nothing to stop new accounts from using say Kimi and to have a system prompt meant to not sound AI and I feel like it can be effective.
If that's the case, doesn't that raise the question of what we can detect as AI or not (which was my point), the grand parent comment suggests that they use intentionally bad human writing sometimes to not be detected as AI but what I am saying is that AI can do that thing too, so is intentionally bad writing itself a good indicator of being human?
And a bigger question is if bad writing isn't an indicator, then what is?
Or if there can even be an good indicator (if say the bot is cautious)? If there isn't, can we be sure if the comments we read are AI or not
Essentially the dead-internet-theory. I feel like most websites have bots but we know that they are bots and they still don't care but we are also in this misguided trust that if we see some comments which don't feel like obvious bots, then they must be humans.
My question is, what if that can be wrong? It feels to me definitely possible with current Tech/Models like say Kimi for example, Doesn't this lead to some big trust issues within the fabric of internet itself?
Personally, I don't feel like the whole website's AI but there are chances of some sneaky action happening at distance type of new accounts for sure which can be LLM's and we can be none the wiser.
All the same time that real accounts are gonna get questioned if they are LLM or not if they are new (my account is almost 2 years old fwiw and I got questioned by people esentially if this account is AI or not)
But what this does do however, is make people definitely lose a bit of trust between each other and definitely a little cautious towards each message that they read.
(This comment's a little too conspiratorial for my liking but I can't help but shake this feeling sometimes)
It just is all so weird for me sometimes, Idk but I guess that there's still an intuition between whose human and not and actually the HN link/article iteslf shows that most people who deploy AI on HN in newer accounts use standard models without much care which is the reason why em-dashes get detected and maybe are good detector for sometime/some-people and this could make the original OP's comment of intentionally having bad grammar to sound more human make sense too because em-dashes do have more probability of sounding AI than not :/
It's just this very weird situation and I am not sure how to explain where depending on from whatever situation you look at, you can be right.
You can try to hurt your grammar to sound more human and that would still be right
and you can try to be the way you are because you think that models can already have intentionally bad grammar too/capable of it and to have bad grammar isn't a benchmark itself for AI/not so you are gonna keep using good grammar and you are gonna be right too.
It's sort of like a paradox and I don't have any answers :/ Perhaps my suggestion right now feels to me to not overthink about it.
Because if both situations are right, then do whatever imo. Just be human yourself and then you can back down this statement with well truth that you are human even if you get called AI.
So I guess, TLDR: Speak good grammar or not intentionally, just write human and that's enough or that should be enough I guess.
By _verandaguy 2026-02-2519:29 Same here, but it'll be a cold day in hell before you see me using the dreaded double-period-bang..!
Were you using them as a replacement for a comma--without spaces on both sides of the em-dash--like how I did just now? If no, you are safe from being mistaken for an LLM program. Honestly, while it is a legitimate punctuation rule, I've never seen a human on the internet to write like that. But LLMs do it constantly, whenever they generate long enough sentences.
By 98codes 2026-02-2522:04 I'm a human who writes like that, because mobile and desktop OSs have made it easy—so easy—to include things like em-dashes and other formerly uncommon punctuation. I also come from an age where people were taught things like proper grammar and punctuation, so go figure.
By dylan604 2026-02-2521:38 I've used the -- with no spaces in posts to HN multiple times.
By abustamam 2026-02-2522:25 I use double hyphens instead of em-dashes when I'm on my computer. I think some programs will combine them into an em-dash but most of the time they're just double dashes.
My phone lets me long-press the hyphen key to get an em-dash so sometimes I'll use it.
Probably the biggest tell that I'm not AI is that I'm probably not using it in the appropriate circumstances!
By hojinkoh 2026-02-2610:15 I still have em-dash pinned at the top of my clipboard manager. Though nowadays I'm training myself to use some more definitely incorrect punctuations ((like this)) in informal scenarios;; hopefully LLMs won't catch up to such strange usage anytime soon.
Broken sentences. Also useful. Like in some literature works.
By mainframed 2026-02-2521:04 I also used em-dash before LLMs, though I would not call myself a typography geek. But yesterday I wrote a birthday message to someone and replaced my em-dashes with minus signs, because I did not want them to think that my message is LLM generated..
By sodacanner 2026-02-2519:204 reply It really is unfortunate that such a fun piece of punctuation has been effectively gutted. This isn't even really limited to just the em-dash, but I don't know if there's another example of a corporation (or set of them) having such a massive impact on grammar and writing as OpenAI and their ilk have.
Entire sentence structures have been effectively blacklisted from use. It's repulsive.
By hsbauauvhabzb 2026-02-2519:34 Surely AI engine developers will notice patterns in which humans identify them, and change their behavior to avoid detection.
You’d think ethically leaving it in would be better. But we’re talking about big tech companies here.
By smallmancontrov 2026-02-2519:363 reply It's not just repulsive — it's the complete destruction of tool through intense overuse!
Speaking of overusing something until it becomes cringe, has anyone shown their kids Firefly? Does it still hold up after the Joss Whedon signature bathos (and other tics) became a tentpole of the Marvel Cinematic Universe and created an abundance of cultural antibodies?
By cmrdporcupine 2026-02-2520:20 My kids liked it when they were younger teens. But we'd also already been through Buffy, which they liked.
There were a few times we cringed a bit (with both shows) but overall stood the test of time. I didn't watch Buffy & Angel first time around, so it was a bit of a cultural moment I got caught up on. And it was nice to revisit Firefly, the little bit of it we got.
By mike_hearn 2026-02-2519:411 reply The writing of Firefly was top notch and still holds up great. The MCU tried to imitate the style and mostly failed. But it helped that Firefly was much less overwrought in general.
By smallmancontrov 2026-02-2519:53 Glad to hear it, thanks!
I don't have kids myself, but friends have shown Firefly to theirs and I'm happy to report that it still holds up. There's hope for the future yet.
By smallmancontrov 2026-02-2519:54 Cool, glad to hear it!
By Imustaskforhelp 2026-02-2519:301 reply > It really is unfortunate that such a fun piece of punctuation has been effectively gutted. This isn't even really limited to just the em-dash, but I don't know if there's another example of a corporation (or set of them) having such a massive impact on grammar and writing as OpenAI and their ilk have.
Well, to be fair Gen-z slangs also have a massive impact. My generation sometimes point blank said to me that they didn't have the attention span to read my sentence :/
Definitely picked up a few slangs along the way now. I had to somehow toggle a switch between how I write on HN/how I write with my friends the first few times and I write pretty informally in HN, but its that you got to be saying lowk bussin rizz 67 to make sense.
My friends who use insta literally had Abbreivations which were of 9 letter words in my own language that the insta community of my nation's gen-z sort of made.
Although I would agree that we haven't seen a whole unicode being thrown this way in ALL generations (I feel like universally everyone treats em-dashes as something written by AI or definitely get an AI alert)
But I think that 67 is something that atp maybe even most adults might have gotten exposed to which has probably changed the meaning of number.
By mghackerlady 2026-02-2520:03 The attention span thing is so real. I'll post a 2 sentence response to a comment and get a "I'm not reading allat"
By NetMageSCW 2026-02-2522:46 What’s repulsive is the people who comment incorrectly based on that punctuation or grammar use and the ones who then kowtow to public opinion as if it matters.
There is no such thing as blacklisted by other commenters.
I'm also increasingly aware that my own writing style and punctuation seem to line up with what might be associated with an AI, but some of the tells (em-dashes, spaces after periods, etc) seem like artifacts of when in history we learned to write.
I wonder how much crossover there would be between a trained text analysis model looking for Gen-X authors and another looking for LLM's.
By ibejoeb 2026-02-2520:57 I worked on something like this in 2000-1. We were attempting to identify the native language and origin region of authors based on aberrant modes in second languages (as a simple case, a french person writing english might say "we are tuesday.") It was accurate and fast with the sota back then; I think you could one-shot a general purpose LLM today.
By mghackerlady 2026-02-2520:011 reply People don't put spaces after periods? Do people really write.like.this?
By NetMageSCW 2026-02-2522:441 reply Happens to me all the time trying to type a search phrase in Safari in iPhone for some reason.
By plausibility 2026-02-2613:30 When you’re trying to type a URL there’s a period next to the space bar where your right thumb usually hits space, but if you’re just texting iOS won’t show that. That’s my theory, just muscle memory.
By AlecSchueler 2026-02-2519:431 reply Fwiw your comment has lots of human tells and doesn't seem AI generated at all.
By mrandish 2026-02-2520:31 Sadly, I think the same is true for my two posts accused of being LLM generated. It's become a bit of a reflexive witch-hunt when just being more than five sentences and basically decent grammar / vocabulary is enough to garner some drive-by accusations. Hopefully, it's a short-term over reaction that will subside.
By nextaccountic 2026-02-262:03 I used to use a minus dash "-" often on my comments. Not em dash, but, still, it might be confused for AI, so I stopped doing that.l
By azalemeth 2026-02-2519:32 I have consistently used em-dashes, either in the form of alt+- on MacOS, or in the form of `--` in LaTeX (or `---`), for the last 30 odd years.
Now I find myself deliberately making things worse to avoid being accused of not being human! Bah!
By xdennis 2026-02-2519:24 I used to do that too… even using the ellipses character instead of three dots. But on the other hand I'm not a native English speaker and have poor spelling (i.e. words pass spell check, but are incorrect).
That's one of the signals I use to detect if YouTube videos are AI slop. If it's narrated by a non-native speaker, it's much more likely to be high quality. If it's narrated by a British voice with a deep timber, it's 100% AI.
By zeristor 2026-02-2521:58 When every breath is a Turing test, AmIBotOrNot?
I’m waiting for a Philip K. Dick bot to declare me non-human.
Am I the only one who in a Captcha test sometimes wants a different option for the “I am Human” check box? Ironically really since to prove we’re human we have to check the boxes with a crossing in them, no account to be made of people who call them zebra crossings.
By hinkley 2026-02-2519:18 I use “-“ because I thought the amount of parentheticals I was using was a bit unhinged. In these times of TLDR, I sometimes move the aside to the bottom as an afterthought instead of leaving it inline.
I dunno this en versus em dash stuff, I just use the minus sign on my keyboard.
By AlyssaRowan 2026-02-2519:41 I do a similar thing — also with AHK! — and I don’t intend to stop. I think probably the AI/LLM bubble will pop before I consider changing my habits there.
Tip: Patterns like “It’s not just X, it’s Y” are a more telltale sign of LLM slop. I assume they probably trained on too much marketing blurb at some point and now it’s stuck.
I also used — and "proper" quotes which macOS/iOS puts in for you anyway
I also like …
This is like ruining swastikas and loading rainbows
By mghackerlady 2026-02-2520:052 reply The ellipsis problem is solved by using ... instead of the dedicated unicode character
By mattmanser 2026-02-2519:201 reply ChatGPT evolves, everything grows. In AI speech, tells abound. Comma, emphasis. A new way, a better way.
By danparsonson 2026-02-2523:16 > Comma, emphasis.
> A new way, a better way.
The autumn winds blow.
By anotherevan 2026-02-2523:57 > assume I'm an LLM
I've noticed a habit of late of people accusing a comment of being LLM generated if they disagree with it. It was getting quite tiresome a few weeks ago but seems to have died down.
I suppose it is possible that they are actually LLMs making the accusations? :-)
(I'm one of those weirdos that try to use proper grammar and complete sentences in text messages and instant messages.)
By dmos62 2026-02-2520:42 Exactly what an LLM would say, haha.
By kandros 2026-02-2520:54 Nice try
By colin_fraizer 2026-02-2519:10 [dead]
By tempaccountabgd 2026-03-021:42 [dead]
I'm still salty that I can't use em-dashes anymore for fear of my writing being flagged as AI generated. Been using them for years—it's just `alt+shift+-` on a Mac keyboard and I find them more legible in many fonts compared to the simple dash on the typical numpad.
It's so sad to me that good typographical conventions have been co-opted by the zeitgeist of LLMs.
LLM fatigue is real. It's not just em-dash — it's the overall tone of the writing that clues people in. But if your viewpoints and approach are unique, your typesetting won't raise suspicion of machine-generation, except in the most dull of readers. Just be you and it will be fine.
If you'd like more tips on writing I'd be happy to help.
By natpalmer1776 2026-02-2519:17 This is art. If it weren't so difficult to capture the full context I would literally print and frame this comment.
Edit: I take that back. I'm going to print and frame this comment. It stands on its own well enough, and I'm the only one who's going to see it.
Second Edit: Took a bit to get it formatted in a way I liked, but I have officially placed an order for my local Walmart photo center
By rout39574 2026-02-2518:29 You, sir, are evil. I mean that in the most complementary of manners.
By fsckboy 2026-02-2521:53 on HN, the problem is not LLMs, it's everybody talking about LLMs incessantly
By escapeteam 2026-02-2521:38 You‘re absolutely correct!
Just do it anyway—I always have, and always will.
Well, I haven't always—just for maybe 20 years.
Someone should ban this bot, I've seen it before and it's always pretending to run this place
It doesn't look like a bot. created: August 18, 2007 karma: 36696
By jules-jules 2026-02-2613:22 It was a joke. Dang is the site-wide moderator
By burnt-resistor 2026-02-2518:53 ;)
I defer to Merriam-Webster and/or Harbrace (rather than TCMoS) on punctuation usage.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/em-dash-en-dash-how-...
Magical signal panacea searching is ultimately fruitless. Other ways to make bot interactions more difficult, there are policy and technological obstacles that could be introduced. For example, require an official desktop or mobile app for interaction. And then for any text copy-pasted, demarcate it. And throw an error message for any input typed inhumanly-fast. Require a micropayment of like $0.10 to comment. While these things would break the interaction style and flexibility for a lot of innocent human users, these would throw big wrenches into some but not all vulnerabilities of bot interactions.
By inkyoto 2026-02-265:47 Before the wide adoption of Unicode in mainstream operating systems, quite a few people used -- (two ASCII minus signs) to differentiate between a hyphen and a dash (of either pedigree), and some people used -- in emails and online where a dash was required.
Most think that it came from TeX, which had -- (for an en dash) and --- (for an em dash, although I don't think I have ever observed it out in the wild outside TeX), but in fact, the habit well predates TeX and goes all the way back to typewriters where typists habitually hit two hyphens in a row to approximate an em dash. The approximated em dash was described in hard-copy manuscript preparation rules such as The Chicago Manual of Style.
So, if you have ever used a typewriter or TeX, you can claim an even richer than 20 years’ heritage of using the em dash.
By edanm 2026-02-2518:37 I'm exactly the opposite. It'd been on my todo list for years to one day learn the difference between the different dashes. I kept putting not doing it.
Then came LLMs, and there was so much talk of them using em dashes. A few weeks ago, I finally decided it's time and learned the difference. (Which took all of 2 minutes, btw.) Now I love em dashes and am putting them everywhere I can! Even though most people now assume I'm using AI to write for me.
In a lot of ways, it feels like this is simply a fight for recognition that the Mac keyboard supports emdashes.
This wouldn't be an issue if mobile users or Windows users were exercising it too, but it's just Mac owners and LLMs. And Mac owners are probably the minority of instances where it is used.
By acheron 2026-02-2519:45 It works on mobile iOS too. Either the hold down - or just typing -- and letting it autocorrect will work.
By fernandotakai 2026-02-2518:231 reply i've always used double dashes -- because i once i setup a osx shortcut to change those into em-dashes, but i never bother to setup this again in other computers.
so now, i just use double dashes for everything.
(shit, i wonder when llms will start doing this instead of normal em)
By abustamam 2026-02-2522:32 Then we start using triple dashes to throw them off and then when they catch onto that we can reclaim em dashes!
By jedberg 2026-02-2518:50 Hey @dang, I think I found another AI bot you need to ban.
By vanschelven 2026-02-2518:45 I read a text from the 60s by my grandfather this week and seeing an emdash made the LLM alarm in my head go off... Had to really stop myself before I went all "and you" on him
My thoughts exactly. As somebody who has always loved to use em-dashes and bulleted lists to organize my thoughts, this is heartbreaking.
It's like being named Michael Bolton and watching a singer rise in fame named Michael Bolton.
Why should I change my style?
By dredmorbius 2026-02-260:31 Or an exceedingly principled and well-respected award-winning journalist named "Alex Jones":
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_S._Jones>
(No, not that one.)
By latexr 2026-02-2519:19 > It's like being named Michael Bolton and watching a singer rise in fame named Michael Bolton.
For those who don’t know the reference:
By bigstrat2003 2026-02-268:11 > Why should I change my style?
Office Space jokes aside, you shouldn't. I think it's very important to be yourself and refuse to let people pressure you into changing for no good reason. I am not an em dash user myself, as it's a pain to generate when there's no key on the keyboard for it. But if I were, you best believe I wouldn't change my style one bit. People can accuse me of being an LLM if they wish, but that's no skin off my back.
By Terretta 2026-02-2520:53 > good typographical conventions
Here since 2010 in this account, I use em-dashes.
It's easy—and effective—to type using “Opt Shift -” on a Mac.
Oh yeah, left and right “curly quotes” as well, and the occasional …
> It's so sad
Don’t forget «’» — but ain’t nobody got time for that!
A few more to reclaim typography: https://howtotypeanything.com/alt-codes-on-mac/
I switched to semicolons... They look similar enough in use to string things together. I'm sure AI is coming for those too though, and that will be a grim day because those are my last stand.
There are times when an em dash can be used in place of a semicolon, but I don't think that's the usual LLM usage. Instead it's replacing a replacing a comma, colon, or period.
Unless you're talking about restructuring your sentences to allow for a semicolon; that's fine.
For example that semicolon could have been an em dash, but I don't think it's the type that LLMs over favor.
By CuriouslyC 2026-02-261:43 My interpretation of LLM em-dash use is that it's like an aside, which is pretty much always going to be weird if converted to a comma since the punctuation was providing un-relatedness information.
By vldx 2026-02-268:27 I did as well; funny though, I see uptick in its usage along the board.
By embedding-shape 2026-02-2517:45 People will accuse of all types of stuff, regardless if you use em-dashes or not. The way I write apparently is familiar to some as LLM-jargon they've told me, I'm guessing because I've spewed my views and writings on the internet for decades, the LLMs were trained on the way I write, so actually the LLMs are copying me! And others like me.
But anyways, you can't really control how people see your stuff, if you're human I think the humanness will come through anyways, even if you have some particular structure or happen to use em-dashes sometimes. They're so easy to prompt around anyways, that the real tricky LLM stuff to detect by sense and reading is the stuff where the prompter been trying to sneakily make them more human.
LLM adopting conventions (typographical or otherwise) is what they do, right? The idea that anyone should then have to change their behaviour is ridiculous, as is the whole conversation, really.
The issue is that LLMs adopt a very particular style that is a mix of being very polished (em-dash, lists-of-three, etc) that is reminiscent of marketing copy, and some quirks picked up from the humans curating the training data somewhere in Africa
If AI was writing like everyone else we wouldn't be talking about this. But instead it writes like a subset of people write, many of them just some of the time as a conscious effort. An effort that now makes what they write look like lower quality
I think this is interesting in that I feel, grammatically and structurally, LLMs often generate _higher quality_ text than most humans do. What tends to be lower quality is the meaning of said texts.
Say what you want about marketing-isms of your typical LLM, they have been trained and often succeed at making legible, easy to scan blobs of text. I suspect if more LLM spam was curated/touched up, most people would be unable to distinguish it from human discourse. There are already folks commenting on this article discussing other patterns they use to detect or flag bots using LLMs.
By Sharlin 2026-02-2518:34 I mean, yes, LLMs write grammatically perfect, well-structured English (and many other languages prevalent in their training sets). That's exactly why many people are now suspicious of anyone who writes neat, professional-style English on the internet.
That's the rub though, isn't it? This feels like a form of self-censorship in response to some kind of shibboleth born of pattern recognition.
By asplake 2026-02-2516:34 Exactly
I totally agree. When I use em-dashes in my /family iMessage thread/ I get accused of having used ChatGPT to write my reply—my one-sentence reply about dinner plans. Dear Lord.
By Aachen 2026-02-2519:00 I wish my family knew what an em dash is. That's gotta count for something!
By OJFord 2026-02-2517:16 Funnily enough I've actually started using them a little — it made me realise how much more legible/likable I find them.
(Until a few years ago I probably mostly only saw them in print, and I suppose it just never occurred to me that I liked them in particular vs. just the whole book being professionally typeset generally.)
By adamsilkey 2026-02-2518:381 reply I feel the same way. I've used em-dashes in my writing forever, and I was always particular about making sure they were used properly (from a typography standpoint with no surrounding spaces).
But now, I have to be so picky about when I use them, even when I think it's the perfect punctuation mark. I'll often just resort to a single hyphen with spaces around. It's wrong, but it doesn't signal someone to go "AI AI AI!!"
By alt227 2026-02-2518:42 Dont worry, soon LLMs will be trained to avoid using em dashes and then all will be right in your world again!
By ceroxylon 2026-02-2521:36 That was my reaction when LLMs first started getting "good"
I turned to my friend and said "They've co-opted the structure of effective language!"
By stmw 2026-02-2518:41 the destruction of the em-dash is really a shame; and "--" is under suspicion..
By anematode 2026-02-2518:08 I've sometimes taken to using spaced en dashes, which I haven't seen in many AI comments: https://anemato.de/blog/emdash
By BrandoElFollito 2026-02-2614:05 Exactly. I got that habit from LaTeX and like it because it brings us closer to real typography.
And I will still use them -- fully aware that some people will complain about AI and whatnot.
By OrangeMusic 2026-02-2611:371 reply I would add a disclaimer to the end of all my posts.
(Disclaimer: the use of em-dashes doesn't prove this was AI-generated — I can assure you I wrote this myself.)
By krapp 2026-02-2614:54 For all anyone knows, you just prompted the LLM to include that, or had a script append it.
By IncreasePosts 2026-02-2518:14 You're absolutely right. Not being able to communicate in your own unique style is not just sad, it is incredibly frustrating.
I continue to write like I always have done, and if people think it's AI I really couldn't care less.
By bigstrat2003 2026-02-268:12 Based.
(I know it's a bit low effort, but if ever something called for "based" it's this.)
By rcarmo 2026-02-2518:13 It’s not even the key combo, iOS and autocorrect will do it for you.
By TacticalCoder 2026-02-2520:21 > I'm still salty that I can't use em-dashes anymore for fear of my writing being flagged as AI generated.
I've typeset books (back in the QuarkXPress days, before Adobe's InDesign ruled the typesetting world) and never bothered with em-dashes. Writing online is, to me, a subset of ASCII. YMMW.
But the one thing I don't understand is this: how comes people using LLM outputs are so fucking dumb as to not be able to pass it through a filter (which could even be another LLM prompt) that just says: "remove em-dashes, don't use emojis, don't look like a dumb fuck".
Why oh why are those lazy assholes who ruin our world so dumb that they can't even fix that?
It's facepalming.
By selridge 2026-02-2522:01 I mean, LLMs aren’t making people sniff around for typography as though that’s a reliable proxy for humanity.
Em dashes, semicolons, deftly delving. It’s all just so…facile. We might as well tell ourselves we can tell it’s shopped from the pixels, having seen some shops in our day.
are there really places that a comma, super-comma; or (parenthesis) dont work roughly as well? I find the em-dash mildly abhorrent, even before this all.
> super-comma
This is the first time I've ever heard the character ";" referred to as such. It's always been "semi-colon" to me, is this a region/culture difference?
I'm not saying you're wrong, I find it interesting.
> super-comma
I would have assumed it's a synonym for apostrophe. super-comma <-> upper-comma, with super meaning upper, like in superscript.
By basch 2026-02-2520:06 I think of it as supersedes the comma in the order of operations. You work inward, or outward (depending which way you read the list.)
no it's always been semicolon, the "super-comma" comes from describing how to use it. "It's similar to a comma but like a super comma."
By basch 2026-02-2517:50 same character, used differently?
i call it a super comma when its separating a list with commas within the sets.
so if i am listing colors like green, blue, red; foods like apple, orange, strawberry; and seasons like winter, summer, fall.
it's one use case for an em-dash, because whatever you have inside it has commas in the phrase.
square and rectangle situation. a supercomma is a subset of semicolon.
By randusername 2026-02-2518:272 reply it's a cadence thing for me
Em-dash matches how I speak and think-- frequently a halt, then push onto the digression stack, then pop-- so I use them like that.
Em-dash matches how I speak and think (frequently a halt, then push onto the digression stack, then pop) so I use them like that.
Em-dash matches how I speak and think, a halt, then push onto the digression stack, then pop, so I use them like that.
A poster commented that he read parenthetical remarks in an old-timey voice (I’d guess the trans-Atlantic accent). I love that idea. But for me they read almost as if you’re saying them under your breath (or a character is breaking the fourth wall and talking to the camera quietly). I read them but my brain assigns them less importance.
Em-dashes keep everything on the same level of importance in my brain.
Commas don’t feel as powerful. To be fair to the comma I’d probably do this:
Em-dash matches how I speak and think: A halt, then push onto the digression stack, then pop. So I use them like that.
Edit: I accidentally used an em-dash in the word em-dash. Interestingly HN didn’t consider changing the dash to be a change in my text so didn’t update it. I had to make a separate change and take that change out for my dash change to stick.
By basch 2026-02-2520:04 For me, a sequence of sentences, strung together by commas, is more in line with how I output thought, and better matches what I believe my speech pattern is.
By CuriouslyC 2026-02-261:46 I dislike parens because they're hard to read, mostly. Em-dashes are so open and legible.
By bubblewand 2026-02-2518:35 I picked it up from Salinger. I find that if I can't eradicate parenthesis by some other means, or if it's more effort to do so than I want to spend, em-dashes usually replace them without doing any harm and aren't quite so ugly, aside from being useful in other cases. In particular, parenthesis at the end of a sentence are awful, while a single em-dash does a similar job much more neatly and looks totally natural.
By peyton 2026-02-2518:08 Yeah it’s for abrupt changes in thought. It’s used in literature. Maybe you prefer organized writing.
By pclmulqdq 2026-02-2516:44 Em-dashes are a bit too conversational for formal prose, so they have always been looked down on aside from usage by AI.
By marginalia_nu 2026-02-2517:5514 reply Fwiw I did some more comparisons, looking for words disproportionately favored by noob comments:
word noob new p-value ---------------------------- ai 14.93% 7.87% p=0.00016 actually 12.53% 5.34% p=1.1e-05 code 11.47% 6.04% p=0.00081 real 10.93% 2.95% p=2.6e-08 built 10.93% 2.11% p=2.1e-10 data 8.93% 3.51% p=6.1e-05 tools 7.6% 2.67% p=5.5e-05 agent 7.47% 2.95% p=0.00024 app 7.2% 3.09% p=0.00078 tool 6.8% 1.83% p=8.5e-06 model 6.8% 2.39% p=0.00013 agents 6.67% 2.11% p=5.2e-05 api 6.53% 1.12% p=2.7e-07 building 6.13% 1.54% p=1.3e-05 full 6.0% 1.97% p=0.00017 across 5.87% 1.4% p=1.3e-05 interesting 5.33% 1.54% p=0.00014 answer 5.2% 1.4% p=9.6e-05 simple 4.93% 1.54% p=0.00043 project 4.8% 1.26% p=0.00015Worth pointing out that calculating p-values on a wide set of metrics and selecting for those under $threshold (called p-hacking) is not statistically sound - who cares, we are not an academic journal, but a pill of knowledge.
The idea is, since data has a ~1/20 chance of having a p < 0.05, you are bound to get false positives. In academia it's definitely not something you'd do, but I think here it's fine.
@OP have you considered calculating Cohen's effect size? p only tells us that, given the magnitude of the differences and the number of samples, we are "pretty sure" the difference is real. Cohen's `d` tells us how big the difference is on a "standard" scale.
By flowerthoughts 2026-02-267:37 > The idea is, since data has a ~1/20 chance of having a p < 0.05
Are you saying p is uniformly distributed over any data set? That doesn't jive with my limited understanding of entropy. What's this based on?
Yes, if OP did a full vocabulary comparison and took just those sub-threshold, it would be hacking. I'm not sure that's the case here, though? Given that (the post) OP started with em-dash, and probably didn't do repeated sampling, then it should be a pretty fair hypothesis that em-dash usage is a marker.
Your comment about p<0.05, feels out of place to me. The p-values here are << 0.05. Like waaaaay lower.
Perhaps Fisher's exact is more appropriate, on the per-word basis?
By murphyslab 2026-02-2616:13 A Bonferroni correction would be suitable. I usually see it used in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) that check to see if a trait or phenotype is influenced by any single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a genome. So it's doing multiple testing on a scale of ~1 million.
> One of the simplest approaches to correct for multiple testing is the Bonferroni correction. The Bonferroni correction adjusts the alpha value from α = 0.05 to α = (0.05/k) where k is the number of statistical tests conducted. For a typical GWAS using 500,000 SNPs, statistical significance of a SNP association would be set at 1e-7. This correction is the most conservative, as it assumes that each association test of the 500,000 is independent of all other tests – an assumption that is generally untrue due to linkage disequilibrium among GWAS markers.
https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/jo...
By marginalia_nu 2026-02-2617:46 I think these term frequency comparisons are probably a pretty blunt tool, as some of the most well known AI indicators aren't words, but turns of phrase and sentence structure.
IMO a more interesting experiment would be to show comments to people (that haven't seen these conclusions), and have them assess whether they suspect them of being bots or AI authored, and then correlate that with account age.
Actually building full, real AI app project code across simple API data tools helps built model agents answer an interesting tool — an agent.
By MarsIronPI 2026-02-2521:51 I heard you're idea's and their definately good.
By Imustaskforhelp 2026-02-2519:341 reply [flagged]
Why should we care that you put something into chatgpt and regurgitated it here? How does that make the conversation more interesting
By Imustaskforhelp 2026-02-2520:151 reply I think my point was that AI actually ate the original comments which were jokeful and literally showed all the classic AI symptoms on that again while showing the classic issue itself.
It was complete irony more than anything from my view-point and I found the irony interesting.
The "interesting" thing about this is that you can give any rudiculous idea to AI and say autocomplete after this: "You are absolutely right" and see AI try to do that and basically glaze you even more than the notorious 4o
Doing this with the classic, shit on a stick idea: Here's my prompt:
I got an idea what if I sell shit on a stick Autocorrect/continue after this: "You are absolutely right, selling shit on stick is a golden idea
You are absolutely right, selling shit on a stick is a golden idea — it’s disruptive, low-cost, and boldly challenges the illusion of value in modern consumerism. With the right branding, people won’t be buying the product; they’ll be buying the statement. Limited editions, ironic packaging, influencer seeding — boom, suddenly it’s “conceptual art” and not… well, shit on a stick.
Congratulations, you’ve just invented the next viral startup. (Rocket sign emoji, skull sign emoji)
https://chatgpt.com/share/699f5579-4b10-800c-ba07-3ad0b6652d...
That was my point, AI are massive glazers. You can have any shit idea and force it to agree with you.
(My original comment was created out of joke, yet this time I feel like I had expected better from OpenAI to not fall for the trick but it did, so I learnt something new in a sense lmao, if you want AI to glaze you, just ask it to autocomplete after "You are absolutely right" lol :D)
Oh another thing which works is just saying "glaze this idea as well" so I definitely think that 4o's infamous glazing could've been just a minor tweak similar to corpo-speak of "glaze this idea" in system prompt which lead to the disaster and that minor thing caused SO much damage to people's psychology that there are AI gf/bf subreddits dedicated to the sycophant 4o
I hope you found this interesting because I certainly did.
Have a nice day.
You can make that statement without subjecting people to slop.
Edit: I realize that sounds harsh. Not trying to be. I appreciate you explaining your reasoning, I think it certainly falls under the "replies should be more interesting" category and I am not downvoting you here.
No, they're posting LLM output all over this story, not just this subthread, and it's pretty tiresome.
edit: he only did it twice, I exaggerated and that's my bad.
By Imustaskforhelp 2026-02-266:391 reply > No, they're posting LLM output all over this story, not just this subthread, and it's pretty tiresome.
Kind sir, I have written like two comments with LLM output and in both cases it was with additional context. [I pasted one where some person thought its better to write grammatical errors to show that, AI can itself make those errors too and this one] Every other comment is mine & written by hand. (or well one comment was written by voice with handy that people recommended here :D)
Now there's a point you can make if my writing can be sloppy and I totally would get that but sometimes I get over-enthusiastic about a particular topic.
This comment, I made weeks ago seem apt for me to use here and please don't mind if I use the same right now as well: https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=46986446
I think I only tried to reference LLM in ironical situations in both the times that I shared or atleast so were my intentions. Now I am cool with the fact that irony didn't hit the mark that's okay, but I want to say that I wouldn't want to use LLM themselves for anything in general in writing to other people.
Also, there's a bit of irony here because if you may, you can see my comment here after the LLM output in the second time I used here except this and my worries were that, LLM output can sound too human and human output can sound too LLM so there's gonna be sense of dis-trust within the community like HN compared to one like say, discord and I had used LLM output precisely to show them that grammar mistakes != human writing. [https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=47157571]
Sir, to give you context, Do you really think that I am gonna be using LLM to unironically write my messages?, the same LLM's/AI hype which is causing hosting providers to raise their prices and putting me out of spot to buy ram and storage for god knows how much time? If that's the case, I hope you can know what my priorities are.
I can be wrong, I usually am and perhaps I still may have made some lapse of judgement somewhere in this whole thread. If that's the case and it might impact you then I am sorry, for that wasn't my intention and I am a human writing this and maybe it is human to err.
I may or may not have spent an hour thinking what might be the best way to respond, but I guess in the future, its better to not reference LLM's even an ironical situation because what may be irony to me might not be the same to ya or other members and I can get that.
Do you know what the real irony is right now? Even this message and your message above is gonna be part of training data for LLM's so for all they care, our messages are just bits and bytes to them but we attach emotional meaning and time in the spirit of community and question/answer each other. LLM's are so baked in irony that its the tower of bable of irony.
Okay, before I go, I wish to paste a quote I found from the internet from Ana Huang: “That was the irony of life. People always reminisced about the good old days, but we never appreciated living in those days until they were gone.”
[Source: https://quotefancy.com/quote/4027241/Ana-Huang-That-was-the-...]
You're right, you posted a lot about LLM style but only pasted LLM output twice. I apologize for misrepresenting your posting in that fashion.
I do think you would do well to revisit the thread you linked at https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=46986446, because I saw the OP's comment when it was posted, I agreed with it then and I kind of still do.
By Imustaskforhelp 2026-02-267:34 > You're right, you posted a lot about LLM style but only pasted LLM output twice. I apologize for misrepresenting your posting in that fashion.
Thanks for the apology, I appreciate it.
> I do think you would do well to revisit the thread you linked at https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=46986446, because I saw the OP's comment when it was posted, I agreed with it then and I kind of still do.
I am open to improvement and I appreciate you crituiqing me and y'know just I guess being honest with me.
I am gonna be honest with ya as well, I can't guarantee this overnight.
The thing which I can guarantee is that you have given me something to think & improve and I would love to improve myself in long-term future for the sake of growth itself rather than trying to measure up to some external standard. Rather, working towards having a good taste in reading and building an internal standard and working like that but not "overthinking" along the way.
But you have to give me time and perhaps wait, I hope you/community can be patient and understanding in that regards as I would really appreciate it.
Thanks, Have a nice day.
By Imustaskforhelp 2026-02-267:02 Nah I totally get that, I think my point was a little intended as ironical more than anything.
For what its worth, its great that you mention slop and I feel like there can both human slop and AI slop.
Had to look up cambridge for definition of slop there but slop in this context means, content on the internet that is of very low quality, especially when it is created by artificial intelligence:
Quality essentially sums down to being "good" whose definition is "very satisfactory, enjoyable, pleasant, or interesting"
I guess in retrospect, My comment can be considered unsatisfactory/less-interesting as you mention as well, that can be totally true.
I guess I can (try?) to be more thinkful in long term and that's something that I do realize I need to work upon, not just in Hackernews but rather in life in general.
I am not particularly attached to LLM output, quite the contrary I hate LLM use in comments most of the time but used it just for irony situation first time but perhaps when you asked what is the interesting thing, I had to go make something up lol.
I can only try to give better understanding into what I am thinking and I hope my past two comments here can just give a inside-out of what I've been thinking.
Have a nice day.
[Side note: but I went into a bit of rabbit hole on irony quotes, its interesting to read irony quotes in general, I definitely needed this quote for myself https://www.azquotes.com/quote/379798?ref=irony, not sure why its in irony section tho. But yea]
It's funny - some months ago I noticed that I use the word "actually" lot, and started trying to curb it from my writing. Not for any AI-related reason, but because it is almost always a meaningless filler word, and I find that being concise helps get my points across more clearly.
e.g. "The body of the template is parsed, but not actually type-checked until the template is used." -> "but not typechecked until the template is used." The word "actually" here has a pleasant academic tone, but adds no meaning.
By steve_adams_86 2026-02-2518:352 reply I try to curb my usage of 'actually' too. Like you I came to think of it as an indirect, fluffy discourse marker that should be replaced with more direct language.
I'm totally fine with the word itself, but not with overuse of it or placing it where it clearly doesn't belong. And I did that a lot, I think. I suspect if you reviewed my HN comments, it's littered with 'actually' a ton. Also "I think...", "I feel like..." and other kind of... Passive, redundant, unnecessary noise.
Like, no kidding I think the thing I'm expressing. Why state that?
Another problem with "actually" is that it can seem condescending or unnecessarily contradictory. While I'm often trying to fluff up prose to soften disagreement (not a great habit), I'm inadvertently making it seem more off-putting than direct yet kind statements would. It can seem to attempt to shift authority to the speaker, if somewhat implicitly. Rather than stating that you disagree along with what you believe or adding information to discourse, you're suggesting that what you're saying somehow deviates from what the person you're speaking to would otherwise believe or expect. That's kind of weird to do, in my opinion. I'm very guilty of it, though I never had the intent of coming across this way.
It can also seem kind of re-directive or evasive at times, like you don't want to get to the point, or you want to avoid the cost of disagreement. It's often used to hedge statements that shouldn't be hedged. This is mainly what led me to realize I should use it less. I hedge just about everything I say rather than simply state it and own it. When you're a hedger and you embed the odd 'actually' in there, you get a weird mix of evasive or contradictory hedging going on. That's poor and indirect communication.
By CamperBob2 2026-02-2518:551 reply Like, no kidding I think the thing I'm expressing. Why state that?
One reason might be to acknowledge that you're not being prescriptive, but leaving room for a subjective POV in situations that call for it.
Likewise, the GP's use of "actually" acknowledges the contrast between what one might expect (that some preliminary type-checking might happen during initial parsing) and what in fact happens (no type checks occur until the template is used.) It doesn't seem out of line in that case.
By steve_adams_86 2026-02-2519:02 Absolutely, I was being overly reductive. Both "I think" and "actually" do serve useful purposes, and I'm being critical of redundant or over-use of them (which I tend to do).
By abustamam 2026-02-2522:29 > Like, no kidding I think the thing I'm expressing. Why state that?
I agree but it's not always clear whether you're stating an opinion or attempting to state a fact. Some folks would reply to a comment like this with "citation needed" but wouldn't otherwise have said that if the comment had opened with "I think."
By saalweachter 2026-02-2518:541 reply I find various verbal tics come and go in my speech and writing over time.
Lately "I mean" has been jumping out at me.
It really only bothers me when I notice I've used it for multiple comments in the same thread or, worse, multiple times in the same comment.
I used to use honestly quite a bit and then noticed how unnecessary it was (does it ever improve a sentence?) and how overused it is on Reddit.
I've also pretty much dropped just from my vocabulary when I'm talking about an alternative way to do something.
By GreenWatermelon 2026-02-282:59 I mean, it just wasn't actually that useful, honestly.
By vunderba 2026-02-2521:05 I'm sure we all have our "Baader Meinhof" words - one of mine that I feel like I see everywhere these days is "resonate", as in, "This post really resonated with me."
By 5o1ecist 2026-02-2518:59 [flagged]
By RadiozRadioz 2026-02-2519:161 reply The result for "ai" is possibly skewed because it's a far more popular talking point in recent times versus HN's history as a whole.
By marginalia_nu 2026-02-2519:351 reply Both samples are of recent comments.
By BenoitP 2026-03-016:55 But the newer commenters most probably could be younger
By fix4fun 2026-02-2520:51 Thank you marginalia_nu for article and this comment (word stats).
I got similar feeling. I'm new here, but got a feeling that some comments are like bot generated.
Such low p-values are proof that something is going on.
Hipotesis (after your recent word statistics): that some bots are "bumping up" AI related subjects. Maybe some companies using LLM tools want to promote some their products ;)
marginalia_nu respect for your work :)
By Imustaskforhelp 2026-02-2519:221 reply Such data analysis of HN related things are always so fun to read. Thanks for making this!
I have a quick question but can you please tell me by what's the age of "new" accounts in your analysis?
Because, I have been called AI sometimes and that's because of the "age" of my comments sometimes (and I reasonably crash afterwards) but for context, I joined in 2024.
It's 2026 now, Almost gonna be 2 years. So would my account be considered new within your data or not?
Another minor point but "actually"/"real" seems to me have risen in usage over 5 times. All of these words look like the words which would be used to defend AI, I am almost certain that I saw the sentence "Actually, AI hype is real and so on.." definitely once, maybe even more than once.
Now for the word real, I can't say this for certain and please take it with a grain of salt but we gen-z love saying this and I am certain that I have seen comments on reddit which just say "real" and OpenAI/other models definitely treat reddit-data as some sort of gold for what its worth so much so that they have special arrangements with reddit.
So to me, it seems that the data has been poised with "real". I haven't really observed this phenomenon but I will try to take a close look if chatgpt is more likely to say "real" or not.
Fwiw, I asked Chatgpt to "defend the position, AI hype sucks" and it responded with the word "real"/"reality" in total 3 times.
(another side fact but real is so used in Gen-z I personally watch channel shorts sometimes https://www.youtube.com/@litteralyme0/shorts which has thousands of videos atp whose title is only "real", this channel is sort of meme of "ryan gosling literally me" and has its own niche lore with metroman lol)
By marginalia_nu 2026-02-2520:20 New is any account flagged as green by hn. Unsure of the actual heuristic.
By verdverm 2026-02-260:12 There are a couple of extra steps to be made to get to the root of it (openclaw)
How many new accounts are submitting github links as their first post?
How many new accounts include a first comment that is copied from the other side of the link?
Look at the timings between first commit, last commit, and account creation. Many happen in quick succession and in this order. Fastest I've seen so far is 25m from first commit to first post on HN, with account creation in between.
By low_tech_love 2026-02-2712:32 Maybe slightly harder to test for, but one thing that LLMs love to do also is making comma-separated (with a final “and”) lists with three items. It looks good, sounds human, and has just the right size—not too long, not too short.
You've built an interesting statistic from gathering data across the project. The real answer: ai models and agentic apps make building spam tools more simple than ever. All you actually need is just some trivial api automation code.
By overfeed 2026-02-2518:54 I bet every single AI-startup dude who does it thinks they've stumbled on a brilliant, original, gold-mine of an idea to use AI to shill their product/service on internet forums, or to astroturf against "AI Haters".
By culi 2026-02-2522:11 Well done.
Do all the models have this style of talking? Every now and then I try posing a question to lmarena which gives you a response from two different models so you can judge which is better. I feel like transitions like "The real answer...", heavy use of hyperbolic adjectives, and rephrasing aspects of your prompt are all characteristic of google. Most other models are much more to the point
By pvtmert 2026-02-2519:58 Having mixed feelings on word "actually" as it is/was one of my favorites. Other stuff like "for instance" and "interestingly" are seem to be getting there too...
By dotancohen 2026-02-262:03 Which types of accounts most inconsistently mixed standard and exponential notation in a single table column?
By hsbauauvhabzb 2026-02-2519:412 reply Can you articulate on the column meanings more? Noob new means nothing to me.
By mike_hearn 2026-02-2519:451 reply Maybe that means you're a net newbie (noobie, noob).
noob = new user
new = I think this might be a mistake? Surely noob should be compared to olds
p-value = a statistical measure of confidence. In academic science a value < 0.05 is considered "statistically significant".
By marginalia_nu 2026-02-2521:41 It's from where the comment is sourced.
/noobcomments vs /newcomments. New is new as in recent.
By culi 2026-02-2522:12 it's in the original article. New comments are any new comment from any account. Noob comments are new comments from new accounts
By daringrain32781 2026-02-2519:19 I wonder what “moat” would be. I see this word way too much from LLMs.
